Glock 19 is best handgun ?

Glock, Colt, or Sig Sauer?

  • Glock

    Votes: 44 53.0%
  • Colt

    Votes: 5 6.0%
  • Sig Sauer

    Votes: 24 28.9%
  • All three

    Votes: 10 12.0%

  • Total voters
    83
Status
Not open for further replies.
All kidding aside from my above post.. i think that the CZ 75 B compact or the CZ PO1 may be the best one for me (when compared to the Glock 19 size class).

Much better ergonomics. Just as reliable. And I am starting to prefer hammer fired guns. (And this is from someone that has carried the 19 for over a decade.)

The Glock 19 was my favorite.. until I discovered the CZ PO1 and CZ compacts.
Colt DID make a CZ/ 1911 hybrid that was actually good material for a modern handgun.. but just as typical of Colt, they shot down their own good ideas. Only made 1000 of them with the Colt name.
CZ was all 'what the freak man' but decided to manufacture the gun themselves. I forgot what it was called. I figured this was the gun you were talking about in your post.
 
I can't complain about my 9mm Glocks. I never had the grip angle problem that is a common concern. I shoot a 1911 or Glock decently. If I were a wealthy person, I might experiment with other guns but since I'm not, I probably will settle on one of the Glocks for my EDC semi carry. Shot a Sig 320 and it was fine but no reason to switch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vba
Honestly I don’t find any Glock to be best or most optimal for any scenario at all. I shoot them fine, but I don’t like them at all, and I feel there are plenty of other good options out there that feel better in my hand.

The more I like a gun, the more I shoot a gun, and the greater proficiency I have.

I favor Sigs and HK’s and several others. Nothing wrong with people liking their Glocks, but I don’t really think “best” can be used to describe any gun. Its all specific to the end user.

I did not vote in the poll, because I’m unclear on its meaning.
 
The size of the 19 is about perfect, there's just so much about it that doesn't work for me. Between the grip angle and the trigger guard window my trigger finger drags hard on the bottom of the guard. I also think stamped metal mags would help athe thick plastic G mags require a larger grip girth than necessary.
I also prefer some type of safety on a gun in a hip holster where reholstering and having a foreign object (jacket, shirt or something) could cause an AD/ND.
I like the XDm 3.8. FN FNS or 509 and even Ruger SR series better.
 
The size of the 19 is about perfect, there's just so much about it that doesn't work for me. Between the grip angle and the trigger guard window my trigger finger drags hard on the bottom of the guard. I also think stamped metal mags would help athe thick plastic G mags require a larger grip girth than necessary.
I also prefer some type of safety on a gun in a hip holster where reholstering and having a foreign object (jacket, shirt or something) could cause an AD/ND.
I like the XDm 3.8. FN FNS or 509 and even Ruger SR series better.

I agree, I was going to post about the SR9C earlier.
 
Last edited:
If someone handed me a gun in a bad situation and that gun was a G19, I would feel grateful. It's a solid pistol. Easy to shoot. Accurate enough.

That said, if I were starving on a desert island and someone handed me a bologna sandwich, I'd feel grateful for that too.

The G19 is OK. I had one. I don't anymore. I would say it would make a good stash away gun. Like if you were putting together a bug out kit that would only be touched in an emergency and could sit for years at a time, the 19 would make a good choice.

I personally find both the SIG 320 and FN 509 Midsize better shooters in my hands.
 
There is something about the size of the Glock 19 which is just 'perfect' for a mid caliber (.32-40) handgun. With better sights, sans finger grooves, and with better trigger, it actually is a very ideal handgun.

The way i see it you have two options,

1: get a CZ P10C and buy night sights
2: get a gen 5 glock with the factory ameriglos and buy an aftermarket trigger
 
Holstering ANY gun, requires care and attention. Relying on another manual safety or two to do so, isnt a guarentee you wont have problems, especially if youre relying on things you may not always remember to set, especailly under stress.

Paying attention to what youre doing when you holster, regardless what the gun is, will always be safer than relying on something extra, that adds complexity and requires more from you to make the gun safe.

Proper and ingrained handling skills, are more important than adding safties. And even more so, when stress is involved.

Another thing I find intersting too is, when you draw something like a 1911, or any gun with a manual safety, the safety comes off as the gun clears the holster, so from that point on, what type of gun is in your hand, is pretty much a moot point.

DA guns, once fired, are in the same category. DAO guns are a little different, and probably the safest, especially in the hands of the unfamiliar, but they still need your full attention.

Im sure, if youve been around long enough, youve seen people do stupid and/or unfortunate things with all sorts of different guns. Ive seen people have AD's with 1911's that were supposed to be safe, Ive seen SIG's that were fired and reholstered without decocking, guns with safeties that were non functional from the factory, etc. Relying on things you have to set, or things you dont constantly vett, is just asking for trouble, and only a matter of time before somethng goes wrong. Constant proper training and practice will do more for you, than adding another safety.

