huntershooter
Member
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2005
- Messages
- 1,058
Using AA9, CCI 300 primers, 255 gr. (Lyman mold-commercially cast) KTSWC (GC), Starline brass.
Powder charge is 19.5 gr., +P laod in Ruger Bisley. Each charge individually weighed.
Took chrono to range for load development, accuracy phase.
Out of 12 rds. fired I had 3 hang fires; pop (primer), BANG.
In 35 yrs. of reloading I have never experienced this.
Have used AA9 in .357, .41 and .44 mags-usually one of the "accuracy" loads for moderate to low end "top" velocities in caliber.
Powder is NEW 8# can. Standard LP primers per Accurate Arms data.
The only answer I'm coming up with as to cause of inconsistent igniton (velocities) and hang fire is not enough roll crimp.
With crimp die (dedicated crimp die-I don't seat and crimp in one station) "maxed out", the visual crimp seems lacking. This with both Dillon and RCBS roll crimp dies. Further "tightening" of crimp die results in swaged in case mouth that is parallel to case body-no additional roll crimp.
Anyone with experience in this issue?
Thanks.
T
Powder charge is 19.5 gr., +P laod in Ruger Bisley. Each charge individually weighed.
Took chrono to range for load development, accuracy phase.
Out of 12 rds. fired I had 3 hang fires; pop (primer), BANG.
In 35 yrs. of reloading I have never experienced this.
Have used AA9 in .357, .41 and .44 mags-usually one of the "accuracy" loads for moderate to low end "top" velocities in caliber.
Powder is NEW 8# can. Standard LP primers per Accurate Arms data.
The only answer I'm coming up with as to cause of inconsistent igniton (velocities) and hang fire is not enough roll crimp.
With crimp die (dedicated crimp die-I don't seat and crimp in one station) "maxed out", the visual crimp seems lacking. This with both Dillon and RCBS roll crimp dies. Further "tightening" of crimp die results in swaged in case mouth that is parallel to case body-no additional roll crimp.
Anyone with experience in this issue?
Thanks.
T