Man kills Grizz with Arrow

Status
Not open for further replies.

waterhill

Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2008
Messages
64
Location
East Texas
For those heading out for wapiti, be carefull out there....


News
Father's bow shot kills grizzly attacking his son


By Carole Cloudwalker



This document was published online on Wednesday, September 24, 2008

Printable E-mail Archives 117 comment(s) Comments

A bloodied Ron J. Leming, 37, bends over the 11-year old grizzly bear (No. 1029) that attacked him twice Friday along Castle Creek on the South Fork while he and his father, Ron G. Leming, 62, were on their annual bowhunt in search of elk. The elder Leming managed a tough shot with an arrow that killed the bear and saved his son’s life. (Photo by Ron G. Leming)
A Cody bowhunter in search of an elk found a grizzly bear instead in a Sept. 12 mauling incident on the South Fork.

And Ron J. Leming, 37, attributes his father's lifetime of bowhunting for saving his life.

“There are not many people who could stand their ground like that, especially with a bow and arrow,” Leming said Wednesday.

“I would have been mauled way worse, if not killed, if Dad hadn't had the nerve to stand his ground and shoot that bear with his bow. There's not many people who could have done that.”

Leming said his father's shot with a compound bow severed a major artery in the bear and hit his heart. The bear then moved about 80 yards down hill after being shot before falling dead over a log.

Leming's father, Ron G. Leming, 62, rushed to his son after the grizzly's initial attack, and managed the compound bow shot as both his son and the bear were running down the hill.

“Dad had missed two shots at elk” earlier in the several-day hunting trip to the family's favorite spot, Leming said.

“The night before, Dad said a prayer for God to guide his arrow.”

Leming added that while his father had elk, not bears, in mind as he prayed, he's glad the right arrow found divine intervention.

“If my Dad hadn't been there, who knows?” Leming said. “The look the bear had, the way he was doing ... I could have done absolutely nothing.”

Leming and his father had taken their gear 15 miles up the trail from the Boulder Basin trailhead for their annual bowhunting outing. Though they had spotted a black bear and her cubs, there had been no sign of grizzlies, which Leming said was unusual.

On Friday morning they headed out from camp, located at about 9,500 feet in elevation, and spotted a good elk.

The elder Leming was standing about 30 yards down the hill when his son heard a noise behind him and turned to see the bear standing there.

“He was king of the woods,” Leming said. “He thought there was an elk in there and he would bring it down.”

Leming yelled at the bear, but it charged him.

Trying to pull the trigger release string on his bow, Leming realized there was no time to shoot the bear himself, so he moved behind a tree and began running around it to buy time. Then he ran down hill, figuring he could move faster in that direction.

“I passed my dad and I saw an arrow fly right by my leg, about two feet away,” Ron said. He realized his father had shot at the bear, but he was unsure if the arrow went home.

“I took three or four more steps and I fell,” he said, “The bear was on top of me.”

Leming was kicking at the grizzly and possibly put his hands out defensively.

“It's kind of blurry,” he said.

The bear grabbed Leming's arm and, “I felt like I was in a vice, with the power that thing had,” he said.

He managed to rise and head for a forked tree, where the bear again jumped on his back.

“It was pretty scary,” the long-time hunter said.

The bear attacked again and Leming was hitting him with his bow as well as struggling with the animal, who suddenly moved away.

“He took a few steps toward Dad, then he started walking down the hill. I told Dad to kill him, but he (bear) was already starting to check out,” Leming said.

The bear soon fell on a log, dead.

“I got super cold - I think I was in shock,” Leming said.

His father kept asking how badly he was hurt, and he said he felt OK, considering what he'd been through.

“Things got blurry and I lay there for about 45 minutes. I thought I was going to pass out.”

The two men finally were able to get back to camp - Leming walked because he was unable to mount his horse.

They made sure the camp was clean and Leming “stood on the bear box” to get on his paint mare, Josie, which his father led over.

They took their other horses and got to the trailhead, then loaded the horses and even stopped by the Leming home to drop them off before going to West Park Hospital.

Leming was admitted overnight. He received stitches for wounds to his hands and arm, and the bites on his back were patched up as well.

Dennie Hammer, information specialist for the Game and Fish Department in Cody, said the men spotted a bull elk and were about to take aim when the elk spooked, probably because he spied the bear.

“They were trying to call in the elk when he spooked,” Hammer said.

Leming stood up and so did the grizzly, an 11-year-old male that was about 15 feet from the hunters.

“The bear charged and bit (Leming) on the right arm,” Hammer said.

“His father shot the bear with an arrow,” Hammer said.

The bear, though mortally wounded, charged the younger Leming again, this time biting his left hand and arm, as Hammer described the 9 a.m. incident.

By the time a game warden could reach the spot where the attack took place, the bear's body was badly decomposed because of high temperatures during the weekend, Hammer said.

For that reason, the bear's carcass was left where it fell. Hammer said it appears the grizzly was known to game officials, though he did not know whether the bear had worn a tag or radio collar.

