mcb
Member
Same configuration doesn't mean the same rifle. The 6920 is built to correct spec using the correct materials and testing proceedures. I was issued a "just as good" Bushmaster years ago. They just flat out didn't hold up to real training use. The rifles were constantly down at training days. My rifle broke several times and went through a set of gas rings every 6 months or so. After we switched back to Colt rifles the issues went away. My 6920 is somewhere around 12 to 13 thousand rounds and has never been down.
When you use your rifle for more than range work a properly built one gives you ease of mind and a much lower chance of failure in a gunfight.
All that being said I like PSA. I have several of their rifles and just picked up one of their AKs. But if it goes down at my house I'm grabbing either my Colt or my Colt-BCM franken gun.
That is interesting but sort of misses my main point. I am not a soldier. I have zero interest or use for an AR configured like 6920. For that matter I don't have much interest in ARs chambered in 556. Most of my ARs at chambered in other cartridges. And they are configured for the activities I enjoy, hunting, practical shooting games etc. If I suddenly felt the need for an M4orgery I could build one from any number of sources for significant less cost than Colt and depending on my druthers I could build it as reliable if not more so than a 6920. There is nothing special about Colt or Mil-Spec. In the current AR market there is plenty of performance above mil spec to be had if you want to go find it. There is also much more affordable if that is your preference.