.22 LR Navy?

Status
Not open for further replies.

ZVP

Member
Joined
May 20, 2010
Messages
937
Has anyone ever produced a .22 rimfire chambered full sized navy model?
It would sell millions! The frame and action are more than strong enough and setting it up for rimfire ammo should be simple enlugh
Seems like a natural revolver.
I know there was a 22. Short sing)e shoot back in the 60s.
 
I'm pretty sure you are exaggerating by at least a couple of decimal points. As intriguing as I and other black powder shooters would find it I just don't see the Great Unwashed Masses flocking to the gun stores to buy such a thing.

Most folks won't trust a wedge locked style gun in the first place and a lot of others will look at the rear sight notch in the hammer and get an odd "WT....?" look in their face. At that point they'll set it back on the counter and wipe their hands on their shirts sort of like they just picked up something that might give them cooties or intestinal distress.

And while the Ruger Single Six has a pretty good market share and reputation I don't see massive numbers of owners posting up for the newly introduced Uberti and Pietta single action 1873's chambered in .22LR and with some models delivered with both .22LR and .22WMR cylinders. I suspect that this would be taken into account if we are expecting the Italian makers to produce such a gun.

It IS an interesting idea but it would at best fill a niche market. And good profit margins are not based off niche markets I'm afraid.

The idea is an intriguing one though. As a metal shop tinkering sort of fella that has a couple of .36 cap&ball guns I've been meaning to sell it makes me wonder if I could sleeve the bore with some rifled liner and bore through and sleeve the chambers and if the blade on the hammer would strike the rims..... oh wait, there's no recoil shield to hold the rounds in place. So I'd be looking at some major modification to the cylinder as well to allow me to install a donut rear section on a cut down cylinder. with a loading gate and firing pin.

Great.... just what I need. My To Do list is already so long that it rolls clean across the shop floor. Now I have to pen in yet another idea on the end of the already long roll of paper..... THANKS ! ! ! !
 
Just because one person really wants something doesn't mean millions would sell. I mean just look at how the black powder guys get all worked up about a .44 Navy. A 22 rimfire might give them a stroke!

They do sell 22 conversions for some of the black powder replicas. I have no idea as to accuracy.
 
One thing against a .22 revolver based on a full size gun made for a larger caliber, like a .45 SAA, is that they are heavy as all getout. I have handled (but not fired) one of the very rare Colt SA's made in .22, and also fired a conversion from (IIRC) .44-40 to .22 LR. There is a good reason why Ruger scaled down the Single Six.

Jim
 
I have the pietta 1873 22/22mag, I have 1851s and 1858s in .44, have conversion cylinders for the 1858s that I got 5 years ago at around $150.

I have thought about a .22 conversion cylinder for the 1851, dont figure I will spend more than the gun cost on a conversion cylinder for it though.

If they built an 1851 in .22 I would consider buying one, but maybe I am one of those niche guys.

d
 
I'm pretty sure you are exaggerating by at least a couple of decimal points. As intriguing as I and other black powder shooters would find it I just don't see the Great Unwashed Masses flocking to the gun stores to buy such a thing.

Most folks won't trust a wedge locked style gun in the first place and a lot of others will look at the rear sight notch in the hammer and get an odd "WT....?" look in their face. At that point they'll set it back on the counter and wipe their hands on their shirts sort of like they just picked up something that might give them cooties or intestinal distress.

And while the Ruger Single Six has a pretty good market share and reputation I don't see massive numbers of owners posting up for the newly introduced Uberti and Pietta single action 1873's chambered in .22LR and with some models delivered with both .22LR and .22WMR cylinders. I suspect that this would be taken into account if we are expecting the Italian makers to produce such a gun.

It IS an interesting idea but it would at best fill a niche market. And good profit margins are not based off niche markets I'm afraid.

The idea is an intriguing one though. As a metal shop tinkering sort of fella that has a couple of .36 cap&ball guns I've been meaning to sell it makes me wonder if I could sleeve the bore with some rifled liner and bore through and sleeve the chambers and if the blade on the hammer would strike the rims..... oh wait, there's no recoil shield to hold the rounds in place. So I'd be looking at some major modification to the cylinder as well to allow me to install a donut rear section on a cut down cylinder. with a loading gate and firing pin.

Great.... just what I need. My To Do list is already so long that it rolls clean across the shop floor. Now I have to pen in yet another idea on the end of the already long roll of paper..... THANKS ! ! ! !
If you decide to sell let me know. As I shoot BP almost exclusively.
 
Well it was just an idea to have a really cool new revolversion but I see the troubles producing such a revolver

This is why you discuss gun ideas on these forums. To hash over the possibilitys...
Nothing beats a Ruger Single Six!
 
I am a very large person with very large hands. Something like that would make sense for someone like me. For instance, my Blackhawks fit my hands much better than my Single Sixes. My Taurus Tracker 22 is my favorite DA 22 because it is bigger and heavier than my other ones. I would probably get a GP100 in 22 if they were cheaper. So yeah, I wouldn't mind having a Colt Navy in 22lr as a fun plinker.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top