Jeb Stuart
member
Now that they have proven that they can ingest Nano into the APX family, I can't wait for the APX treatment to Px4.
Why do you think they will even consider ingesting the PX4 into the APX family? That would not make any sense at all. The Beretta Nano was the first striker fired pistol produced by Beretta. Striker fired, modular design etc. was the foundation of the APX models they now market. The PX4 is not a striker fired firearm any more than it is a revolver. The Beretta Nano in many ways was ahead of it's time in comparison to other firearms in the same class. Beretta now has a line of Striker Fired, modular guns, steel chassis,and basically the same foundation etc. They are all now in the APX line up. Bringing the Nano up to the ARX line was was not only a smart thing to do, but a decision that was completely justified.
Now maybe I read your statement wrong and if so, I apologize. Are you saying they should bring in features of the APX into the PX4?