CCW/OC Practicality of 3" vs 1.87" LCR?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Feb 14, 2011
Messages
234
Location
Colorado, USA
Since I obtained my CHP I've carried my Glock 26 IWB whenever possible and I've found it to be very comfortable; I don't specifically plan on replacing the G26 for everyday IWB carry. The other day, however, I went hiking and I OC'd my Glock in a Bianchi UM92 holster on my backpack's waste straps (in 1 o'clock position). Although comfortable at first, my heavy austrian brick quickly found its way to my backpack where it remained for the rest of the [strenuous all-day] hike.

Long story short, I need an LCR for alternate forms of carry when my G26 can't be carried IWB (especially while hiking). That includes 1 o'clock OC, OWB hip (if possible with whatever pack I'm using), and probably pocket carry as well.

In your opinion, are there any issues with going with the 3" .38 spl LCR over the 1.87" (considering things like overall carry comfort, mobility, and overall practicality)? Which would you choose given my situation?

Thanks!
 
A Glock 26 is heavy?

I don't think the 3-inch LCR will fit in your pocket. Otherwise, it's a fine little gun.
 
For the most part, thickness and grip size are your main concerns with concealment. IWB, a longer barrel disappears pretty easily.
 
If you are going to keep the glock for everyday carry, I would go with the longer barrel LCR. The longer the round stays in the barrel the better it will perform ballistically. The longer sight radius will make it slightly more accurate. If you are trading in the glock for a LCR the shorter barrel will allow for easier concealment. Personally I would keep the glock for day to day carry and get the 3 inch LCR for out in the woods. Load the LCR with some 158 grain semiwadcutters and it will stop almost anything that may come at you. A website called ballistics by the inch may help in your decision.
 
I have the 357 1.8 LCR and it's great. I saw the it came out in a 3 in but I believe it's in
38 spl, so far. I would prefer the 3 in gun over the 1.8 for sight radius and ballistics.
 
Since I obtained my CHP I've carried my Glock 26 IWB whenever possible and I've found it to be very comfortable; I don't specifically plan on replacing the G26 for everyday IWB carry. The other day, however, I went hiking and I OC'd my Glock in a Bianchi UM92 holster on my backpack's waste straps (in 1 o'clock position). Although comfortable at first, my heavy austrian brick quickly found its way to my backpack where it remained for the rest of the [strenuous all-day] hike.

Long story short, I need an LCR for alternate forms of carry when my G26 can't be carried IWB (especially while hiking). That includes 1 o'clock OC, OWB hip (if possible with whatever pack I'm using), and probably pocket carry as well.

In your opinion, are there any issues with going with the 3" .38 spl LCR over the 1.87" (considering things like overall carry comfort, mobility, and overall practicality)? Which would you choose given my situation?

Thanks!

I own and carry both the G26 and a Ruger 3" LCRx and here is my take...

First off, the G26 is an excellent self defense handgun and is a great companion for hiking. Small, light, accurate, and with 10+1 of standard or +P ammo it is a great carry gun with a lot of firepower in a small package. Although it is light, it will carry much better on your body than on the waist straps of your pack.

For open carry of the G26, I would suggest a pancake style belt holster. Having the gun on your person will make it feel lighter and less of a brick. To try an inexpensive option of the pancake design get a GLOCK Sport and Combat holster. This GLOCK holster is inexpensive, yet does the job well. Below is a link to one at MidwayUSA:

GLOCK Sport and Combat Holster at MidwayUSA

Next up, the Ruger 3" LCRx... As they say ounces turn into pounds when in the woods. Your post mentioned this gun would be used OWB for hiking. The 3" LCR is light enough to almost disappear when on your hip and in my opinion would be a great option for you.

I bought mine for in the woods carry and it fills that bill quite well. It weighs around 1 pound and the longer 3" barrel appears more accurate than the snubbie versions because of the extra sight radius. You also get an a little more velocity with the longer barrel, however the 3" barrel doesn't allow for pocket carry. I generally limit my 3" Ruger to in the woods carry because the longer barrel makes it harder to conceal when compared to my other carry options. The snubbie version could give you more options for concealed carry if that is something you are looking for.

I carry my 3" LCRx OWB in a leather pancake style Mitch Rosen holster which I purchased from Ruger's on-line store. My revolver came with a $25 discount coupon from Ruger which made this holster a great buy.

The 3" LCRx is a great lightweight trail gun, but here are some other considerations... 1) It only has a 5 round capacity. Not a show stopper for me, but some want more rounds on tap. 2) It is only chambered in 38 Special +P. This is a good defensive caliber for 2-legged threats and is a very effective caliber for taking small game. However, if bears are the reason you are carrying a sidearm I would look to a more effective caliber. I no longer live in a location with a big bear threat so a lightweight revolver in +P 38 Special is just fine. 3) Grip angle. The LCR's grip angle is much more vertical than that of your G26. This isn't good or bad, but the LCR will point much lower if you use your standard GLOCK hold. 4) Lastly, a light weight revolver can be a challenge to shoot accurately. The trigger pulls are heavy and lighter guns tend to move around more during the trigger stroke and may require some practice to master.

In summary... The G26 and 3" LCRx both get a thumbs up from me for in the woods carry. Regardless of the choice, for hiking I suggest OWB carry in a pancake style holster.

Let us know what you pick!

Edmo

imagejpg1_zpsa76fa173.jpg
 
Last edited:
I wonder why they set the 3 in up that way? I'd prefer the 357 in a 3 in...and a large part of the LCR's appeal for me is the hammer less fire control system.
 
I only have experience with the .38 +P LCR with the original 1.8" barrel, but I really do like the gun and can hit center mass out to 7 yards with enough consistency to confidently carry the gun.

Do you hike with gloves? That alone may warrant the larger grip of the bigger LCR.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
The 3" bbl is only available in the LCRx with exposed hammer and single action capability. If the bbl doesn't limit pocket carry, the exposed hammer doesn't help there. The short and long grips are interchangeable. If taking small game, the 3", fired single action, is a better choice, especially over the hidden hammer, DAO 1.87" bbl LCR model.

And I LIKE the flutes on the cylinders! But to each his own...

Andy
 
If you are going to pocket carry, stick with the 1.8” barrel, otherwise I would definitely go with the 3” barrel. The 3” is a little to long for pocket carry unless you’re wearing cargo pants with big pockets. Then probably okay.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top