Just Completed First Long Range Build

Status
Not open for further replies.

mossyshooter

Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2010
Messages
39
Location
New York
Well its been awhile and I just finished up putting together my first dedicated long range build. After careful consideration, I came up with a bunch of criteria that it would have to fit in. It would have to be powerful enough to hunt with out to a minimum of 1000 yards, fit in a standard Remington 700 action, and be able to magazine feed with the latest in monolithic VLD solids seated to the lands.

With all that in mind I settled on using a short action case in a long action. That would allow for magazine feeding of soild copper VLD projectiles. What I wasn't sure of was if a short action case would have enough boiler room to launch a 250 gr projectile with sufficient velocity to expand at 1000 yards. I selected on a 338-300 WSM and Cutting Edge's 250 gr LAZER single feed projectile. Quickload showed i should be able to push them to the low 2700 fps range. It expands down to 1500 fps and with a g1 bc of .67 should expand out to over 1000 yards.

So I got down to ordering parts. I ordered a Shilen 27 inch #6 contour select match barrel with a 1-9 twist ratchet rifling and topped it off with a Lil Bastard muzzle break. For the action I chose a Stiller Precision Predator long action. For the bottom metal decided to run Wyatt's extended detachable box mag for a 300 win mag. That allows for magazine feeding with even the longest vld projectiles. For the stock I selected a Bell and Carlson's M40 Varmint Tactical Stock with an aluminum bedding block. Being this is a long range rig and will most likely be shot prone, the angled forearm allows for minute elevation adjustments simply by sliding the rifle forward or rearward on the bag. The trigger is a timney flat trigger and for optics its wearing a Vortex Viper PST 6-24x50 scope. Total package weight comes in right at about 12 lbs.

Even before I got all the parts in I ordered a set of reloading dies from Redding. Case forming is easy. Simply take 325 WSM brass and run it through the FL die and you're done. I did make one modification to the throat of the barrel though. Taking a que from Roy Weatherby, I decided to lengthen the throat to allow for more velocity and less pressure. However I didn't want to make the throat so long that accuracy suffers. I measured the bearing surface of the 250 gr LAZER projectile and cut the throat just a hair shorter so the bullet is never unsupported by either the case neck or the rifling but it should allow for more speed. Once everything was together it came time to start working up a load for it.

20150402_205202.jpg

20150410_175418.jpg

20150410_175352.jpg

20150410_175337.jpg

20150410_175332.jpg

20150410_175408.jpg


So far I have only tried 2 powders. One being Reloader 17 and the other being H4350. RL 17 seems to be coming out on top so far with better accuracy and much tighter velocity spread. I started at 56 grains and gradually worked up. The longer throat definitely helped velocity and keep the pressures down without sacrificing accuracy. At 64 grains I started to notice my extreme spreads increased slightly so I called that max. 64 gr of RL17 with the 250 gr LAZER projectile 15 thousandths off the lands netted a whopping average of 2827 fps with an extreme spread of 16 fps. Brass looks perfectly normal with no pressure signs at all. Accuracy is absolutely stellar shooting 3/4 inch and under groups at 200 yards. Recoil is less than my 6.5x55 with full power loads. The Lil Bastard break does a great job of taming down the recoil. You can shoot this gun all day long with no discomfort whatsoever.

20150408_204756.jpg

20150410_174843.jpg

20150410_180844.jpg

All in all I couldn't be more pleased with how this project turned out. As you can see, when you do not limit the case by trying to stuff a nearly 2 inch long bullet down inside it to try to get it to fit in a short action, there is no reason why you cannot match and exceed 338 win mag ballistics. It is nipping at the heals of the 338 lapua burning significantly less powder, fits in a standard sized action, and magazine feeds with vld bullets. Something the bigger 338's cannot do. With a muzzle velocity of nearly 2830 fps, it has an effective hunting range of over 1100 yards with the 250 gr LAZER projectile and for paper punching, it doesn't go subsonic till the 1 mile mark and CE's 252 gr MTH bullet doesn't go subsonic till nearly 2000 yards! All in all it looks like I have a real winner on my hands here. I hope to put it to good use on elk in the next couple of years.
 
mossyshooter

Super nice custom build! And a great job (and results), with your research and components selection.
 
Great build on what looks to be a great caliber. I do cringe when I hear people talking about hunting at extreme distances. At 1000 yds a wind mis-read will miss or worse cripple an animal and at 1000yds there is no 'quick' follow up shot. On paper a mis-read allows for a adjustment and all that's lost is points.
 
it has an effective hunting range of over 1100 yards

:rolleyes: Have you ever shot at 1k? If you have, then you would know that hunting at that distance shows a lack of respect for whatever game animal you are shooting at. I shot in 1,000 yard competition for 6 years, and I would never attempt a cold bore shot at that distance at whatever game animal you intend to hunt. Just MHO.

