45 Colt data for 5.5 " SAA

Status
Not open for further replies.

Al13

Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2014
Messages
16
I am beginning to load 45 Colt for a Ruger New Vaquero. All the data I see shows velocities obtained from a 7.5" barrel SAA. I would like to get about 850 fps from a 250 grain Hornaday XTP from my 5.5" barrel but max loads show 900 ish from 7.5" barrels. Any ideas on where to get data for 5.5" barrels ? Loads so far (9.1 gr of AA5 behind 200 gr bullets ) produced 700fps.The same load fired through a 7.5" barrel achieved about 900 fps.
 
Last edited:
There is no separate data for different barrel lengths. They tell you the barrel length so you can judge the velocity you will achieve. Data is worked up using pressure limits, not barrel lengths or velocities. If you want a different velocity change powders.

Why do you want a specific velocity? Why 850fps with a 250gr XTP? IMO accuracy is more important than velocity. More information will help us help you.

Welcome back to THR...
 
I went to ballistics by the inch and they tested 3 different bullets from the same make 45colt revolvers , one with a 7.5 barrel and the other with a 5.5 barrel .
The difference were :
133
117
81

You are going to have to get chronograph and work up to know what your gun and load will do by the numbers . If they are only getting 900 max out of a 7.5 barrel , I doubt you will get 850 out of a 5.5 barrel using the same bullet unless you use a different powder like ArchAngel said .
 
Thank you for the fast reply. I guess what I am asking is what type of velocity loss is normal from a 7.5" barrel to a 5.5". If 850 fps is the max for any given powder and a particular bullet combo from a 7.5" barrel, is there a "standard" loss of velocity I should see from my 5.5" barrel that would indicate whether I am loading to similar pressure.
 
I went to ballistics by the inch and they tested 3 different bullets from the same make 45colt revolvers , one with a 7.5 barrel and the other with a 5.5 barrel .
The difference were :
133
117
81

You are going to have to get chronograph and work up to know what your gun and load will do by the numbers . If they are only getting 900 max out of a 7.5 barrel , I doubt you will get 850 out of a 5.5 barrel using the same bullet unless you use a different powder like ArchAngel said .

Ok. Thank you.
 
Keep in mind many of the "barrels" used in developing data are just that test barrels. That doesn't account for the loss of velocity via the cylinder gap.
Have not used AA powders other than 5744, but can tell you that unique, bludot, and 2400 all will get you to your stated velocity requirements in the 5 1/2 inch barrel vaquero, as will 3f blackpowder.
 
Keep in mind many of the "barrels" used in developing data are just that test barrels. That doesn't account for the loss of velocity via the cylinder gap.
Yep, and some barrels are simply slower than others, even in autos with no cylinder gap.

I have a 6" 14-3 that runs like my 4" 10-6, and a 6" 14-5 that is slower than both.
 
So when people refer to the original BP loads under a 255 gr bullet achieving 900 fps, we should assume it was out of a 7.5" barrel.
 
So when people refer to the original BP loads under a 255 gr bullet achieving 900 fps, we should assume it was out of a 7.5" barrel.
You really can't compare the two because the original 45 Colt ammo used a healed bullet which left more room in the case for powder. It was also a lead bullet, not a jacketed bullet. You can push a 250gr Cast Bullet to 900 fps with smokeless powder today because they produce less resistance in the barrel requiring less powder to push the bullet.

If you picked a 250gr bullet at 900 fps to be historically correct you should be using a lead bullet. There are at least a dozen powders that will do that at standard pressures including my favorite, HS-6 and my old favorite W231/HP-38. Universal and Unique will do it too.

EDIT: It seems I'm incorrect about the bullet type in the old 45 Colt round. Sorry for the incorrect information!
 
Last edited:
You really can't compare the two because the original 45 Colt ammo used a healed bullet which left more room in the case for powder. It was also a lead bullet, not a jacketed bullet. You can push a 250gr Cast Bullet to 900 fps with smokeless powder today because they produce less resistance in the barrel requiring less powder to push the bullet.

If you picked a 250gr bullet at 900 fps to be historically correct you should be using a lead bullet. There are at least a dozen powders that will do that at standard pressures including my favorite, HS-6 and my old favorite W231/HP-38. Universal and Unique will do it too.

