Interesting article: We’re Not Losing the Culture Wars Anymore

Status
Not open for further replies.

RocketMan

Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2003
Messages
427
Location
Hickory, NC
A very interesting article in "City Journal, Autumn 2003 issue. The premise is that we are no longer losing the culture wars. A rather uplifting view of things.
Much too long to print in its entirety here, I have only included an excerpt.
Here's the link to the entire column: We’re Not Losing the Culture Wars Anymore City Journal - Autum 2003

The rise of Fox News is covered, as well as other conservative leaning outlets, book publishers, blogs, cartoons, and some celebrities.
However, gun rights take a hit in the description of the cartoon "South Park."


We’re Not Losing the Culture Wars Anymore
Brian C. Anderson
City Journal - Autumn 2003


The Left’s near monopoly over the institutions of opinion and information—which long allowed liberal opinion makers to sweep aside ideas and beliefs they disagreed with, as if they were beneath argument—is skidding to a startlingly swift halt. The transformation has gone far beyond the rise of conservative talk radio, that, ever since Rush Limbaugh’s debut 15 years ago, has chipped away at the power of the New York Times, the networks, and the rest of the elite media to set the terms of the nation’s political and cultural debate. Almost overnight, three huge changes in communications have injected conservative ideas right into the heart of that debate. Though commentators have noted each of these changes separately, they haven’t sufficiently grasped how, taken together, they add up to a revolution: no longer can the Left keep conservative views out of the mainstream or dismiss them with bromide instead of argument. Everything has changed.

The first and most visible of these three seismic events: the advent of cable TV, especially Rupert Murdoch’s Fox News Channel. Since its 1996 launch, Fox News has provided what its visionary CEO Roger Ailes calls a “haven†for viewers fed up with the liberal bias of the news media—potentially a massive audience, since the mainstream media stand well to the American people’s left.

Watch Fox for just a few hours and you encounter a conservative presence unlike anything on TV. Where CBS and CNN would lead a news item about an impending execution with a candlelight vigil of death-penalty protesters, for instance, at Fox “it is de rigueur that we put in the lead why that person is being executed,†senior vice president for news John Moody noted a while back. Fox viewers will see Republican politicians and conservative pundits sought out for meaningful quotations, skepticism voiced about environmentalist doomsaying, religion treated with respect, pro-life views given airtime—and much else they’d never find on other networks.

Fox’s conservatism helps it scoop competitors on stories they get wrong or miss entirely because of liberal bias. In April 2002, for instance, the mainstream media rushed to report an Israeli “massacre†of Palestinian civilians in a refugee camp in the West Bank city of Jenin; Fox uniquely—and correctly, it turned out—treated the massacre charge with complete skepticism. “We try to avoid falling for the conventional liberal wisdom in journalistic circles—in this case the conventional wisdom ‘Israeli bad, Palestinian good,’ †says daytime anchorman David Asman. “Too often ideology shapes the tendency to jump to a conclusion—something we try to be aware of in our own case, too.â€


Entire article: We’re Not Losing the Culture Wars Anymore City Journal - Autum 2003
 
FOX is neo-conservative, not conservative. Rupert Murdoch's network has the sleeziest shows of all the networks, like "Temptation Island".

And folks should remember that Republicans just voted in known womanizer to the governor's seat in California. Of the two, Governor Grey Davis was the more cultural conservative. Davis has never cheated on his wife and would most assuredly never grab a woman's breast without their permission, unlike the governor-elect. Bustamante was also.

The Republican Party is anything but conservative, IMHO. And true conservatives have already lost the culture war because they allied with folks (in the GOP) who used them to get themselves power and resources and are preparing to toss them aside.

My two cents.
 
wr4ma,gun control aids rapist

1st, welcome to THR.
2nd
Davis has never cheated on his wife and would most assuredly never grab a woman's breast without their permission, unlike the governor-elect. Bustamante was also.
Davis is well known for losing his temper and being verbally abusive to women on his staff.
Davis refused to look at exonerating evidence of battered women
Who are to this day wasting away in PRK's prisons,the only crime they committed was self defense.
The people who made a big poop about Arnold (who I did not vote for)
never said peep about the Clinton rape and sex assault allegations:
Davis cared not one wit about womens rights when it came to self defense.
The only way a women could protect her self and her children from a man the size of Arnold would be gun
Davis was a dirt bag who stomped on womens right to self defense,
don't be charmed by his pro baby killing stance (abortion)
9-10-03: Davis reverses Board of Prison Terms's recommendation to parole woman who was convicted at 18 of killing her abuser, prior to the allowance of testimony regarding battering and its effects.

