1st Use of Colorado ERPO/ Red Flag Law

Status
Not open for further replies.

Craig_AR

Contributing Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2007
Messages
1,189
Location
Arkansas
Just spotted this Denver Post news article:
Colorado’s red-flag law invoked, likely for the first time, in Denver case
"One day after Colorado’s red-flag law came into effect, a Denver judge temporarily granted a police officer’s request to keep a suicidal man’s confiscated guns under the new firearm seizure law.
Denver police filed the petition for the temporary extreme risk protection order Jan. 2 in Denver Probate Court for a man suspected of beating his wife and who made suicidal statements when contacted by officers, according to a copy of the petition obtained by The Denver Post."


Posting this not to set off a big discussion on Red Flags, rather to allow folks to follow a specific case to see how it progresses.
 
So in the absence of the new ERPO law, what would've stopped LE from seizing this guy's guns? Even the article points out the redundancy.
 
I don’t have statistics, but I’d wager most suicides are committed by means other than firearms. Are they going to confiscate the poor man’s rope, car, etc?
 
It would appear there was no reason to use the red flag law if he was indeed beating his wife.
 
I have pointed out since the 1960s that anything you can do wrong involving a gun is already against the law.

The gun specific laws are redundant -- if the goal to to reduce crime.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top