Is the Ability to Handle Weapons Effectively an Indicator of Possibly Superior

Status
Not open for further replies.
Combat vet here to. I pretty much agree training and knowing what to do is very important. Do they indicate how well you do in combat?
I don't think so because some guys reacted in ways I did not expect. Tested by fire is an old saying that's true. I respect fellow vets in a way I cannot explain. It is a serious thing.
 
The question is whether there is a corellation between a high level of fireams management and a measure of stress control, not if it REPLACES combat experience, or is an end all to training, etc. Just if you all think it is a good indicator of a person LIKELY to do better under stress.
 
Second the NOPE
I was a Combat medic (as in I was on the line, not changing bed pans)

I knew of two good medics, when it came time to perform under fire (actually by then the firing had stopped) the failed, completely flustered.
In train they were great, they knew their stuff, the were wonderful on sickcall (clinic) but under stress they fell flat.

That said, I think training can help, you go through a full up "Aw, ****" brown drawers sequence, where the person going in KNOWS NOTHING of what is to happen. Then you analize it, you walk it through step by step, then run through it.

And then you throw them into something completely different and see which way they jump, eventually you CAN train the jump out of them.

OK, and here is the BUT
Alot of the hesitation and uncertainy comes from having to cycle from 'everything is all right' to 'I'm under attack'

Take a Kung Fu movie analogy, Kung Fu master gets attack taking a walk and smelling the flowers he reacts, he doesn't have to spin up in a OODA loop, he has trained himself to the point where he has the Heuristics and reactions to short cut conscious decisions.

when he's attacked his mind recognizes "under attack" and reacts accordingly

where a student may know ALL the same moves as the master
but when attacked his though process is much longer
first having to come to realize it IS an attack (and get past denial- BIG POINT)
Then he has to remember what to do.

I think most people fall into the second category
and most people will fall into DENIAL and fail to react to the threat in a timely manner
no matter what their range skill, they may be a perfect shot, may have a blazing quick draw. If they don't train themselves and ready their mind to fight back, they won't or they will have a major delay deciding to start to fight back.

Read true crime, Sam I think you linked the BTK confession, every victim fought back, almost every victim either gave in or failed to react to the initial attack. The true struggle didn't happen until they realized they were going to die. Those that fought back immediately where the victims that managed to escape or survive.
 
I've seen men fall back and rely on training to get them through a stressful scenario such as a shooting, and ive seen men of equal training freeze under fire. I still say there is no substitute for training/preparation, but it doesn't seem to be the dispositive factor of stress management.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top