Twice the Board of Prison Terms has recommended Woodmore’s release, and twice the Governor has decided to keep her in prison.
Flozelle had no prior criminal history when she was convicted of second-degree murder at age 18, prior to the allowance of testimony regarding battering and its effects in California criminal trials (such evidence has been allowed since 1992). She is now 35 years old, with two grown children. News of the governor's parole reversal hit Flozelle's family late last night (9-10-03).

Juliette Lett, one of Flozelle's sisters, said tearfully, "It's so unfair. It's not like she hasn't done her time, or shown that she can be a productive member of society. Where is the justice? It doesn't make any sense to me. My niece [Flozelle's daughter] is going to be devastated."

Flozelle's ailing stepmother had this to say: "She has lost so much of being a mother to her children, who went from babies to children to young adults now. She missed out on all of it. I think Davis is a dog--he doesn't have a heart. He has to take into consideration that she was young. The abuse is something she held and held until she exploded. Her boyfriend could've killed her, instead of the other way around
 
This is a general question and observation not aimed at anyone in this thread, something I have wondered for a while. Why do some people on the left hate Fox News with so much passion? I have had conversations with people both online and in real life and out of no where someone goes into a foaming-at-the-mouth shouting rant about why Fox is so evil yet they do not give one example or reason. It has happened a few times on this board as well, same with www.packing.org out of nowhere and completely unrelated to the topic at hand.

I think Arnold was at a roudy party when he touched the female, something everyone was doing to everyone else. It was a mostly bogus accusation, did not Gray Davis kiss an under age girl or something like that?
 
dustind,

Over here we get Fox, but our main version of the Murdoch TV service is Sky News. Its just as bad as Fox, almost like a live action version of the Sun newspaper.

During the conflict in the Gulf recently Sky unashamedly broadcast that the forces were now getting their information from it, rather than the BBC who were more questioning of what was going on in the region and the reasons for it. Then came the Kelly/Gilligan affair, and quietly announced (and ignored by the Murdoch-owned press) was the amazing revelation that a Sky News reporter had, using stock footage, been fabricating a report. The reporter was sacked and committed suicide.

Given that Gilligan's story was fundamentally backed up by two other reporters it seems strange that the government and the Murdoch-dominated media ignored this (just as people ignored FOX being caught lying, and then defending its right to lie) an actual case of invented news.
 
People vote with their channel changers

If you really believe in pure democracy, there isn't anything that is a pure populist contest more than TV ratings. Fox has the ratings.

Fox News has created a tremendous amount of downright hatred by folks on the left. Fox presents, at least in their own view, a more balanced point of view compared to what many felt was a left leaning approach by the three major networks, CNN etc.

The fact that their ratings are going up steadily and the major networks along with CNN and MSNBC are declining precipitously is another way of a lot of people viting with their clickers. Like it or not they have a large and growing audience.

I love the idea of "progressives" calling for muzzling Fox by some form of boycotting their advertisers. Free speech is a great idea,... as long as you agree with what they are saying I guess.

As far as Arnold's real or imaginary gropings, let's see how many of the women that accused him three to five days before the election now come forward to press charges? Call me when the first criminal or civil charges are filed, OK? If none do, then you know it was another Gray Davis dirty election trick, this one backfired big time it seems.

(Or is it another case of the Bush family secret cabal, backed up by some of those vicious neo-cons, whatever they are, supressing and controlling the news, hmmmm?) Honestly some days I go through a whole roll of tinfoil protecting myself from all these conspiracy theories.

Don P.
 
Good news!

But watch out....if the culture war is really won, next stop is 'conservosclerosis' , like what's happened to the Left.

Agricola, I wasn't aware that Gilligan had been vindicated. How so?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top