Ammo choice...180 gr vs. 200 gr .357 Magnum?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Aug 1, 2005
Messages
249
Location
Louisiana
My son and I are going to be spending some backpacking time in the lower Rocky Mountains this summer. For the ease of convenience we are leaving the long-barreled .357s back at the house in Louisiana. However, we do want something for self-defense on the trail and at camp and have decided to take our 2.75" barreled Speed-Sixes .357 Magnums. We want to stoke them up as much as possible...yes...we know these are not cannons in this caliber and barrel length and are marginal against some mountain creatures. However, with some wisdom and limiting shots to close range ( 20 yards or less ) I think we should fair well.

We have been doing some ammo research and are leaning towards some hardcast rounds. Right now, Double Tap ammo has our attention. If we go with this ammo which of the two listed below would ya'll choose and why?

Caliber: 357 Magnum
Bullet: 180gr. Wide Flat Nose Gas Check Hardcast
Velocity: 1300fps / 4" Ruger GP-100
1420fps / 6"bbl S&W 686
Muzzle Energy: 676 ft. lbs.

OR.......................

Caliber: 357 Magnum
Bullet: 200gr. Wide Flat Nose Gas Check Hardcast
Velocity: 1200fps / 4" Ruger GP-100
1315fps / 6"bbl S&W 686
Muzzle Energy: 640 ft. lbs.

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
I can't help you much in making that choice. It looks to me, however, that you have done your research well and have a couple of really good choices. I think your bullet choice is really good-the hard cast, gas check, flat nose ones will PENETRATE almost forever. For your choice, I, too, like HEAVY bullets. I have never used anything bigger than the 180's though.

Be sure to shoot them to see where the point of impact is cause it may be different with heavy bullets (different than what you may otherwise be using).

Either one will make you guys well armed. Good luck.
 
I am going to be using 180s, I have shot a bunch of 180 gr XTPs and I am going to cast some of my own 180gr wide flat point gas checks, and those over 15 grs of Lil' gun ought to do the trick for me here in eastern Pennsylvania.
 
Excellent choices! Glad you narrowed it down to cast bullets.

I really like 180's in .357. That is what I'd opt for, and will be carrying this fall during deer season. I also shoot the XTP's, but am switching over to WFN's. I also got a 173 gr. Keith to try.

I am converting to shooting everything lead. The 3 different jacketed are the last boxes I have. When they're gone, they're gone. Here's what's on my bench right now in .357/.358:

Left to right:

173 gr. Keith
180 gr. WFN (you can't tell in the picture, but it has a MONSTER meplat. Almost caliber!)
158 gr. RN
148 gr. HBWC
148 gr. DEWC
140 gr. RNFP
125 gr. RNFP
180 gr. Hornday XTP
158 gr. Sierra JHC
125 gr. Sierra SP

P1010454.jpg
 
Federal Premium Vitalshok 180 gr. Hardcast....weak??

You know it is a shame. Originally, I was looking at some of this Federal ammo while at my local gun shop. It is sold at several stores in town so it is easy to purchase. But, in comparison it is very weak. And, after taxes cost more than a $1 per shell. Look at the info below. Why don't they make it stouter so we don't have to mail order other brands?

Caliber: 357 Magnum
Bullet: 180 gr. CastCore

Velocity: 1240 fps / 10" bbl
Muzzle Energy: 615 ft. lbs.

Velocity: 1130 fps / 6"bbl
Muzzle Energy: 510 ft. lbs.

Which, if my numbers are correct, translates into an even more puny performance from my 2.75" barreled Ruger Speed-Six:

Velocity: 980 fps
Muzzle Energy: 384 ft. lbs.

I hope that my numbers are not correct...anybody else calculate them differently?

Thanks
 
I put a vote in for Buffalo Bore heavy .357 loads. Their hard cast 180gr is pretty stout.

1. 3 inch S&W J frame

a. Item 19A/20-180gr. Hard cast LFN = 1302 fps
b. Item 19B/20-170gr. JHC (jacketed hollow cavity) = 1299 fps
c. Item 19C/20-158gr. Speer Uni Core = 1398 fps
d. Item 19D/20-125gr. Speer Uni Core = 1476 fps
 
I'd go with Buffalo Bore or handload equivalent (okay, well, I DO go with the handload equivalent) in 180 grains. Here, you're talkin' 1306 fps, 662 ft lbs from a 2.3" Ruger SP101, 1400 fps/785 ft lbs from a 6.5" Blackhawk, both my guns over my chronograph temps in the high 80s. My personal load uses a 180 grain Hornady XTP over 13.8 grains of AA#9. Work up to it, it's hot.