But isnt it funny, how its always the guns fault, when something goes wrong? Its never going to be the users fault, because..... well, you know. :thumbup:
 
None of the choices are correct the correct choice would be a 4-5 inch barrel revolver in caliber .357 magnum - .45 Colt. If we are strictly talking about the autos (which I totally believe is a fad, they'll be back to the wheel side soon :D) I believe the M and P 2.0 compact to be superior to the three choices for a variety of reasons, that being said however the best of the 3 choices is thd Glock. SIG has had too many QC issues with the 320 and 365 that takes away my interest in them. The Colt (assuming we are talking 1911 here) is best served in the hands that know how to control it and are proficient in the artistry that comes with mastering it (many of our members here have immeasurable experience with the 1911 platform) but the Glock 19 is a solidly built gun that would do well for the beginner or "expert", although any gun can have issues I've had far fewer issues with Glock vs the other two ( the Colt 1911 pains me to say that.).
 
Glocks are good, but IMHO the only thing they offer above about 2 dozen other similar clones is better aftermarket support.

I have a Glock 17 Gen 4 (used to own a 17 Gen 2) and it works fine, but I'm not a loyalist. For me, the M&P is more ergonomic/stylish, Ruger is more bang for the buck, and Taurus gets the job done if you're looking for the rock bottom price.

SIG to me is good too but cost-wise its a bit closer to Glock so it's just a matter of personal preference. Your third option - Colt - is a completely different animal. A 1911 can be 100% reliable, and when they are they're a more fun accurate and fun gun to shoot, however unless you plan on shooting a LOT of ammo, really making sure the gun works, and possibly tweaking it a bit, then I wouldn't just grab one out of the box. My only old-school .45ACP 1911 (an STI Spartan - made by RIA) needed a new extractor before it would function reliably.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vba
G19, the best? It’s my chosen carry gun, but I wouldn’t say “best” without a qualifier. For me, it’s the best $500 gun out there with the ease and availability of upgrades. Same as the 10/22 is the best or the AR is the best.

The actual best? Custom Hi-Power or 1911, or Sig P210, probably.
 
As striker-fired pistols go, the Glock 19 certainly has an attractive size and weight for its magazine capacity, great aftermarket support, and a reputation for reliability.

But while the ergonomics work very well for some (so they say), for me they suck. I can shoot the SIG P320 more comfortably and accurately and it offers the same capacity in a package that is only a little less sleek and a little heavier.

But I can shoot the G 19 with pretty tolerable "combat accuracy" so I do own one, along with a couple of SIG P320s.
 
Some guns just fit so well that their size and weight sets the standard for their entire market. The 4" K frame heavy barrel did that for service revolvers, the 22" Model 70 featherweight for hunting rifles, and the Glock 19 sets that size for striker pistols.
 
I am now carrying a customized G-19 .
But after handling the new G-48,guess that will be my next pistol purchase and then might replace the G-19 as my EDC.
Handle one,then see what I mean.
 
I'm sure the Glock 19 is a great gun but if I'm going to the range I might as well take the larger model 17 and if I'm going to carry something I'd choose something smaller.

At the point where you have to change the trigger, change the sights and alter the grip it seems hard to argue that it's the best gun out there for you.
 
I owned a Gen 3 G19. The finger grooves drive me nuts. I have big hands. I ditched the G19. I prefer the Glock 17 grip size. I have a G19X and a G45 (9mm) and I like them both. I have not shot a newer G19 without the finger grooves but I now live in California so I probably won’t be able to buy a Gen 5 G19 anytime soon...unless I want to pay a very stupid price for one.
 
19 is my least favorite glock in the safe.

Would be a tie between my 29 and 23 (19 size but in 40. I dont have a 19) personally.

The 17 would be my choice. Followed by the 26.

I'm firmly in this camp. Always have been. The 19 to me is the worst of both worlds. Too big to conceal and if I can carry one that big I'll take the extra barrel/sight radius and capacity for the exact same price. I'd take a 27/26 if I want to conceal. I'll take a 22/17 for duty. I do have a couple 320s but if I want a colt/sig/HK or FN I'll take a hammer fired gun.

As far as best gun, ones opinion would change drastically if called upon to stop a pissed off polar bear, shoot a tiny group at 100 yards, or to carry concealed in 95 degree weather. I would choose a different "best" from my collection for each purpose. Likely different "bests" on different days as my mood changes. But the compact Glock would never be that gun for me.
 
A Glock 19 is the best all around 9mm IMO. Not too big to conceal, not that small that it's difficult to shoot. Reliable, reasonably accurate, rugged and user friendly.

There are other 9mms out that that are better for some applications but the G19 is the best all around.

I share this as a personal opinion. I have a fair amount of pistols I really love but if I could keep only one if would be my Gen 2 Glock 19 that is still box stock other than the Grip Force adapter I put on it to give me to extra trigger reach. I bought it in the early 90s and it has never ever given me an issue and for me is a joy to shoot and CCW.

WYFmvJT.jpg
 
I like the 2.0 Compact in that size range better. It's slightly heavier but has far better ergonomics and the trigger feels better to me. Either one is a bit bulky and heavy for a gun I'd want as an EDC. I do carry mine some but mostly use it as more of a truck/camper gun, and my primary carry rotation is a 9mm Shield and LCP.

If I could only have one handgun and I could choose from anything currently available, I think I'd probably take a Performance Center 2.0 Shield 4" or a Glock 48. Either would offer the longer barrel and sight radius coupled with the thinness for comfortable IWB carry.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vba
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top