AA, are you referring to the 45 Colt's predecessor, the 44 Colt? Not being pedantic, or not wanting to, but the 45 Colt was never loaded with a heeled outside lubricated bullet like it's immediate predecessor, the 44 Colt. In fact, a key factor in the success of the 45 Colt was that it used a full bearing length .452" inside lubricated bullet.

If my understanding is incorrect, I'd welcome the reference material.
 
AA, are you referring to the 45 Colt's predecessor, the 44 Colt? Not being pedantic, or not wanting to, but the 45 Colt was never loaded with a heeled outside lubricated bullet like it's immediate predecessor, the 44 Colt. In fact, a key factor in the success of the 45 Colt was that it used a full bearing length .452" inside lubricated bullet.

If my understanding is incorrect, I'd welcome the reference material.
I stand corrected. I knew the bullet allowed 40gr of BP but I got the reason wrong.
I never claimed to be perfect and I keep proving I'm far from it! :scrutiny:
 
I am beginning to load 45 Colt for a Ruger New Vaquero. All the data I see shows velocities obtained from a 7.5" barrel SAA. I would like to get about 850 fps from a 250 grain Hornaday XTP from my 5.5" barrel but max loads show 900 ish from 7.5" barrels. Any ideas on where to get data for 5.5" barrels ? Loads so far (9.1 gr of AA5 behind 200 gr bullets ) produced 700fps.The same load fired through a 7.5" barrel achieved about 900 fps.
Your going to be hard pressed to find data for that kind of velocity from a New Vaq, as they are considered the weaker frames and as you stated similar pistols with a few extra inches of barrel max out around where you want to be. In other platforms hitting those speeds and then some is no problem, I push some pretty insane speed loads from my Model 25, BH and lever guns but the Colts, clones, New Vaq etc just cannot handle the pressure. What you may try to get close though is Lil Gun behind a standard primer and work up a ladder. This powder produces excellent velocities in my hot .45 Colt loads. Also may I ask why you want that specific velocity of 850-900? My favorite load to date for the weak frame .45 Colt with the 250-255 grain bullets uses Blue Dot. It only pushes around 740-760 from a 5-6" revolver but is an absolute tack driver of a load and is very easy on the guns and economical to load. If accuracy shooting is your endgame I would suggest trying some of that, if hunting power is what your after I would try the Lil Gun. Good luck!
 
Nope. Loading a 255 gr bullet with 37 gr of Goes 3f yields 900 fps out of my new vaquero.

Can this kind of performance be safely duplicated with smokeless powder in a similar revolver ?

The data in my manuals (Hornaday and Lyman) don't seem to support this in Non Ruger loads.
 
AL13 yes it can. Get your 5 1/2 in barreled gun and a chronograph out and get to work. If you're simply quoting reloading manual data, is that data actual 45 colt loads, or are they loads for the weekend dressup folks. There is a difference in what a real 45 colt will do, and what the folks that dress up in costumes and shoot squib loads on a weekend use.
I haven't looked for quite some time, but Alliant's web data for the 45 colt shows some velocity that indicates why the 45 lasted for so long, and makes it seem rather stupid to try and use "Ruger" data. That data actually is close to what you find in the older reloading manuals, and my Chronograph indicates their numbers are good then and now.
 
I stand corrected. I knew the bullet allowed 40gr of BP but I got the reason wrong.
I never claimed to be perfect and I keep proving I'm far from it! :scrutiny:

No worries. Wasn't after a gotcha :) With modern brass, it's hard to imagine how 40 grs ever fit in a case. Even with the balloon head case, must have needed a lot of compression.
 
I can drop tube 40 gr. of 3f into a 45 colt case, but as I prefer to use a wad, 37 gr. didn't require as much compression. If a person were to shoot a cup based bullet like the Remington bulk bullet drop tubing 40 gr. of 3f and seating the bullet would not be a horrendous chore.
 
Ken Waters reported 250 Hornadys at 828-893 fps from a 4 5/8" Ruger with Level II loads he considered suitable for modern SAAs and M25s. So 850 fps 5.5" can surely be done. You can do it with less powder and money with cast bullets and a coated cast bullet will leave your gun relatively clean.

