I'm confused on this issue. Here is why.
Here on THR, many many times I have read that in general, .223 is more accurate than 5.56mm even out of a 5.56mm gun.
However, in a recent magazine article, I read just the opposite, that due to the longer lead with 5.56mm, .223 will not properly fill the chamber of a 5.56mm gun, and will reduce accuracy as compared to 5.56mm out of a 5.56mm gun.
So which is it - out of a 5.56mm gun, which would be more accurate - .223 or 5.56mm assuming both are using the same bullet (take Hornady TAP for example where the .223 and the 5.56mm version can use the same bullet). Assume that the distance being shot at is the maximum effective distance .223 allows (just for the sake of maximizing deviation from POA).
I currently have mostly 5.56mm TAP. However, it is even easier to get .223 TAP. Right now I'm just concentrating on accuracy. Not potential for over penetration, not stopping power, not effective range, etc.
Here on THR, many many times I have read that in general, .223 is more accurate than 5.56mm even out of a 5.56mm gun.
However, in a recent magazine article, I read just the opposite, that due to the longer lead with 5.56mm, .223 will not properly fill the chamber of a 5.56mm gun, and will reduce accuracy as compared to 5.56mm out of a 5.56mm gun.
So which is it - out of a 5.56mm gun, which would be more accurate - .223 or 5.56mm assuming both are using the same bullet (take Hornady TAP for example where the .223 and the 5.56mm version can use the same bullet). Assume that the distance being shot at is the maximum effective distance .223 allows (just for the sake of maximizing deviation from POA).
I currently have mostly 5.56mm TAP. However, it is even easier to get .223 TAP. Right now I'm just concentrating on accuracy. Not potential for over penetration, not stopping power, not effective range, etc.