If you're not a member of the NRA, it's TIME to join. $10.00/year

Status
Not open for further replies.
(The NRA backed a candidate who now turns out not to be so pro-gun after all.)

And you would rather have had Hillary or Bernie at the helm now? I've already made the point that a pro-gun liberal/progressive/socialist is as common as a horse with a horn stuck in its head. Name me a couple of nationally known, pro-gun progressives/socialists-and by "pro-gun" I don't mean politicians who merely claim they are "pro-Second Amendment" (they pretty much all do-though former Supreme Court Justice Stevens has foolishly left the lying cat out of the bag for even the blind to see); I mean politicians who are not proposing any additional gun legislation; who are for "shall issue" carry concealed licenses, who are fine with keeping so-called "assault" weapons legal and who have no problem with eighteen year olds buying a rifle.
I'm only asking for a couple of names...
 
Last edited:
I don't doubt for a minute that LaPierre and Cox are effective lobbyists. They're also horrid figureheads/spokesmen. Both make my skin crawl. The NRA really does need a new face, a new president that's not simply a figurehead. Let LaPierre and Cox oversee the lobbying, but get a new face at the top of the organization.

Vilifying "liberals" and turning the NRA's annual meeting into a GOP love fest also needs to cease.

Closing the door to gun owners is something we try to warn others against. The fact that THR doesn't tolerate non firearms politics is partly to make a place that all firearms interested people can come and discuss firearms without the vicious partisan behavior seen elsewhere.
 
...I mean politicians who are not proposing any additional gun legislation; who are for "shall issue" carry concealed licenses, who are fine with keeping so-called "assault" weapons legal and who have no problem with eighteen year olds buying a rifle.
I'm only asking for a couple of names...
Well not a Leftist by any means but also not endorsed by the OH GOP...

Current Ohio Lt Governor and Governor candidate Mary Taylor:thumbup:, who said all that (except she is for / will support Constitutional Carry) at a Pro 2A rally at Columbus 2 weeks ago, while slinging an ''assault shotgun'' style 12ga.....
 
And you would rather have had Hillary or Bernie at the helm now?
Ironically, had a Democrat been elected president, we would have had fewer antigun actions than we have had with Trump as president. That's because the Republicans (who control Congress) would have acted as a solid bloc against the proposals. Now, with Trump as president, they can't buck the leader of their party, or, in the case of some of them, they have "permission" to let their inner "gun controller" come to the surface. In other words there's no penalty for coming out as an antigun Republican. The NRA is also getting shredded by some of Trump's remarks.

Take bump stocks, for example. If Hillary had proposed a ban on bump stocks, she would have been met with a wall of opposition, and the ban would have gone nowhere.

BTW, I did not vote for Hillary. I left the line for president blank on the ballot. The only thing I voted for was a local bond issue.
 
I WAS an NRA member many years ago. I was getting 5 e mails each day and 3 to 4 snail mails each week. I asked them to stop and they would not.
I am no longer a member.
I do support their efforts, and I am a gun owner and have a carry permit but they send too much stuff so I quit.

This should help to solve your problem with NRA sending you to much snail mail;

"I think we can help the cause by going to the NRA main site, member services:
https://www.nramemberservices.org/members/faq/faq.aspx

And click the link to reduce the amount of physical mail you receive:
[email protected]

Ask them to stop the physical mail, which saves postage costs which should help the cause, and continue with receiving Email which costs close to zero. I've been making my contributions on-line for quite a while now and shouldn't have been this slow to take this action!"

Thank you wally for the information.

https://www.thehighroad.org/index.php?threads/suggestion-for-nra-members.834784/#post-10802045
 
As far as the NRA being an arm of the Republicans, Mr LaPierre and the NRA are simply recognizing and responding to the the realities of the current situation and the fact that the threat to our gun rights almost always comes from the Left, regardless of what label you want to apply to the Left. The NRA does endorse the the few pro-gun Democrats that come along but they are getting more and more scarce. As a gun rights organization how can the NRA not side more strongly with the Republicans? How can it be any other way? The NRA supports more Republicans because more Republicans are pro-gun.

