Best 45-70 lever gun?

Whats the best .45-70 lever gun?

  • the Winchester 1886, repro or original

    Votes: 17 29.8%
  • The Marlin 1895

    Votes: 34 59.6%
  • The Henry

    Votes: 6 10.5%
  • Other

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    57
The best is the 1886. The 1886 is stronger by far and the most robust. It locks up like a bank vault. #1 I'd say the Browning 1886 repro. Modern steels but without the silly tang safety.

#2 The later Winchesters. Only second because of the tang safety/rebounding hammer but it's not really a deal breaker. They are made in different variations that some might find more useful. I like the Extra Light.

#3 The current production Pedersoli 1886's.

#4 The Marlin 1895. Good guns but not as strong as the 1886. Its only advantage is they're usually more affordable and easy to mount an optic on. Oddly, it's the only one I own. Not sure they have an affordably advantage any more.
 
Oddly enough, as a lever gun fan first and foremost I don't own any 45-70's. Shot a fair number of them over the years...That could change overnight of Ruger reintroduces the cowboy version that Marlin used to produce. I missed the train on those when it ran regularly but if it ever pulls up on the platform again I'll be on it.
 
For me it's the Marlin 1895 LTD's 1- 4 or the "Thin" forearm Cowboy series "26in" barrels. Otherwise, the forearms look and feel fat.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I really have no idea which is the best .45-70. The only one I have ever shot is the one I own. It is a Henry Big Boy Steel and it has a recoil pad. When I bought it, Remington was making the Marlins and most reviews were not good.
I am very satisfied with the Henry and the loading gate is not a deal breaker for me. I do know one thing after shooting some stout loads through this rifle. I do not want a scope on it and do not want one with a brass butt plate. For me, a recoil pad is a must.
Don't know which one is best. I'm happy with my Henry and am not looking to buy another .45-70.
 
If Ruger/Marlin reintroduced the 1895 CB I'd have to think long and hard about not doing something silly like buying one. My JM 1895G would get jealous...
Ditto! I have been resisting the urge to buy a Ruglin for sometime now.
 
Standard 1895 works just fine. Shortened the stock and installed a grind to fit pad. Lightly compressed benchmark and 300 grain hornady is more than enough for big deer and my shoulder. Kicks too much to just shoot for the fun of it. 300 grain cast and a light 1300 fps is a hoot
 
When I was a kid back before dirt, the local gun shop had Winchester 1886 in .45-90 on the wall. I've wanted an 1886 ever since. I have a Marlin 1893 in .38-55 made in 1904. That and a JM 336 .30-30 does it for centerfire lever guns. But I would be sorely tempted if the right 1886 came my way.
 
I bought a new Remlin gg during those transition years... I load the hornady 350s fp ... It has been a fun gun to load for and i never had any problems.... i feel its more or less a marlin, so i gotta say marlin..... I do like the comfort of the 45/70 when hikeing in big sky country.
 
I was never really a fan of lever guns until I got my 1895 (with the load data/components from the previous owner, meticulous fellow), it shoots 1.5 MOA with loads that have more felt recoil than my 50 BMG.
"LimbSaver" recoil pad, Trapdoor loads and cast bullets make mine pleasant to shoot.

I won't subject myself to the unnecessary abuse of hotter loads.
Could be I'm not tough enough to take it, or maybe I'm smart enough to know the damage is cumulative?🤔
 
Yeah, my buddy makes fun of me all the time, “You know, for a guy that likes shooting 50 BMG’s so much, you sure have a lot of .22’s.”. Guess it comes from my Father who once told me, “Don’t mess up my good welding gloves, picking up that hot steel plate, your skin will grow back.”
 
"LimbSaver" recoil pad, Trapdoor loads and cast bullets make mine pleasant to shoot.

I won't subject myself to the unnecessary abuse of hotter loads.
Could be I'm not tough enough to take it, or maybe I'm smart enough to know the damage is cumulative?🤔
Well you had to learn somehow. When I tried the lyman marlin loads from my bench the fore stock jumped out of my hand and the scope knocked my hat off. That was the end of that experementing. 300 grain gas check from a lyman mold at 1300 fps and 300 gr hornady hp at 1900 is enough for anything on this farm.
 
There was a guy picking his new Ruger Marlin 45-70 up at a LGS a few months ago when I had a firearm coming in. He let me take a look at it - it was a pretty sharp looking rifle.

I'm more of a 30-30 guy myself but I think those are also back in production now - the 336. I never was crazy about the micro groove they used to have but the ones with regular rifling are okay especially for casters. If I see a new 336 at a local shop, I may grab one of those up if the timing is right. I can't see the irons on my 94 anymore so...
 
I love the looks of the JMB designed Winchester lever guns, they just sing to me when I look at them.

But the 1895 Marlin is a great gun, IMHO, with a bit more versatility due to the solid top design.

I bought my 1899G back in the 1990’s when they came with the factory porting. It has a Lyman peep rear sight and has been a great rifle for sending 400 grain bullets down range.

A couple of years ago in a pawn shop, I spotted a used but spotless 1895CB with the 26” octagon barrel. (If it fired more than 10 shots I will be surprised.) I added a Williams peep to this rifle, and it has also been a fun gun to shoot.

IMG_1098.jpeg

I did add recoil pads to both, the CB plastic buttplate wasn’t much fun and the rock-hard G pad was no better. Recoil isn’t as sharp as it was, which is fine by me. (A crescent buttplate on an 1886 would be zero fun for me!)

Both are great guns, you really can’t go wrong with either one. If you plan on scoping, red dotting or even using a receiver mounted peep, go with an 1895. If traditional looks mean more, an 1886. Both will sling big lead bullets very well!

Stay safe.
 
Back
Top