He was captured in 2003 after he broke into a shed at Brown Thomas Meadows on the upper South Fork, Hammer said, and was relocated to the Jackson area.

The Friday incident remains under investigation, but Hammer said it appears to be a case of self-defense.

In such instances, it's legal to kill a grizzly bear, he added.

He said while grizzlies are no longer considered a threatened species, no hunting season for them has been established. They are under G&F management and eventually a season will be set, Hammer added.
 
People kill Grizzlies/Browns/Kodiaks with arrows.

header1.jpg


I've seen this bear, mounted. It's BIG. The hunter is one mild-mannered dude; if you met him on the street, you wouldn't guess what he does. He shot this bear from 17 yards.

http://www.performancebowhunting.com/index.html
 
here's a pic of Ron with the bear after the attack.

grizzly1.jpg


His dad with the bear.

grizzly2.jpg


The bear was autopsied and showed that it was well over 500 lbs(the grizzlies in that area average 350lbs) and 11 years old(which is in it's prime). Following the path of the arrow, the autopsy showed that the arrow went in, hit a main artery, then bent, and hit the heart!
A one in a thousand shot they said.
 
here's another shot of the victim......I don't think he faked it. Sounds like it was just the last ditch effort from a dying bear hit by a lucky shot.

Grizzley3.jpg
 
No, but he did describe having his arm in the bruin's mouth. Yet he seems well enough to pose by the kill. And while I see some blood marks on his face, I still see a face, and no deep tissue scars. These attacks leave distinct and terrible wounds, not little blood trails. I would want to see the scars, that's all. I'm not making any accusations, but something about the tale does alert the old spidey sense. Also, it almost looks like the lip was pulled up post-kill to expose the fangs. That's odd behavior after a mauling.
 
here's more from what I read....


Ron, who is an experienced hunter and used to be a guide, was calling an elk for his dad, who was down hill 40 yards. The elk suddenly spooked and then Ron heard a noise behind him. He turned around and a grizzly was 15 feet behind him. He tried to shoo it away but it proceeded
toward him. He went behind a tree and the bear kept coming, so he took off on his 'death run' down hill towards his dad. With the grizzly just feet behind his son, and running full speed, Ron's dad shot one arrow.
Ron saw the arrow fly by his leg, unsure of whether it hit the bear, and within a few more steps, Ron was on his back with the grizzly on top of him. With is arms shielding his head, Ron kicked and punched the bear with all he had. Ron said it all went to fast and he was so full of
adrenaline, he could not feel any pain at the time of the attack. When the bear continued to attack, Ron's dad, could see that the bear was bleeding badly from the arrow, and he went over and started beating on the bear with his bow(You can not carry guns during bow hunting, so he had nothing to shoot it). The bear continued to attack Ron, biting clear through his left hand and glove, and down to the bone of his right arm just below the elbow. Then the bear, stopped, looking at Ron's dad, walked away several yards, and rolled over dead.
 
Cosmo, If those shots were taken just after the incident, that man has enough adrenalin in his blood to last a few hours, he ain't feelin' any pain just yet, his arm may have been bitten to the bone, no way to tell. If it was a mauling he got out lucky to have a face.
 
I tend to think Cosmoline might be right. There is no blood on his jacket or his gloves that I can see. There is blood on the bear's claws however, making this an odd situation to figure out.

I'm not saying it didn't happen, but some of the stuff just seems off.
 
Actually, I didn't know lower 48 Grizz were that small on average. I'd have figured a 500 lber as average. Heck, and people sweat over whether .357 will stop a griz? Blackies can get 3-400 lbs. :rolleyes: I guess all that Brown bear in Alaska talk had me thinkin' they got bigger than that down here. I'll never have to worry about it in Texas. :D
 
Cosmo, If those shots were taken just after the incident, that man has enough adrenalin in his blood to last a few hours, he ain't feelin' any pain just yet, his arm may have been bitten to the bone, no way to tell. If it was a mauling he got out lucky to have a face.

That certainly could be, and it could be that the description we're getting has been "mauled" by the reporter and is not accurate. Maybe the attack was not as serious as described. It's a simple matter of comparing his story with his wounds, which I'm sure someone will do. What I can tell you is that the injuries, as described by this report do not match the photos.

THAT SAID, I remember seeing some photos of an airman and his brown bear that had some internet text added about how it was a mankiller, etc. AFAIK this text we're getting is some joker's addition and has NOTHING to do with the actual hunt. It may be that these guys just did a hunt, he got some bear blood on his face and they took pics. Nothing wrong with that at all. Then some jerk ont he internet steals the pics, adds an outrageous story about mauling and it takes on a life of its own. That's happened before. And newspapers have picked up the stories as true before, without checking. We shall see.
 
I'm in the Cosmo camp on this one. The guy's appearance doesn't match the description of the attack. The guy was supposedly bit in the arm and the hand but there are no blood stains or tears on the clothing there as show in the photos. The blood on his face looks very superficial. It also seems somewhat strange that you would take the time to take pictures after such an attack. I would think the first priority would be to get back and get your wounds treated and get a fifth of Jack.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top