RealGun
Member
Rimrock has 265 GC also.Both Montana and Cast Performance has 265grn FN/GC bullets, that's plenty heavy for the .41. I've only gone as big as 250grn, meself.
Rimrock has 265 GC also.Both Montana and Cast Performance has 265grn FN/GC bullets, that's plenty heavy for the .41. I've only gone as big as 250grn, meself.
41 and 44
I have 6 1/2" NM Blackhawk Flat Tops in 44 and 41. I revisited my seldom used H110 loads in both during the same trip to the range. The 44 was scary for me and I didn't control the gun very well, while the 41, for me anyway, seemed quite at home with its comparable load. I loaded 50 more of the 41s and will save the 44s for the Smith 629 with better grips.
There really isn't much wiggle room with H110. I am loading by the book. My Smith is a 5" 629 Classic with ILS removed (The Plug).I trust that those loads are compatible with a S&W......
Ive always wanted one, just waiting for one to find me. Its a missing gap in my magnum revolver collection. What are the heaviest common hardcasts made for this round that i dont need to cast myself?
The 58 shoots POA and basically likes the same generic .41 load the 57 does... that is 9.0grn Unique under any 215grn cast SWC.
Here they are in a group pic... my 1980'ish 4" model 57 next to my 1970'ish model 58... another Unobtanium List gun checked off!!!
Shooting the gun went fine. My IMR 4227 load is still a little dirty, so extraction is gummed up a bit still. I am confident in the gun now so will push the load closer to max where the powder is most efficient.I'm aware of that. Back in my younger days, my brother and I just about ruined his 6" model 57 hotrodding it, these days my Smiths get the 'softball' load... I save the big boomers for the Dan Wesson, however, I don't go over published data, I don't see any reason to.
Let us know how that turns out... I have the same problem with both my .45 Colt Vaquero and .44SPC Blackhawk. I've had the cylinders reamed, but I'm debating having the forcing cone on the .44 looked at.