" And that's just our women folk"

Status
Not open for further replies.

jsalcedo

Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2002
Messages
3,683
http://www.sacbee.com/content/news/story/8228308p-9159238c.html


Firing nine rounds from two handguns, a 53-year-old Rancho Cordova woman fended off an intruder Thursday night after he crashed through her sliding glass door.
William Kriske, a 47-year-old parolee, was treated for a gunshot wound to the arm, then taken to jail and arrested on suspicion of burglary and resisting arrest, according to Sacramento County Sheriff's Sgt. Lou Fatur.

"It was one of those nights. I have a few holes in my glass out front," Carolyn Lisle said Friday.



"That's OK, I don't think he'll be back," said Lisle, who emptied one .357 revolver at the intruder before she retrieved a second one and he crashed through another window to flee.

"I was trying to miss my furniture. Priorities, right?" Lisle said.

Lisle, shaken but spirited, recounted her night that started as a quiet evening of TV with three friends and two dogs in her living room.

At about 9 p.m., a noise at the sliding door prompted a male visitor to get up to investigate, but Lisle dashed to a back room to get one of her guns.

"I knew it couldn't be good," Lisle said.

When the intruder shattered the glass, Lisle's three guests fled from the house. Lisle stood her ground and opened fire.

"He was like a mosquito hitting the window. Every time he turned around, poweee," she said.

Lisle wasn't sure the intruder was alone so she nervously watched her back as she squeezed off rounds.

When she emptied one gun, she still hadn't hit him. And he wasn't gone.

"He was still in the garage, flitting around," she said.

She went to get another gun -- "I like to be prepared," she said -- and waited to see his next move. After tearing up the garage, he finally broke out through a garage window, but he veered toward Lisle's front door. She fired again, hitting him at least once.

The bleeding intruder ran across the street and tried to hot-wire a motorcycle, but its owners, already armed to come to Lisle's aid, chased off the would-be thief, she said.

She said one of the men yelled after the retreating burglar: "And that's just our womenfolk."

A California Highway Patrol officer stopped the suspect a short distance away and sheriff's deputies arrested Kriske.

Lisle is still puzzled why someone would break into a well-lit living room with four people and two dogs.

"It was like he was out to hurt someone," she said.

Fatur said a prowler had been reported moving through neighborhood back yards at about the time Lisle's house was invaded.

Lisle, who said her guns are registered, will not face criminal charges, Fatur said. California law allows someone to use deadly force whenever a reasonable person believes an intruder poses a threat to kill.

Lisle is the second homeowner in the Sacramento area this year to use deadly force against an intruder. In January, a Sacramento man shot and killed one of two armed intruders who broke into his home. He wasn't charged.

Studies done to determine whether gun ownership deters crime have only stirred more controversy because of the way statistics are gathered and analyzed, and the way people recall their experiences, said William Vizzard, chair of the criminal justice department at California State University, Sacramento.

"We tend to see ourselves as heroic rather than idiotic," said Vizzard, who is also a 30-year law enforcement veteran.

Vizzard, who has studied major research and written on gun issues, said two of the most prominent surveys differ dramatically in results, showing anywhere from 150,000 people a year to 2.5 million who claim success in thwarting crime with a gun.

"The answer is, no one can say for sure at the end of the day that the presence of a firearm doesn't increase your risk of getting injured, nor does it reduce your risk," he said.

Lisle is pretty sure where she stands: "You need protection in this day and age."

A retired state worker who once worked as a correctional officer, she did admit that she hadn't been to a shooting range lately: "After last night, I might go once in a while."



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
And yes, while her efforts did pay off, I'll bet she is at the range very soon. 1:6 ratio hits on the bad guy is a good thing so long as they are not carrying firearms too. Could have been a lot worse for her in such circumstances. Looks like her friends don't think much of her marksmanship:D
 
The most important part is how the Sacramento Bee, and Vizzard, addressed the risk of owning firearms. More papers need to be so objective.
 
"I was trying to miss my furniture. Priorities, right?" Lisle said

I dunno, but I think she needs to get her priorities straight :scrutiny: .

"We tend to see ourselves as heroic rather than idiotic," said Vizzard, who is also a 30-year law enforcement veteran.

I wouldn't call her idiotic (she had two guns, which is two more than a lot of people ;) ) but what if that parole had a gun as well and instead of running, tried to fight? Would she still care that much about her furniture? Don't mean to be too critical since I've never been in a similiar situation, but her actions, while humorous after the fact, could have produced a less positive result. My 2 cents.
 
I'd say she dun good. Hey--nice furniture can be expensive, and it's great to know that she was level-headed enough to be taking that into consideration :D

And "Granny," cool9mm? 53 ain't that old :)
 
Vizzard, who has studied major research and written on gun issues, said two of the most prominent surveys differ dramatically in results, showing anywhere from 150,000 people a year to 2.5 million who claim success in thwarting crime with a gun.

"The answer is, no one can say for sure at the end of the day that the presence of a firearm doesn't increase your risk of getting injured, nor does it reduce your risk," he said.
Really? :confused: Sure seems to have made a vast difference in ONLY 150,000 PEOPLE at the low end and 2.5 million PEOPLE at the upper! Does the CHP regulate themselves to batons & tasers only? Why not? Sheesh...
 
The Texan view...

I just hate to tell y'all (jsalcedo excepted) what a good Texan woman would've done to this perp...well, not really. Here goes:

First, she'd not have cared about the furniture ('ceptin' for the critters mounted on the wall).

Second, real Texan women don't need any 9 rounds to hit some BG once, even if he's "flittin'".

Third, with two guns, she'd have still shot at least 12 times, and maybe more, just to make sure (can't ever tell if'n its one a them thar zombie critters, so just keep shootin').

Fourth, what the heck happened to her REAL guns - you know, the ones that begin with at least .4?

Finally, what's this about "went" to get another gun? Shoot, just reach to yer other side, inside the bra, or yer boot...

And that's just OUR womenfolk.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top