Enfield Newbie, and I sure could use some help...

Status
Not open for further replies.

Doug S

Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2003
Messages
1,260
Hi All,

I’m new to Enfield firearms. Today I picked up a, what I think is a 1943 Shirley from what I’ve been reading on the Net. That said, I no virtually nothing about these rifles and I was hoping some of you could shed some light on my confusion.

For one, this is a Century import and although it is in nice shape appearance wise, the serial numbers appear to have been scrubbed. Here is an overview of the markings I can find. On the rear band I can clearly see a “M47”, but it is not followed by a “C” as I’ve read should be there. Below the M47 is clearly the year 1943. Below that, if I look closely with a flashlight I can see the vague remnant of the serial number. I see what I think are a couple of letters, possible an “A” and an “E” (but I’m not sure), followed by a 27, followed by possibly an 80.

On the rear of the bolt I can see the slight imprint of what looks to be a unidentifiable letter followed by what appears to be a “B” followed by 27567.

Underneath the wood in front of the receiver, I can clearly see a “B”, and what looks like half of a “4”, followed by a clear “3”.

The front metal in front of the wood has an “AB”, the front band a “CEW”, and the top of the front sight has a small “SM” and either three other letters opposite, or three numbers that I can quite make out.

On the safety/takedown lever I see a “B” and an arrow. I see the arrow on some other parts also including the rear of the trigger guard (possibly with a crown, but only the very top of what appears to be the crown is there, just below the arrow. Could be something else).

The wood has a variety of markings including an “MM” on the front wood, and on the bottom portion of the buttstock, just behind the trigger guard a “SL”, then a six pointed star over a “V”, over what appears to be a small crown with a “W-M and the number 70 below it.

On the buttplate there is a “M/216”. Interesting the buttplate screws have dirt in the screw slots.

I sure would greatly appreciate it if someone could shed some light on the markings and especially why the serial numbers were scrubbed, and why the M47 isn’t followed by a “C”. I was looking for a gun of English manufacture to add to my Man Cave WWII collection, and I’m really just hoping that this is a genuine English manufactured gun, and not some other manufacturer.

Thanks very much for any help. I’ll try to get pictures up sometime soon.

Forgot to mention, price tag was $239.
 
Last edited:
You have a typical BSA #4mk1. The M47 is the ID. The serial number was probably not scrubbed, only made dim by some sort of arsenal refinish (FTR). The various numbers and letters you are describibg are the vendors markings, since the sub contractors were dispersed around the Shirley factory due to being bomber by the Germans. Pics are real helpful here too. The rifles from Century that came from Turkey (probably yours) were refinished somewhere in that area, and heavy parkerizing will make the stampings hard to read.

Is there a wood screw in the fore arm in front of the mag well? Also, know that the bolt and rifle don't have to match, but matching is more desirable for collecting purposes.

You will love the Enfield.
 
Any markings on the metal near the wrist of the stock? Look at the area covered by the ball of the bolt handle, when the bolt is closed.
 
ACtually thats the next milsurp i would like to have. A British No 4 Mk 1 , excelllent bore and has a micrometer sight Mk 1. Of course one with decent pricetag , too. So far i havent really come across . Also Im just leery of headspace issues on these rifles (or its just overblown from what Ive read).
Weeks ago i was at the gunshow and saw a nice Long Branch . On inspection i depressed the mag follower and it wouild also push down the whole mag . Somewhat loose, alright . So I reinserted the magazine and did the same thing and mag will move down when follower is depressed.

THe only Enfield type rifle i have is a Ishapore 2A1 which looks so classy WW 1. I would love to have a 303 Brit No 1 mk 3 or a No 4 Mk 1 someday if it comes along my way.
 
Thanks everyone for the responses. In answer to a couple of questions...

1. No, I do not see a wood screw anywhere in the stock.

2. The only other marking that I see around the bolt handle is on the flat area on top of the receiver just below the bolt handle. It has a small crown with a number that I can't read below the crown.

Is there something specific that should be in the area below the bolt handle?

Thanks again for the feedback.
 
I forgot to mention, but from looking at the website link, my stock appears to be Beech.
 