But as said, guns and components are variable enough that you are not going to be able to fine tune a load by reading or calculating.
Consumer chronographs are relatively cheap. Get one and KNOW what your ammo is doing. I use the Prochrono Digital which can be had on sale for less than $100.
https://www.midwayusa.com/product/852429/competition-electronics-prochrono-digital-chronograph
 
Thanks for the replies.

Not loading cowboy loads, (at least not per the Hornaday book). My chrono is showing 200 fps below the same loads shot from a 7.5" barrel.

I will look into the loads mentioned above. Thanks for the information !

Great forum.
 
Keep in mind Walkalongs post about some guns being slow and some being fast.
Looking forward to seeing how you come out with your project.
This is true for sure; depending on the condition of the chamber and barrel you can see significant velocity differences between different examples of the same model revolver. For instance I have two M25s; one is +P rated one is not as they are different gen revolvers but both the same gun. However the +P rated example is always a solid 35-50fps faster with a given load than its sibling. This is the pistol I load hot for as well as a BH and a couple lever action carbines. I use nickel brass for these loads so as to never use them in my other .45 Colts as it would no doubt grenade them. (You do not in fact need the extra case volume of the .454 Casull to get .454 Casull like velocities, it's totally possible with standard .45 Colt brass but the pressures are so high that they do not want them accidentally getting into a weaker .45 so they use the slightly longer case.)
If I were to pull back on the Lil Gun by a few grains, it still makes a nice load for a weak frame revolver, just with much less juice behind it. Accuracy is good either way in my guns using 225-250-255 pills. Other weights higher or lower have been "hit or miss" for me, no pun intended lol.
 
The velocity difference between my first generation 7 .5 in. New model Blackhawk, from 1974, and my new vaquero with it's 5 .5 inch barrel is so negligible that the old blackhawk has been for the most part retired. The nice thing is they both shoot the same unique and 250-260 gr bullets with equal accuracy.
I still have brass from the late 60's early 70's and then like now the Remington has a bit more case capacity and a touch longer than the Winchester.
 
"...All the data I see..." Forget about the velocity data you see in manuals. They only apply to the exact firearm, components and conditions on the day of the tests. Load for accuracy out of your revolver, not to match the manual.
This will give you an idea of how close velocities between barrel lengths really are. Between a 5.5" and 7.5" it's about 81 FPS. Not enough to matter for anything.
http://www.ballisticsbytheinch.com/45colt.html
 
There is no separate data for different barrel lengths. They tell you the barrel length so you can judge the velocity you will achieve. Data is worked up using pressure limits, not barrel lengths or velocities. If you want a different velocity change powders.

Why do you want a specific velocity? Why 850fps with a 250gr XTP? IMO accuracy is more important than velocity. More information will help us help you.

Welcome back to THR...
Why? Hunting. Accuracy is nice for paper. Hunting requires enough penetration and accuracy to hunt black bears and wild hogs...not to mention deer. In developing loads for hunting you have to find a compromise between accuracy and firepower....leaning toward penetration and stopping power.
 
There is no separate data for different barrel lengths. They tell you the barrel length so you can judge the velocity you will achieve. Data is worked up using pressure limits, not barrel lengths or velocities. If you want a different velocity change powders.

Why do you want a specific velocity? Why 850fps with a 250gr XTP? IMO accuracy is more important than velocity. More information will help us help you.

Welcome back to THR...
Why? Hunting. Accuracy is key if all you shoot is paper. But when hunting, you need a load strong enough for the game you are hunting. Your load must provide deep enough penetration, sufficient wound capacity to kill the game quickly, and as accurate as possible. Some reloading manuals such as Hornady will recommend an accuracy load, and a hunting load. When hunting black bears in the northeast, you want to be sure your load is sufficiently capable of taking the game. Yes, I could use a 44 magnum or greater, but I choose the 45 Colt because it has taken such game throughout many years. I could also hunt such game with some horribly outrageous magnum rifle as well, but I choose not to. Velocity makes ft/lbs. Ft/lbs create stopping power. etc etc....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top