bulletin received from Citizens Committee makes interesting reading

Status
Not open for further replies.

alan

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
2,601
Location
sowest pa.
NEWS RELEASE
BRAZIL VOTE SHOWS CITIZENS THE WORLD OVER CHOOSE FIREARM FREEDOM OVER FALSE SECURITY, SAYS CCRKBA
BELLEVUE, WA -- Sunday's landmark rejection by Brazilian citizens of a proposed nationwide gun ban demonstrates that when given a choice, people around the world will opt for freedom and the security of personal firearms ownership over the false promises of government, the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms (CCRKBA) said today.

"With nearly 100 percent of the votes counted, it appears that 64 percent of Brazilian voters opposed the idea of giving up their firearms," said CCRKBA Chairman Alan Gottlieb. "History has demonstrated that when people are disarmed, they are at the mercy of predators who have no mercy, and governments that all too often oppress people rather than protect them from evil.

"Take, for example, the views of taxi driver Mohammed Osei, who was quoted by CNN," Gottlieb noted. "When asked why he voted against the nationwide gun ban, he explained matter-of-factly, 'I don't like people walking around armed on the street. But since all the bandits have guns, you need to have a gun at home'."

Gottlieb noted that the track record of Brazil's proposed gun ban was much the same as similar proposals here in the United States. Early on, polling suggested that the gun ban had the support of 80 percent of the population. However, as the election approached, that support began to evaporate, especially after both sides were given free air time on television to present their cases.

"It never fails," said Gottlieb, "that when citizens are presented with facts instead of emotionalism and rhetoric, they choose firearms freedom every time. Brazilian citizens understand that you vote freedom away only once, and when you surrender it, through referendum or initiative, you never get it back.

"The Brazil vote should stand as a lesson to global anti-gunners," Gottlieb observed. "The people they want to disarm through their global gun control efforts don't care to be left defenseless. Citizens who enjoy firearms freedom are not likely to give up that essential cornerstone of liberty. Gun banners, whether they roam the halls of the United Nations, or the streets of San Francisco, need to be reminded of that every day, and certainly on every election day.

"The vote in Brazil was a victory for freedom," Gottlieb concluded, "and a strong message for those zealots who would take away that freedom."


-END-

Posters note:

I do NOT know what, if any claims were made by the anti gunners in Brazil, regarding what they might have described as Public Support For This Gun Ban, however in this country, that is not the case, as we frequently hear about the results of polls, that supposedly show strong public support for Gun Control in the U.S.

Re such caims, so far as I'm aware, the subject of Gun Bans, excluding the upcoming vote in San Francisco, have twice, been the subject of referenda where individual voters had the opportunity to directly voice their opinions.

These referenda were held some years back, in Calif. and Mass. In each case, the proposals were handily defeated, with the vote tallies running better than 60% opposed, as I recall. No explaination for their lop sided defeats was ever offered, by the anti gunners, something that interested parties might have found interesting.

While the leanings of the public might have shifted over a number of years, the anti's claims of public support for their proposals these days, if they still make such claims, seem more questionable than they were years ago, when referenda results showed that the people, given the opportunity to speak their minds, were not buying the snake oil of Gun Bans/Gun Control being offered. Looks like the same results were obtained in Brazil.
 
The people they want to disarm through their global gun control efforts don't care to be left defenseless.

Brazil's leftist extremists should never have embarked upon a battle they weren't sure in advance of winning. Their 64% defeat is going to haunt them and leftist extremists the world over a long, long time—as well it should!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top