Last edited:
pix320172328.gif
MY1940 DATED BRITISH BSA SHTLE III RIFLE. ALL matching. The sling on it looks like an old horse reighs that is stiched on. I am trying to find out what common wealth country they came from using the sling. Maybe Malaysia, india or turkey Notice the mag cut off and old style cocker. No *
pix320172015.gif
pix320171890.gif
pix320172156.gif
 
Last edited:
"...headspace issues on these rifles..." Depends on if Century had anything to do with it. They assembled thousands of No. 1's and No. 4's out of parts bins with no QC of any kind.
You should check the headspace on any Lee-Enfield no matter where it came from though. Matching numbers is no guarantee either. Fortunately, if the headspace on a No. 4 is bad, fixing it isn't a big deal. The bolt heads are numbered. 0 to 3. You try the next up with proper headspace guages(a No-Go and a Field is sufficent). Mind you, if you have a #2 bolt head, finding a #3 won't be easy.
A No. 1 is a whole different thing. The bolt heads are not numbered so you have to have a handful of bolt heads to try with the guages until you find one that won't allow the bolt to completely close on a No-Go guage. However, if it does close, you try the Field. If it closes on a Field, try another bolt head.
Go here for excellent info and pictures of the assorted Lee-Enfields.
http://enfieldrifles.profusehost.net/main.htm
 
Ooooo, is this an Enfield show and tell? Here's my No.5 Mk1 Jungle Carbine after I refinished the wood with Fairtrimmers. I found this lil' honey in a pawn shop for $150. Had to take off Bubba's deer scope and put the correct rear sight on it, and buy a correct sling for it. Less than $50 for all that.

DSCN2930.gif
 
rondog:

Did you find that 'Babe' recently in a pawn shop? If so, a superb deal.
Lots of guys with good deals don't mention that they were ten or twenty years ago.

Some very experienced guys here at the upscale shooting club were surprised that my latest #5 was listed for just $350 at the September gun show.
Does the serious scarcity of surplus .303 ammo cause LEs to be generally less desirable?
 
Hi All,

I’m new to Enfield firearms. Today I picked up a, what I think is a 1943 Shirley from what I’ve been reading on the Net. That said, I no virtually nothing about these rifles and I was hoping some of you could shed some light on my confusion.

For one, this is a Century import and although it is in nice shape appearance wise, the serial numbers appear to have been scrubbed. Here is an overview of the markings I can find. On the rear band I can clearly see a “M47”, but it is not followed by a “C” as I’ve read should be there. Below the M47 is clearly the year 1943. Below that, if I look closely with a flashlight I can see the vague remnant of the serial number. I see what I think are a couple of letters, possible an “A” and an “E” (but I’m not sure), followed by a 27, followed by possibly an 80.

On the rear of the bolt I can see the slight imprint of what looks to be a unidentifiable letter followed by what appears to be a “B” followed by 27567.

Underneath the wood in front of the receiver, I can clearly see a “B”, and what looks like half of a “4”, followed by a clear “3”.

The front metal in front of the wood has an “AB”, the front band a “CEW”, and the top of the front sight has a small “SM” and either three other letters opposite, or three numbers that I can quite make out.

On the safety/takedown lever I see a “B” and an arrow. I see the arrow on some other parts also including the rear of the trigger guard (possibly with a crown, but only the very top of what appears to be the crown is there, just below the arrow. Could be something else).

The wood has a variety of markings including an “MM” on the front wood, and on the bottom portion of the buttstock, just behind the trigger guard a “SL”, then a six pointed star over a “V”, over what appears to be a small crown with a “W-M and the number 70 below it.

On the buttplate there is a “M/216”. Interesting the buttplate screws have dirt in the screw slots.

I sure would greatly appreciate it if someone could shed some light on the markings and especially why the serial numbers were scrubbed, and why the M47 isn’t followed by a “C”. I was looking for a gun of English manufacture to add to my Man Cave WWII collection, and I’m really just hoping that this is a genuine English manufactured gun, and not some other manufacturer.

Thanks very much for any help. I’ll try to get pictures up sometime soon.

Forgot to mention, price tag was $239.

