commygun
Member
About six years ago I had a revolver I wanted to sell. I told a women I worked with about it and she later told me her son
was interested in it. A couple days after that I sold it to him.
Now, I know this family pretty well and the son was a hard-
working, mild-mannered, law-abiding, church-going veteran
in his 20's. What no one knew, not his mother and certainly
not me, was that he was on the verge of acquiring a relitively
brief but very intense affection for heroin. His addiction took
the expected route, selling his possessions for drug money
and eventually ending up in ICU from an overdose. Fortunately,
he was able to clean up, go into recovery, get a job, marry
and generally get on with his life. Not long after he sobered
up I asked his Mom if he still had the revolver and was he
interested in selling it back to me (and I was curious if it had
maybe made it's way into the wrong hands). She told me that
he had pawned it to get money for drugs which (perversely
perhaps, considering what he had gone through) was a
relief, for if the pawn shop sold it the buyer would have to
fill out the usual paper work and there would be some sort
of record of the change of ownership.
Well anyway, today I got a letter from the local Narcotics Task
Force informing that they had this revolver this revolver and a
case, that I was the last known owner, and that I have sixty days
to reclaim my property.
This raises several questions that perhaps an LEO or someone
who has had a similiar experience can give an opinion on. The
fact that the case was with the gun makes me think the gun
was confiscated in a drug raid and was not actually taken while
being used in a crime. Nevertheless, does this come back on me
in any legal way? I sold the gun but since I'm the last person
who filled out paperwork does that make me the legal owner
in the law's eyes and can I recover the gun? Should I even
try to recover the gun or should I let the sixty days lapse
and the gun be destroyed? I'd like to have it back but does
reclaiming it compromise me in any way?
Obviously the man I sold it to did not pawn the gun but
traded it for drugs. Unless the pawn shop sold it out the back
door there would be records indicating a later owner than me.
I have to admit all this has given me a bit of a pause. Over
the years I've filled out the paperwork for dozens of guns and
many of them I've sold in private party transactions, usually at
the local gunshow. I've never sold to anyone I was remotely
suspicious of but there's no way to know where that gun's
going to end up with your name still attached to it. Now I
certainly don't believe that I'm endlessly responsible for
a gun just because I was the first to own it But undoubtedly
there are LEO's, lawyers, victims, survivors and assorted
anti's who would be only to happy to make that assumption.
In the future any gun that has paper associating it with me
will be sold only to a licensed dealer or to someone I know
VERY well or not sold at all.
Any thoughts or insights would be much appreciated.
was interested in it. A couple days after that I sold it to him.
Now, I know this family pretty well and the son was a hard-
working, mild-mannered, law-abiding, church-going veteran
in his 20's. What no one knew, not his mother and certainly
not me, was that he was on the verge of acquiring a relitively
brief but very intense affection for heroin. His addiction took
the expected route, selling his possessions for drug money
and eventually ending up in ICU from an overdose. Fortunately,
he was able to clean up, go into recovery, get a job, marry
and generally get on with his life. Not long after he sobered
up I asked his Mom if he still had the revolver and was he
interested in selling it back to me (and I was curious if it had
maybe made it's way into the wrong hands). She told me that
he had pawned it to get money for drugs which (perversely
perhaps, considering what he had gone through) was a
relief, for if the pawn shop sold it the buyer would have to
fill out the usual paper work and there would be some sort
of record of the change of ownership.
Well anyway, today I got a letter from the local Narcotics Task
Force informing that they had this revolver this revolver and a
case, that I was the last known owner, and that I have sixty days
to reclaim my property.
This raises several questions that perhaps an LEO or someone
who has had a similiar experience can give an opinion on. The
fact that the case was with the gun makes me think the gun
was confiscated in a drug raid and was not actually taken while
being used in a crime. Nevertheless, does this come back on me
in any legal way? I sold the gun but since I'm the last person
who filled out paperwork does that make me the legal owner
in the law's eyes and can I recover the gun? Should I even
try to recover the gun or should I let the sixty days lapse
and the gun be destroyed? I'd like to have it back but does
reclaiming it compromise me in any way?
Obviously the man I sold it to did not pawn the gun but
traded it for drugs. Unless the pawn shop sold it out the back
door there would be records indicating a later owner than me.
I have to admit all this has given me a bit of a pause. Over
the years I've filled out the paperwork for dozens of guns and
many of them I've sold in private party transactions, usually at
the local gunshow. I've never sold to anyone I was remotely
suspicious of but there's no way to know where that gun's
going to end up with your name still attached to it. Now I
certainly don't believe that I'm endlessly responsible for
a gun just because I was the first to own it But undoubtedly
there are LEO's, lawyers, victims, survivors and assorted
anti's who would be only to happy to make that assumption.
In the future any gun that has paper associating it with me
will be sold only to a licensed dealer or to someone I know
VERY well or not sold at all.
Any thoughts or insights would be much appreciated.