Halloran Opposes Proposed Rule Amendment Regarding Gun Licenses

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Dec 19, 2006
Messages
591
Location
New York NY
Halloran Opposes Proposed Rule Amendment Regarding Gun Licenses

Council Member Dan Halloran (R-Whitestone) will speak out at a public hearing today opposing a proposed rule amendment to the City's gun licensure regulations. The proposed regulations would allow revoking or denying a firearm license to applicants for a vague and bizarre array of reasons of dubious relevance.

"This rule amendment would allow the City to deny a gun license to almost any law-abiding New Yorker, and for downright silly reasons, " Halloran said. "We are stepping on a very slippery slope here. Many of these requirements are painfully vague. That can include 'violations' that have nothing to do with one's fitness to own a gun, such as building code and sanitation violations. And others have nothing at all (to) do with gun safety or crime in any way. Now, you can be denied a gun permit for poor driving, termination from a job, or failing to pay your Cable bill.

"This amendment is just another way for the City to infringe on the Constitutional right of New Yorkers to bear arms. The City will stoop to almost any level to take this basic liberty away even if it means bending the Constitution and defying all common sense. I'm here to oppose this law. And it will not make our city safer. It will only deny freedom to law-abiding New Yorkers, without doing a thing to punish or take guns away from criminals who acquire guns illegally or on the black market."

Here is a scanned copy of his press release:

http://www.nysrpa.org/files/DanHalloran-Press092210.pdf

Here is a link to his homepage with contact information:

http://council.nyc.gov/d19/html/members/home.shtml
 
I'm surprised to see this sort of nonsense taking place now.

With the recent cases in DC and here in Chicago, you'd think NY (and every other urban area where politicians use anti-gun stances to *appear* to be fighting crime) would be tip-toeing a little more carefully around this issue.
 
mstrat, that would require basic common sense and logical reasoning within a political structure. How often have you ever seen that?
 
Not to mention the tax payers dollars spent to defend such a stupid proposal when the NRA files suit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top