Keep in mind that virtually every piece of major gun control law we have came into being while under Democratic leadership: The NFA ,1934 (Dems and FDR, who by the way also wanted registration and taxation of all guns included the bill but didn't get it), The FFA in 1938(est. requirement for dealers FFL) (FDR and Dems), GCA (interstate transfer) and Omnibus crime and "Safe Streets" in 1968 (raised handgun age to 21) Johnson and the Dems, Brady Bill in 1993 and Federal Assault Weapons ban in 1994. Both under Clinton and Dems.

I have an old, dog-eared photo of me, taken in 1964 when I was stationed at a U.S. Air Force SAC base in northern Michigan; showing me cradling a Browning Double Auto shotgun while proudly holding a ruffed grouse (called "pats" in Michigan-speak) for view. I was standing next to my aging '56 Ford coupe and, if you look closely, you can see a decal on the rear bumper that reads: "Support Your Right to Keep and Bear Arms". While still a young man, I naively believed then that all we had to do to preserve our Second Amendment right was to vote the anti-gun Democrats out and replace them with pro-gun Republicans and all would be well ever after. Over a half century later, the only thing that has changed is the anti-gun Howard Metzenbaum, Thomas Dodd and Ted Kennedy Democrat politicians of the day have been replaced with the likes of anti-gun Nancy Pelosi, Barbara Boxer and Chuck Schumer Democrat politicians. We ignore the donkey in the room at our peril.

The op started this thread with the thought that some people might want to take advantage of becoming a member of the National Rifle Association for ten bucks; a simple proposition that was met with a storm of anti-NRA invectives, arguing that the organization isn't "inclusive" enough; that the leader is just a "cynical manipulator" and that those who do decide to join should "hold their nose" in the process. The reality is that you will never persuade committed leftists to be sympathetic to the cause of a free people owning guns. The very idea threatens their ultimate goal of eventually controlling a society that so foolishly invites people who embrace the notion of disarming the populace into the big tent of democracy in the guise of "inclusion".

Socialist politicians riding the tide of emotion are always eager to use tragedy to drown out the voice of reason and to demonize the National Rifle Association. More gun legislation is just a cheap political ruse; a make-believe bandage to stick on a culture riddled with an amoral cancer. Hundreds of thousands of so-called progressives boarded chartered busses, chanting "99 bottles of beer on the wall" on their way to the rally in Washington DC to shake their little fists at the Second Amendment and rail mindlessly against the NRA. Right wing "exclusionists" were strangely excluded from the event. None of us could be found on any of those Greyhounds.

The NRA is composed of "millions of Americans representing a diverse contrast of age, sex, race and religion,...from every economic background, from every political affiliation. What you share with every other member is an appreciation of the shooting sports, a belief in our constitutional right to keep and bear arms and, most of all, a love of country." On the other hand, the NRA is not an organization that accomodates political mindsets that are for more gun control, the very agenda that most progressives are in locked-step with.

From these cold, dead hands...
 
Last edited:
United We Stand, Divided We Fall. The NRA is far from perfect, but it is the anti 2A org of interest. $10 bucks, that's it. Sign up or continue to watch your 2A rights incrementally disappear. I believe there are only 3 million members, just imagine what 10 million members would look like.
 
The reality is that you will never persuade committed leftists to be sympathetic to the cause of a free people owning guns.
Quite a few people on the left are alarmed at the Trump administration (and other social developments) and as a result are rethinking the need to own guns. Actually, the really hard left has never been opposed to guns, because they fit in with its "revolutionary" mindset. (I give you examples like the Black Panthers in the 1960's.)

The real impetus for gun control is coming from people more or less in the political middle, such as suburban soccer moms. People who might not be involved in politics at all, were it not for this issue. If you asked them if the state should own the means of production (a main tenet of socialism), they'd look at you with a blank stare (or they would laugh at you). Michael Bloomberg, the main money man behind the antigun movement, is a billionaire plutocrat, and certainly no leftist.

Democratic politicians such as Pelosi, Schumer, et. al., are pushing gun control because they think it garners them votes. And in their jurisdictions, it does. On the other hand, Heidi Heitkamp is not for gun control, because she knows how North Dakotans feel about it.
 
There is too much vitriol in this thread about folks who have political views outside of the realm of being pro or anti gun. Calling folks 'enemies' because their other political views may not be yours is not acceptable here.

If you want to contribute, please go ahead. If you don't and think the NRA leadership has problems that is your view to hold.

However, the nastiness is making me close this. The points were made and bickering is not productive.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top