Brady Campaign vs NRA effectiveness?

Status
Not open for further replies.

valnar

Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2003
Messages
1,864
Location
Ohio
Every now & then I go to the Brady website to see what the opposition is up to. Of course....everything they are trying to achieve is exactly the opposite of what we want. So that got me thinking..... How effective is the Brady campaign? Or more importantly, how effective is the NRA against the Brady campaign? Are they making inroads against our 2nd amendment rights? Or is the sheer power and numbers of the NRA doing a good job against them?

Just curious.
 
I looked on the Brady website and looked at the section titled "What Plaxico Burress Has To Say About Guns". This is an excerpt from his Wikipedia page;

Wikipedia said:
Accidental shooting

On November 28, 2008, Burress suffered an accidental self-inflicted gunshot wound to the right thigh in the New York City nightclub LQ when his Glock pistol, tucked in the waistband of his sweatpants, began sliding down his leg; apparently in reaching for the gun he inadvertently depressed the trigger, causing the gun to fire.[15] However, the Manhattan District Attorney stated Burress was in fact wearing jeans.[16] The injury was not life-threatening and he was released from an area hospital the next afternoon.[17] Two days later, Burress turned himself in to police to face charges of criminal possession of a handgun.[18] It was later discovered that New York City police learned about the incident only after seeing it on television and were not called by New York-Presbyterian Hospital as required by law. New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg called the hospital actions an "outrage" and stated that they are a "chargeable offense". Bloomberg also urged that Burress be prosecuted to the fullest extent, saying that any punishment short of the minimum 3½ years for unlawful carrying of a handgun would be "a mockery of the law."[19][20] Burress had an expired (concealed carry (CCW)) license from Florida, but no New York license.(sic)
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plaxico_Burress

What a role model for gun control we have here.
 
If the Brady Bunch were smart they'd get into the moving truck rental bizness. 'Cuz their greatest benefit to us pro-gunners is showing us which states to move to.....:D
 
The Brady Campaign is barely a footnote, now. Our fights are now in the courts and legislatures of many states and cities.
And our greatest enemy is our own complacency.
 
It's all about professional fundraising, on both sides of the issue. The Brady Campaign needs the NRA to demonize, just as the NRA needs the Brady Campaign (and other antigun organizations) to demonize. Make no mistake -- some very lucrative livelihoods are being made here. (That's quite apart from the actual merits of their cases. Gun control is a politically losing issue, except in a few small areas of the country.)
 
I too frequent their site. I want to know what they are up to. I don't think we should completely ignore them. Look at what the fools did in 1994. Fortunately, the things they wanted have not come to pass. I think that Heller and McDonald in particular took a lot of wind out of those organizations sails.
 
Thanks you TexasRifleman, you just made my day.

LOL yeah it's fun to look at but it doesn't honestly tell the whole story. Click the link in my post and the rest of it is told there. The money still comes in, just that Brady Campaign has been moving it to different places. Still not as much coming in, but they have been siphoning cash into other "foundations" and places for some reason.
 
I'll smile and laugh about this all day. Maybe all weekend.

Has anybody checked out the kids and guns area? What I took away from that was that kids should go get an adult if they find a gun. Pretty much the same as the NRA message. What I thought was interesting was how the Brady site made gun "owners" appear as social misfits.

This reminds me; Time to renew my NRA membership. Then maybe a little range time.
 
@TexasRifleman

On one hand, I look at the trajectory of that chart and smile. On the other hand, I'm still perturbed that they are getting $3 Million at last count. You can do a lot of damage with that.

Anyone know what the annual contributions to the NRA are?
 
Anyone know what the annual contributions to the NRA are?

I don't know much about the tax laws but apparently it's difficult to get a clear idea when you figure in all the various foundations and groups of NRA.

I have seen $200 million a year quoted before in articles. I've also seen it quoted many times that about 46% of contributions go to fundraising so the amount of money actually used for the stated purposes of NRA has to have that factored in. This seemed awfully high to me when I first saw it but I looked at other large charities, foundations, etc and it seems to be just the nature of things in organizations of this size.
 
The Brady Campaign is not very effective by itself. The NRA outdoes its levels of activities several times over. Notice how national candidates don't try to represent themselves as gun controllers but everyone tries to get some NRA cred and support no matter what. Even if it's just a quick mention at a town hall q&a session that they hunted maybe once as a kid, or believe in respect the rights of sportsmen. Now in colleges and universities, the Brady Campaign is pretty much ascendant.
 
Considering they are nearly broke, and have not been successful in....well....just about anything recently....shows me they aren't very effective at what they TRY to do
 
Now in colleges and universities, the Brady Campaign is pretty much ascendant.
I haven't found that attitude down here in TX but I have found that common sense is not as common on college campuses today as it was my first time through over a decade ago. So I guess I can see how that's possible.
 
The only things the Brady Campaign has going for them are Joyce Foundation money and Collin Goddard as a spokesperson.

They, along with most of the other antigun oganizations from the 1970s are really kind of dying on the vine.

Sent from my myTouch_4G_Slide using Tapatalk
 
They are definitely on the losing side right now, Heller and McDonald yanked the rug out from under them. I could see them slipping away and retooling under a new name, or merging with a organization with similar goals. Just because they are down doesn't mean that any of them are giving up.
 
There's also an "enthusiasm gap," otherwise known as "whose ox is getting gored." The supporters of the Brady Campaign, and other anti-gunners, almost by definition, are not gun owners. Other than a few that have had untoward gun incidents, their interest in guns is ideological and detached from direct experience. The point is, their proposed legislation doesn't directly affect them. On the other hand, NRA members are gun owners and would directly suffer from further restrictions. So, Brady Campaign supporters can walk away from the organization when their interest wanes, or they run into hard times economically. Not so NRA members and gun owners.
 
I don't know much about the tax laws but apparently it's difficult to get a clear idea when you figure in all the various foundations and groups of NRA.

I have seen $200 million a year quoted before in articles. I've also seen it quoted many times that about 46% of contributions go to fundraising so the amount of money actually used for the stated purposes of NRA has to have that factored in. This seemed awfully high to me when I first saw it but I looked at other large charities, foundations, etc and it seems to be just the nature of things in organizations of this size.
How much of that is NRA-ILA funding?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top