lizziedog1
Member
I was looking through some of my reloading manuals. I was looking at all the cartridges that we have. I noticed that certain calibers have more cartridges available than others.
30 caliber cartridges seem to come in all flavors and sizes. How many 308 Winchester class, 30 caliber cartridges do we really need? How many 30 caliber, full-blown magnums, are really necessary? How long before the next new-fangled one shows up on a cover of a gun magazine?
Then I looked at 270 cartridges. There are exactly three. The Winchester, the Winchester Short Magnum, and the Weatherby Magnum. Why have only three cartridges in this caliber and ten times the number in 30 caliber?
Actually, 270 caliber development makes more sense. You have the 270 Winchester that should do for most hunting situation around here. If one wants to hot rod this, they can get the Weatherby offering. Then you have the short magnum that sort of splits the difference.
7mm rounds seem to be varied also. Not as much as 30 caliber, but definately more than 270 caliber. Way more than 6.5mm caliber, a caliber that I feel should have a few more options available. 22 caliber seems to be pretty popular, not so much for 35 caliber. Whats up with that?
So, what is our infactuation with certain calibers? If a hunter is a 30 caliber fan and wants to have a gun chambered for every 30 caliber cartridge, he could just about hunt everyday with a different gun. And when he gets bored with all those 30 calibers, all he has to do is wait a few months for the next new, grand super-duper 30 caliber to be introduced. Three guns would cover all the 270 calibers for 270 fans. At least it won't goof up his budget as much.
Why hasn't cartridge development been so intensive in certain calibers?
30 caliber cartridges seem to come in all flavors and sizes. How many 308 Winchester class, 30 caliber cartridges do we really need? How many 30 caliber, full-blown magnums, are really necessary? How long before the next new-fangled one shows up on a cover of a gun magazine?
Then I looked at 270 cartridges. There are exactly three. The Winchester, the Winchester Short Magnum, and the Weatherby Magnum. Why have only three cartridges in this caliber and ten times the number in 30 caliber?
Actually, 270 caliber development makes more sense. You have the 270 Winchester that should do for most hunting situation around here. If one wants to hot rod this, they can get the Weatherby offering. Then you have the short magnum that sort of splits the difference.
7mm rounds seem to be varied also. Not as much as 30 caliber, but definately more than 270 caliber. Way more than 6.5mm caliber, a caliber that I feel should have a few more options available. 22 caliber seems to be pretty popular, not so much for 35 caliber. Whats up with that?
So, what is our infactuation with certain calibers? If a hunter is a 30 caliber fan and wants to have a gun chambered for every 30 caliber cartridge, he could just about hunt everyday with a different gun. And when he gets bored with all those 30 calibers, all he has to do is wait a few months for the next new, grand super-duper 30 caliber to be introduced. Three guns would cover all the 270 calibers for 270 fans. At least it won't goof up his budget as much.
Why hasn't cartridge development been so intensive in certain calibers?