Quantcast

FBI stats show 5 times more murders by knives than rifles in 2018

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by kcofohio, Oct 2, 2019.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Pudge

    Pudge Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    263
    Location:
    Tioga County, PA
    Is leaving a vehicle unlocked irresponsible in your society?
     
    theotherwaldo likes this.
  2. SharpDog

    SharpDog member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2006
    Messages:
    2,120
    Location:
    Tennessee
    Make sure to buy black knives with over 10" blades:

    Assault Knife:

    upload_2019-10-13_13-16-32.png

    https://smile.amazon.com/Gerber-Gat...=2025&creative=165953&creativeASIN=B004A1IXRC
     
    kcofohio likes this.
  3. Insignificant bill

    Insignificant bill Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2019
    Messages:
    85
    If there is a gun in it is.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 13, 2019
  4. bearcreek

    bearcreek Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2009
    Messages:
    1,633
    Location:
    NE Ohio
    That wasn't my question. I'll post it here again, with emphasis added, just so it's clear what I'm asking.
     
  5. benEzra

    benEzra Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    8,704
    Location:
    Down East in NC
    Allowing police to search homes without warrant or probable cause, to torture suspects, to imprison suspects for life without trial, to set up ID and X-ray checkpoints on city streets, etc. would probably reduce violent crime by “civilians” as well. But the result would be a state of affairs that would be *worse* than violent crime.

    I’m sure China has very little violent crime by civilians...but when you count violent crime by the government, they have almost certainly murdered more people since WW2 than the rest of the planet combined.

    The Bill of Rights is there for a reason. Yes, pragmatic arguments are very effective against the stupidest gun control proposals, like banning certain rifle handgrip shapes (“assault weapons”), trying to ban and confiscate magazines with less capacity than a 1777 Girandoni or an 1861 Henry, or limiting carry licensure to the rich and famous. But infringement on protected civil liberties that didn’t fail pragmatic tests would not automatically be ok, because civil liberties are foundational to a just society.

    BTW, conflating mass public killings with criminal violence is nonsensical; the per capita homicide rate from mass public killings is already almost zero, and many countries with very harsh laws (France and Norway come to mind) have had worse mass shootings and higher per-capita mass shooting deaths than the United States, even with our media constantly trying to shake loose more of them.
     
    Last edited: Oct 14, 2019
    bearcreek and kcofohio like this.
  6. Texas10mm

    Texas10mm Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2018
    Messages:
    2,145
    Location:
    Not DFW
    Exactly what do you think would be able to do that?
     
  7. bearcreek

    bearcreek Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2009
    Messages:
    1,633
    Location:
    NE Ohio
    Exactly. Well put. Just to clarify, my answer, to my own question,
    , is no, it would not change my mind. The 2A is in place to protect the right of the people to own and train with the tools needed to keep the government in perpetual fear of the people. It's primary purpose is not to prevent or lower violent civilian crime, even though that can be a nice side benefit. Too many "gun people" forget that I think. The number of civilians killed by civilians is a teeny tiny percentage of the number of civilians killed by governments, which is why it doesn't (or shouldn't) matter if civilian gun ownership rates raise or lower civilian violent crime rates.
     
    benEzra likes this.
  8. GEM

    GEM Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2004
    Messages:
    6,149
    Location:
    TX
    Anyone remember the Simpson's episodes with the Alien invasion and sticks? You can google it.

    However, we are wandered away from the OP about knives. We know that the UK knife bans are a prime example of how such would work with questionable efficacy.
     
  9. bearcreek

    bearcreek Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2009
    Messages:
    1,633
    Location:
    NE Ohio
    Tax incentives for people who attain certain levels of proficiency would be a good start.
     
  10. Pudge

    Pudge Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2012
    Messages:
    263
    Location:
    Tioga County, PA
    What about your house?
     
  11. Sistema1927

    Sistema1927 Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2004
    Messages:
    6,488
    Location:
    "Land of (dis)Enchantment"
    I support universal unicorn ownership.

    Both of our proposals have exactly the same chance of being successful.
     
    Texas10mm likes this.
  12. GEM

    GEM Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2004
    Messages:
    6,149
    Location:
    TX
    We are off knives, so I will cut this one off.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice