Bwana John
Member
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2004
- Messages
- 2,960
I have been reloading for a .310 Cadet rifle and have figured out the variable heal diameter/brass thickness. (.321" bullet, .314" heel, .010" case thickness on cut down to 1.10" Starr 32-20 brass)
I have been full length resizing, decaping, priming, belling the case mouth, sizing/lubing the bullet, seating the bullet, and crimping. The end product is good ammo.
If I take a deprimed/reprimed case that has been fired in the rifle with nothing else done to it, put in powder, start the raw cast bullet into the case with my fingers, seat the bullet to correct OAL by pressing the bullet home against a piece of wood, then dip the projectile into melted beeswax it fits and fires in the rifle just fine for 5 reloads so far.
With the modern way I get a cartridge that is very robust, and take rough handleing, chambers and extracts well.
With the old school method my cases should last for many more reloads without work hardning, cases should fire form to the chamber being theoretically more precise, but the end product is fragile and a little messy and easy to contaminate the lube, and may have problems chambering if the chamber gets dirty. I have old factory Kynoch .310 ammo where the old lube must be laboriously removed before the cartridge will chamber.
What other pros and cons am I overlooking?
I have been full length resizing, decaping, priming, belling the case mouth, sizing/lubing the bullet, seating the bullet, and crimping. The end product is good ammo.
If I take a deprimed/reprimed case that has been fired in the rifle with nothing else done to it, put in powder, start the raw cast bullet into the case with my fingers, seat the bullet to correct OAL by pressing the bullet home against a piece of wood, then dip the projectile into melted beeswax it fits and fires in the rifle just fine for 5 reloads so far.
With the modern way I get a cartridge that is very robust, and take rough handleing, chambers and extracts well.
With the old school method my cases should last for many more reloads without work hardning, cases should fire form to the chamber being theoretically more precise, but the end product is fragile and a little messy and easy to contaminate the lube, and may have problems chambering if the chamber gets dirty. I have old factory Kynoch .310 ammo where the old lube must be laboriously removed before the cartridge will chamber.
What other pros and cons am I overlooking?