.357 Magnum 158gr Federal Hydra-Shok (from a Derringer)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Brass Fetcher

Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2006
Messages
1,686
Location
Bill Clintons old stomping grounds.
Many thanks to J.K. for funding this test in full.

Cartridge : Federal 158gr Hydra-Shok

Firearm : Bond Arms .357 Magnum Derringer with 3.0" barrel length

Block calibration : 8.4cm @ 590 ft/sec (Within ideal block tolerances)

All shots fired from 10' distance from muzzle to the front face of the gelatin block.

Shot 1 - Bare gelatin shot. Impacted at 1017 ft/sec, penetrated 16.0" of gelatin and was recovered in a polyester bullet arresting box. Bullet recovered at 0.372" average diameter and 115.3gr weight.

Shot 2 - Overpenetration test. Bullet impacted at 1002 ft/sec, penetrated 8.0" of ballistic gelatin, both sides of an interior wall, 5.0" of ballistic gelatin and was recovered in a polyester bullet arresting box. Bullet recovered at 0.394" average diameter and 114.9gr weight.
attachment.php

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • 357mag158grFederalHSbareblock.JPG
    357mag158grFederalHSbareblock.JPG
    33.1 KB · Views: 225
  • 357mag158grFedHSDerringerBullets.JPG
    357mag158grFedHSDerringerBullets.JPG
    25.7 KB · Views: 223
Hmph. So, jacket separates, then the core doesn't expand. Seriously overpenetrative too.

Looks like a loser for street carry, at least in a 3" or smaller barrel.
 
You can't expect much performance from ammo out of a derringer. Too much velocity is lost and that prevents proper expansion. That 3" barrel probably includes the chamber so what you really have is a 1.7" actual rifled portion of the barrel. While you might as well use a solid lead SWC its not like the round is impotent of ineffective. Solid non-expanding bullets have been ending fights and killing people for years.
 
Actually, this gun may put more heat on the round than a 2" barrel revolver - there's no cylinder gap loss!

I think this is just another Federal wimp-out load. Not ALL Federals wimp out, but enough do that I would never carry 'em.

In this case it's all bad news: if the round isn't going fast enough to expand, there is NO WAY it should shed it's jacket. That's flat-out unacceptable, as Plainsman already pointed out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top