BSA Shirley marks are B, M47C, M47, 85B, BS, and UB.

The AE is the serial number prefix, AE is a known prefix for the 1943 BSA.
The serial number on the bolt and receiver should match, after all these years much can be worn away or you could have a mismatched bolt. The mismatch is fine as long as you check the head space.

Check this site for more info.
http://enfieldresource.com/James_Sweet.php
http://www.surplusrifleforum.com/index.php

The “M/216” on the butt plate is the ID mark for Sanbra Ltd, Brimingham.

There is a lot of info on-line about the numerous Lee Enfield models and the hundreds of variations. Proceed with caution it can be additive.

collection01.jpg
collectiom02.jpg
 
Madcratebuilder,

Thanks very much for the detailed responses, and links. That is an awesome collection of Enfields you have there.

Can you tell me if the beech stock would be from the period of WWII, or is it most likely a post war replacement? The upper grooved handguard appears to be the same type of wood as the rest of the stock.
 
rogertc1, that is a typical English sling, common from prior to WWI up to the SLR (L1A1) in the 80's, before adoption of the L85.

That is a very nice rifle. The interesting things are 1) the interesting date stamp and 2) the magazine cut off. The date looks almost like a restamp, but it is almost certainly legit, making your rifle an early "dispersal rifle". Dispersal rifles were manufactured from spare parts at BSA Shirley after the start of WWII, after Dunkirk (sp). The Brits had adopted the #4mk1 by then, but they badly needed rifles to repel a possible German invasion.

The mag cut off was from the pre 1917 Sht LE MKIII (#1mkIII) and was dropped around 1917 or 1918. If you have a #4mk1, you will see that the reciever still has the casting for the cut off to be installed. The cut off was usually removed from a #imkIII during arsenal refinishing (FTR) as it was deemed unnecessary. My 1917 BSA MKIII has the cutoff reinstalled and properly marked as a #1mkIII=.

Not to 'jack the OP, but the various versions of the Enfield make them a very interesting rifle for research. I they could only talk.

000_0378.jpg
 
Doug the old reigns like leather sling is laced on with a twine...which is why I thought a common wealth. Nice collection.
Enfields are very addicting. I also have a savage lend/lease, jungle carbine and a indian 308 so far. I remember back in the 70's the only ones out there were painted and black crapy wood. Just these last 10 or so years are there really nice ones.
 
rondog:

Did you find that 'Babe' recently in a pawn shop? If so, a superb deal.
Lots of guys with good deals don't mention that they were ten or twenty years ago.

Yep, picked it up last summer in Grand Junction, CO. The receiver had been D&T'd for a scope mount, the rear sight was missing, and it had an old leather belt for a sling. The correct sight parts and sling were easy to find, I still have the scope and mount, it can go on and off very easily. And it's a genuine #5, not a modified #4. The s/n is on the receiver, barrel, bolt and stock, no import stamps anywhere. It's a sweetheart.
 
rogertc1, I know which sling you are describing (doh!). I got one on #4mk1 from Turkey, and it did look like someone raided the tac room. Laced on with strands of leather. Trashed it immediately and replaced it with a more proper Brit sling.
 
Madcratebuilder,

Thanks very much for the detailed responses, and links. That is an awesome collection of Enfields you have there.

Can you tell me if the beech stock would be from the period of WWII, or is it most likely a post war replacement? The upper grooved handguard appears to be the same type of wood as the rest of the stock.
Beech wood was used on most post war rifles, almost exclusive on the PF and UF Mk2 series from Faz. A few No5's have Beech.

A war time production rifle that has a beech stock would indicate a replacement to me. One thing about Enfields, never say never or always.

After the rifle leaves the factory and is in service, armors at the unit level could and would use what ever part they had on hand to keep a rifle in service.
 
Thanks again for the info. If the Beech stock is a post war replacement, I will probably tr to trade this at the next gun show. I want an old beat up veteran for my display.

Here are a couple of pictures.

Enfield0031.gif

Enfield0211.gif
 
In my pic, the third rifle from the left is a Savage with birch. Beech was used during the war also, but not nearly as common as birch and walnut. Your rifle is a dandy too!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top