Don
 
You really did your homework on that rifle Mossy Shooter. It looks good
and apparently it shoots just as well. Good luck with it.

Zeke
 
Id say some of the comments about long range hunting may be right, but id be hypocritical at that point...well, maybe that would have been the case before anyways.

That being said, Ive shot whitetails out to 600 or so yards with a 223. Terrible idea in retrospect, but I was a kid and it took time to learn things for myself being that my father is too busy farming and I had too much time to go out and shoot things. At 600 yards, I was basically lobbing them with a intent to hit the deer where I was aiming, but any shot not directly through both lungs, heart, or head was equivalent to shooting them poorly with an arrow.

Over the years, I have pounded it into my head that long range is "target shooting" and hunting is the ability to become part of your surroundings and the goal is to be as close to your game and to be clean with your kills. So while I shoot much bigger calibers than a 223 and such now, I still do not take pop shots or even carefully calculated ones just due to risk. I do my best to be as close as I can. I figure Ill save the long range shots at live objects for war where the intent is not always to kill as much as it is to take combatants out of the fight.

You seem to have the skill and know how for sure to make long range shots, but the ethics of doing so in MY opinion are not too sound depending on what you are doing. I could see stretching out a little further if you are varmint hunting (poor shots are usually clean misses or still result in good kills) or if you are out west where you just cant help it. It does really suck though putting that much money into a gun that is capable of doing what you want, only to be told by several that it is probably not a good idea if you could get closer. I personally know people who see deer out in the bottoms and will GET FURTHER away to see how far they can hit them from. Seems pretty stupid, but not getting closer when you can isn't a ton better.

Not flaming you or anything here, just putting in my $0.02. Not worth much with my lack of experience, but I do know that it is ultimately up to the individual what is right and wrong based on many variables.
 
This rifle was purpose built as a dual purpose long range hunting/target rifle hence why there are features characteristic of both types incorporated into its design. It was built with the intention of use out west where the potential for extremely long shots without an option to get closer exists. I regularly practice running my 22lr with subs out to 350 yards and beyond. It makes a great long range trainer and have compiled enough data to reliably calculate cold bore hits on my 6 inch spinner target with boring regularity. At 350 yards the 22 has nearly identical drop, and a bit more wind drift than the 338-300 does at 1000 yards. The only other variable for the 338 being coriolis effect. The beauty about this package is that it can be very easily scaled down to a more traditional sporter weight rifle. Something that again the larger 338s are somewhat harder pressed to do. Ultimately it comes down to the shooter, his gear, and environmental conditions that constitute an ethical shot. And as for not trying to get closer, 90% of my deer kills have been under 50 yards with only 3 over 200 yards in the past 7 years so for those of you that are so quick to judge, you might want to pause for a moment before flaming others. So for those of you that think you have to be within stick and string range to be a real hunter here's a list of my deer kills for the past few years.
20 gauge slug, 40 ft. Recovery distance, 25 yards.
223 WSSM, 220 yards. Recovery distance 20 ft.
50 cal mz, 15 yards. Recovery distance 25 yards.
50 cal mz, 15 yards. Recovery distance 25 yards.
223 Rem, 90 yards. Recovery distance 15 ft.
50 cal mz, 15 ft. Recovery distance DRT.
50 cal mz, 35 ft. Recovery distance DRT.
6.5X55, 35 yards. Recovery distance 75 yards.
6.5x55, 100 yards. Recovery distance 35 yards.
7.62x54R, 15 ft. Recovery distance 40 yards.
300 blackout, 40 yards. Recovery distance 25 yards.
300 blackout, 20 yards. Recovery distance 50 yards.
300 blackout, 50 yards. Recovery distance 15 yards.
300 blackout, 230 yards. Recovery distance 10 ft.
6.5x55, 330 yards. Recovery distance 35 ft.
 
