Autocorrect would have gotten me for sure on that one.like the crappy blue jobs on some new 1911 Colts and the repro 1903s. Not to say new blue jobs are always crappy,
Has nothing to do with the bluing. It's all in the polishing.Not to say new blue jobs are always crappy, but they sure aren't the deep blues of 50+ years ago.
Autocorrect would have gotten me for sure on that one.
Has nothing to do with the bluing. It's all in the polishing.
I think the difference is a $50k resto on a ‘57 chevy “can” actually net you a hefty profit. But a firearms resto (in the eyes of most owners) reduces the value. It may make it worth more than it was originally. But there’s a limit.Shooters are so weird about restorations. Spending $50,000 fully restoring a `57 Chevy in sad shape is perfectly acceptable. High end British bespoke guns like $100,000 H&H and Westley-Richards would get restored all the time but somehow doing so with a $500 gun is unthinkable.
I get Doug Turnbull's newsletter because of the pictures of the remarkable firearms he restores. Here's an example I thought some of you would like to see.
View attachment 830215
View attachment 830216
I get Doug Turnbull's newsletter because of the pictures of the remarkable firearms he restores. Here's an example I thought some of you would like to see.
View attachment 830215
View attachment 830216