My general utility load is milder, an old stand by. I cast a 158 grain gas checked bullet from a Lee mold (large meplat) over 14.5 grains 2400. I get 450 ft lbs or so from the SP101 and 760 ft lbs from the 6.5" Blackhawk, 1200 ft lbs (approx) from my 20" Rossi 92. I've killed three deer with the load, 1 from the Rossi about 80 yards, the other two from the Blackhawk at 30-50 yards. I get 600 ft lbs from my 4" Taurus M66 with this load and it's easy on K frame guns and accurate. It makes for a decent carry load for back packing.
 
FPS difference per inch???

Here, you're talkin' 1306 fps, 662 ft lbs from a 2.3" Ruger SP101, 1400 fps/785 ft lbs from a 6.5" Blackhawk

MCgunner,
When I ask about the difference in fps as related to barrel length I usually am instructed to subtract 50 fps per loss of barrel inch. I noticed here that did not apply here with your numbers. Does that have something to do with the bullet weight?

If I use the figure of 22.38 fps loss per inch difference then my 2.75" Speed-Six would generate about 1,050 fps in velocity and 441 fpe using the Federal ammo I mentioned. Still not up to par with the Buffalo Bore and Double Tap, but a significant jump.

By the way, outside of a more velocity and energy from the Buffalo Bore, are their other reasons ya'll would prefer it over Double Tap?

Thanks
 
I have shot a lot of Double Tap 158 gr and a few 180 gr out of my 50th Ruger Blackhawk in .357. They are very stout loads and I think they as good or better than BB and they cost less.
A 180 gr .357 in either make should take care of your needs.
 
Get yourself a chronograph. I'd be very surprised if you do better than 900fps from a 2 3/4 barrel, and that would be a bonafide wrist-wrencher. I don't know what you intend to shoot at. All that load will do to a Grizzly is make him mad, and it's way more than you need for most other purposes.
 
I am going to be using 180s, I have shot a bunch of 180 gr XTPs and I am going to cast some of my own 180gr wide flat point gas checks, and those over 15 grs of Lil' gun ought to do the trick for me here in eastern Pennsylvania.
Like Brian, I have been testing a 180gr Hornady XTP over 15gr of Lil'gun and it's a great load IMO. If you don't reload and are going to buy a heavy .357 Magnum round I would go with the180gr Hard Cast DoubleTap round. Since both the DoubleTap and Buffalo Bore rounds are so close in velocity I would buy DoubleTap on price alone. I would stick with the 180gr bullet because of the velocity that possible and because IMO shooting a 200gr bullet from such a short barrel revolver would be punishing for both you and the revolver.
 
I have fired quite a bit of the Federal 180gr load out of a 2.75" SS and a 2.5" 66. Even that load is a real thumper with factory grips. BTW, the 66 developed substantial endplay as a result of these loads. The SS is still holding up fine.
 
Yep, great choice with the 180 gn. hard cast lead flat nose! That's your best choice in those wheelguns for your purposes.

I hunt deer with a S&W M29-5 in .44 magnum and have used hardcast lead flatnose bullets now for many years, after giving up on the touted hollowpoints (after shooting a big doe at 10 FEET with a Hornady 240 XTP factory load) and not even getting a blood trail. Another hunter harvested that doe the next week in a food plot and my mushroomed bullet fell out. Until he skinned it, he had no idea that deer had ever been shot, the way it was walking and all! One of those freak things.

For me, I want a bullet that will penetrate and not stop when in the deep woods and thus I no longer use hollowpoints.

With my load today (300 grain Castcore Federal) I don't lose deer and they rarely run at all. I imagine you'll have similar results with the 180gn in your .357. In case of a bear attack that bullet SHOULD push on through and hit something that will put your BROWN bear down. Even with lower velocities in the short tubed wheelguns that wide flat nose will punch on through and keep you protected well.

Hope you have a great time!

T.
 
Well I shot a TON of Keith 173 grain bullets out of a 4" M-27 and a 2.5" Model 66 starting in the mid 70's. I did use 14.5 grain of 2400 BUT you better not make any mistakes and watch the primers (type and cratering ect.)and what cases you use as that load is hot! I got 1280 fps out of a 4" barrel and 1100 from the 2.5" . Cast hard they will go thru a deer like butter and also 400 pound hogs! I shot a couple black bears that ran into me in the 70's and 80's and with multiple hits it worked OK. That said the old Corbon 200 grain hard cast was even hotter and nastier.
Nowadays I use the 180 Win Partition Gold.1000+ fps in the 2.5" and 1100+ in the 4". This eliminates the big bugaboo of those heavy cast bullet loads in guns that have lots of muzzle flip-bullet creep! Nothing like a tied up gun when you need a 2nd shot! The 173 Keith wasn't bad as it had well designed crimp grooves which stopped it IF properly crimped . The other designs are iffy at best.
 
jameslovesjammie,
What is the make on the 180WFN??