Last edited:
I guess that's a long answer that means, "No, I've never shot at 1,000 yards". Your talk about the "coriolis effect" says you have read a lot, but have no practical experience. At 1,000 yards you don't worry about the coriolis effect. You are too darn busy worrying about the wind changes to think of trivial things like that. In addition to the difficulty of making a clean cold bore shot at 1,000 yards, you also have the added complication of accurate range estimation. If you are off by just 50 yards in your range estimation (animal is 950 yards instead of 1,000 yard), your dope for that range will result in your bullet going 3 foot over the animal. And, a 5mph full value wind (just a light breeze felt on your face) will result in a 2 foot horizontal bullet deviation. Oh, and then there is the 1.4 seconds it takes for the bullet to arrive at 1,000 yards. Perhaps you can convince the game animal to remain still and not move. Yeah, I'd say you thought this out real good.:rolleyes:

Don
 
This rifle was purpose built as a dual purpose long range hunting/target rifle hence why there are features characteristic of both types incorporated into its design. It was built with the intention of use out west where the potential for extremely long shots without an option to get closer exists. I regularly practice running my 22lr with subs out to 350 yards and beyond. It makes a great long range trainer and have compiled enough data to reliably calculate cold bore hits on my 6 inch spinner target with boring regularity. At 350 yards the 22 has nearly identical drop, and a bit more wind drift than the 338-300 does at 1000 yards. The only other variable for the 338 being coriolis effect. The beauty about this package is that it can be very easily scaled down to a more traditional sporter weight rifle. Something that again the larger 338s are somewhat harder pressed to do. Ultimately it comes down to the shooter, his gear, and environmental conditions that constitute an ethical shot.
Again, its different for every individual. I do not have the confidence you have to take those kind of shots.

Surely you could get closer than 1000 yards? Ive never hunted out west but it seems that one should be able to get closer than that. Ive hunted up in the Rockys with my uncle for bear but I haven't messed with the open plain stuff so I dont really have a clue there.
 
I guess that's a long answer that means, "No, I've never shot at 1,000 yards". Your talk about the "coriolis effect" says you have read a lot, but have no practical experience. At 1,000 yards you don't worry about the coriolis effect. You are too darn busy worrying about the wind changes to think of trivial things like that. In addition to the difficulty of making a clean cold bore shot at 1,000 yards, you also have the added complication of accurate range estimation. If you are off by just 50 yards in your range estimation (animal is 950 yards instead of 1,000 yard), your dope for that range will result in your bullet going 3 foot over the animal. And, a 5mph full value wind (just a light breeze felt on your face) will result in a 2 foot horizontal bullet deviation. Oh, and then there is the 1.4 seconds it takes for the bullet to arrive at 1,000 yards. Perhaps you can convince the game animal to remain still and not move. Yeah, I'd say you thought this out real good.

Don
Couldn't have said it much better myself Don.
 
lynn.dimick,

Animals move. 1.4 seconds is time enough with a sudden movement to change the perfectly planned shot into a clean miss. Worse, movement can also take a shot headed for the "boiler room" straight into a gut shot leaving a wounded animal with a 1,000 yard head start to lose you.

The antithesis of ethical hunting IMHO.
 
Last edited:
By the way, that build is really nice. I realize the discussion has probably taken a turn away from the build itself and Ive had that happen a few times on me as well. Appreciate being able to see your work. Very nice.
 
Why in the hell would I not be using a rangefinder and kestral for shots that long? Clearly I put more thought into this than you did before firing off your mouth. Lets keep the discussion on the build and quit acting so butt hurt or has THR fallen to the armchair commandos as well?
 
mossyshooter,

I among the others admire the rifle and what you have done to date, but didn't you bring up the parameter of hunting (elk by your own statement) at minimum 1,000 yards and bullet expansion at that range?

To bring that into the equation and not expect at LEAST mild questioning isn't realistic. I feel the responses have been high road. It just isn't a direct line from a maximum hunting shot of 330 yds (very good BTW, well done) to over 1,000 simply by building the correct rifle and developing the correct load. To leave out there unchallenged the impression that it is isn't high road but something else entirely.

I see these boards as existing for the exchange of experience, information and opinion. Perhaps you are looking for a mutual admiration society. IMHO it is to an extent irresponsible NOT to bring up the potential pitfalls and dubious nature of the 1,000 yard elk shot.

My humble suggestion is that if you don't want honest reaction, don't post it. I do commend your knowledge from research and the great workmanship of the rifle (also obvious shooting skill). I do question the 1,000 yard hunting goal to put it mildly.

Regards
 
Last edited:
Rswartsell,

Ok. I was just hoping you wouldn't tell me the report of the shot. :)

I am aware that just about anything can scare an animal.

I do think it is a cool project he has going.
 
I don't want to belabor a point but the animal doesn't have to be scared to move enough to ruin such a long range shot. Simply grazing an animal can see a particularly attractive tuft at the moment of the shot and "Oh, look at that!" shift its graze and gut shot here we come.

P.S. Absolutely cool project! Far above what the average shooter can do for sure. The rest has already been said.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top