So I have been wanting a new carry gun for a while now. I like the looks & size of the M&P 2.0 40 compact. I was wondering about the opinions of those who have experience with the new 2.0 guns. I am thinking about selling my old XD-40 & PT 111 G-2 & picking one up.
M&P 2.0?
- Thread starter Mike J
- Start date
- Status
TomJ
Contributing Member
This^. The only thing I'd add is that with the grip having a sandpaper type texture, you'll want a holster that keeps the grip from having contact with your skin. I like the grips, but if they're too rough you can lightly sand them.
Old Dog
Member
There are only two striker-fired, polymer-framed semi-autos whose ergonomics, accuracy, reliability, sights and triggers I trust: M&P 2.0 and SIG P320.
You can't go wrong with any of the 2.0s.
You can't go wrong with any of the 2.0s.
mdThanatos
Member
I have the 2.0 FS 9mm and really like the improvements they did. I don't find the grip too aggressive at all. I ended up buying a Shield 2.0 as well, the texture isn't as rough on it though. I like the 2.0 and plan on keeping this one, and bought 12 extra mags to go with it and any others I may come across at a good deal.
Col. Cornelius
Member
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2017
- Messages
- 59
I prefer the M&P 2.0C to the Glock 19 (same size). Fits my hand better and the grip angle is what I am used to (1911).
I now have over 3,000 rnds thru the M&P 2.0C without a single malfunction. I did upgrade it with an Apex Action Enhancement Polymer Trigger & Duty/Carry Kit. Good upgrade but not required.
I now have over 3,000 rnds thru the M&P 2.0C without a single malfunction. I did upgrade it with an Apex Action Enhancement Polymer Trigger & Duty/Carry Kit. Good upgrade but not required.
Dollar for dollar, I consider both the M&P 2.0 9mm and .40 to be the best of today's polymer pistols.
I will go a further step and state that IMO they are equal or better than many 1911's that cost so much more.
S&W really scored a winner with this design.
I will go a further step and state that IMO they are equal or better than many 1911's that cost so much more.
S&W really scored a winner with this design.
Pat Riot
Contributing Member
Narwhal
Member
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2010
- Messages
- 261
I have a 2.0 in 9mm. i had to send it back once for failures to extract. I have fired about 500 rounds since repair and it is nice with no malfunctions. Its as accurate as my H&K P30, 4" groups at 25 us, but I prefer the trigger and ergos. With any M&P I unfortunately believe you need to shoot at least a few thousand rounds to test reliability. Mine didnt develop problens until about 2000 rounds after purchase. Dont spend more than $400 for an M&P. i have 7 m&p's total and 3 have gone back for problems at one pointor another, granted ive easily shot 20k rounds through mine.
Overall my 2.0 9mm is my favorite pistol.
Overall my 2.0 9mm is my favorite pistol.
danez71
Member
What is “A & B”?
I think he means compare them side by side. A vs B at the same time. He didn't do that.
Pat Riot
Contributing Member
Ah! Thank you. I see that now. Haha...I was racking my brain on this one for a couple of minutes. Thanks.
That is the way I read it also. The first time I hear the term it was in reference to comparing stereo speakers, where they'd switch the same source music between to two sets and ask, "Do you prefer A (switch sets) or B?"
Old Dog
Member
At the prices you can get the 2.0 for, absolutely. With quality night sights, still less than any Glock with its cheap-ass plastic non-night sights, and (unless you qualify for first-responder pricing), typically much less than the worthy SIG P-320.
scaatylobo
Member
Looking at buying a compact 2.0 in 9mm.
But not even slightly interested if they are still in T&E stage and have an issue ?.
My deal still hasn't gone through yet. I guess I will call the guy this week & see if he wants them or not. If he doesn't I have someone else that is interested but I am not in a rush. I don't have to do anything in a hurry. I do believe this is the way I am going to go though.
Another question, Is it hard to find holsters for these. Would a holster made for a G-23 or 19 likely fit a M&P 2.0 compact?
Another question, Is it hard to find holsters for these. Would a holster made for a G-23 or 19 likely fit a M&P 2.0 compact?
Anything that is made for the M&P compact or full size will work with the 2.0. Glock holsters normally will not work.
mdThanatos
Member
They are good to go.
Old Dog
Member
The compact 2.0s, both the 3.6: and the original 4" in 9mm are excellent. No issues whatsoever reported, and this pistol is receiving almost unanimously positive reviews everywhere.
Randy Werth
Member
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2018
- Messages
- 1
.
Last edited:
George P
member
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2018
- Messages
- 7,772
I got the 2.0 in 9mm for $350 OTD from Brownell's; what intrigued was the varying sizes of backstraps. I own Glocks and the Gen 3 with the finger grooves has just never felt right. I can shoot it good enough for its intended purpose (nightstand gun), but I have wide hands but my fingers are a little shorter ratio-wise. The varying backs on the 2.0 allowed me to get a grip that really feels better in my hands. I also just got a SIG P365 and that also feels a lot better than my G26, so my days of Glocks might be numbered...... 
- Status
Similar threads