The thing to keep in mind with cast bullets is the widest meplate possable will deliver the most leathality, I am waiting fro Ranch Dog to finish he R&D on his new 190gr WFNGC which is also a tumble lube
 
...some backpacking time in the lower Rocky Mountains this summer. ... We want to stoke them up as much as possible...yes...we know these are not cannons in this caliber and barrel length and are marginal against some mountain creatures.

In case of a bear attack that bullet SHOULD push on through and hit something that will put your BROWN bear down.
I'm a biologist, backpacker and mountaineer who walked for decades in the San Juans of southern Colorado.

Never once did I see (or hear or read of) griz (Brown bear) or sign of them.

They are probably extinct there. You'll find them in Idaho, but not Colorado.

Black bear won't stand up against your .357 mag, even if they attack,
which is extremely rare unless you're foolish enough to keep food in your tent at night
or get between them and their cubs (very unlikely).

I now live in Oregon, and even here (no griz), I'm perfectly comfortable with .357 mag in the outback.
I carry it for 2-legged predators, not bear. I'm FAR more concerned with nutzoid humans in the outback than bears.
 
I'm FAR more concerned with nutzoid humans in the outback than bears.

Amen to that. My best friend's dad has told us stories of backpacking in the Bob Marshall Wilderness here in Montana about 25 years ago. "The Bob" is renowned for its remoteness and for its grizzly bear population, and I believe it is the largest area of wilderness in the contiguous 48.

Anyways, he said there were many times when he was within 10 feet of full grown grizzly bears. They never once charged or threatened him in anyway. They are just as scared of us as we are of them. He just said "hey bear" and stood his ground. He never carried a gun. In fact I don't think he has ever owned a gun.

If you are really worried about bears get yourself a canister of bear spray. I know it doesn't sound as cool but it's probably more effective than a .357 Mag will be.
 
For dangerous big game

I'd go heavier. Make sure you buy enough boxes to get an idea of what kind of recoil to expect when cranking them off in those short barrels though.
 
JakeH, The Bitteroot-Selway is the largest wilderness area, and I guess the "hey bear" method was tested by Timothy Treadwell. It don't work. mtmuley
 
I just googled it and the Bitterroot-Selway Wilderness is actually the 3rd largest, but is bigger than the Bob Marshall. The Bob Marshall is the biggest in Montana though. I guess we were both wrong.

That was an old rogue bear that killed him, and those are the bears you have to worry about. Hence my recommendation for bear spray.
 
Here's an interesting story about grizzlies that was on the news and in the papers about 3 years ago.

An older guy was hunting in southwestern Montana when he came upon a grizzly sow and two cubs. He claimed the bear charged him and that he shot the sow in the head. It was either a .270 Winchester or .270 Weatherby high-powered rifle (can't remember exactly but it was one of the two). There was a hearing because the evidence showed that the bear had not charged him, which is incriminating since Grizzlies are on the endangered list. The bear had been shot in the SIDE of the head, which is just about impossible if the bear is charging you.

Anyways, the bullet did not even pierce the skull, and the bear lived. It knocked the bear unconscious for a few hours, and the bear showed signs of serious head trauma for a few weeks after. If I remember correctly it made a full recovery without any human intervention.

My point being, a .357 Magnum is not near as powerful as a .270 rifle. Good luck!
 
Yep, The Bitteroot-Selway spills into Idaho. I forgot. My bear spray is still a six gun though. mtmuley jake, you probably like wolves too, don't you?
 
I too live in the San Juan area of Colorado and I have run into two bears on separate occasions. My friend has run into three bears also on separate occasions. This has all happened in the last few years as the bear population seems to be on the rise (don't quote me on this). I feel quite comfortable with carrying my S&W 686+ 4" with 180gr BB. Just the same, be on the watch for mountain lion as there have also been a rash of sightings over the last few years. My last land lord was stalked up onto a tall water tank when the cat was after her small dog. The LEOs had to go get her. Here are a few links to the local paper that has highlighted separate mountain lion incidents within the last two years.

http://www.durangoherald.com/asp-bi...e=news&article_path=/news/07/news070228_1.htm
http://www.durangoherald.com/asp-bi...pe=out&article_path=/outdoors/out070502_1.htm
http://www.durangoherald.com/asp-bi...e=news&article_path=/news/08/news080208_5.htm
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top