Shear_stress
Member
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2005
- Messages
- 2,728
Did a little horsetrading and found myself a new satin nickel CZ-85 Combat in 9mmP. For those unfamiliar with it, the 85 is lefty-friendly version of the CZ75B. As for the "combat" designation, it somehow means adjustable sights, adjustable trigger over-travel, and no firing pin safety (the firing pin is secured by a stop, Browning-style). That last feature also means that, like the older Pre-B CZs, the 85 Combat can be dry fired with impunity--no roll pin to break. This is a good thing (see below).
My desire to trade for a nice 9mm range-only gun drew me to either a CZ or FN High Power. I would have been happy with either, but found the CZ first. Besides, and this may be sacreligious, but my Arcus shoots so well I wasn't sure if I "needed" an FN. What really clinched the deal, however, was that finish. You just don't see many CZ85s in the first place, let alone those in satin nickel. Attractive and durable, it makes for a very, very handsome pistol. Plus, I've already got a stable of black and blue pistols. It was nice to try something different.
Out of the box, the trigger pull was very smooth for a CZ. No "click" in the travel where the firing pin safety disengages. The pull was quite heavy, and the over-travel that remained (despite the adjustment) tended to make the muzzle move laterally when the hammer dropped. Fortunately, my P-01 showed that CZ triggers improve greatly with use. I can already feel a difference after some dry firing and range time. Failing that, the 85 Combat is said to take a trigger job pretty well.
At the range, the trigger pull was not a problem. Reliability wasn't, either. The CZ flawlessly fed, fired and ejected 100 rounds of WWB. Accuracy was great at 25 yards, thanks to the long sight radius and basic good design. The gun also attracted attention from folks I would not have expected. An older fellow, who was sporting an Inglis High Power, recognized the CZ and asked to try just two rounds through it. At 25 yards, he left two holes touching on the paper.
Everything is not perfect, however. Though the 85 is said to have better fit and finish than other CZs, I did not find this to be the case. There were a couple of cosmetic flaws that appeared on close inspection. One was some ragged machine work on the ejector port. The other was an apparently miscast serrate on the front of the trigger guard.
That aside, I plan to get a lot of use out of my new gun.
My desire to trade for a nice 9mm range-only gun drew me to either a CZ or FN High Power. I would have been happy with either, but found the CZ first. Besides, and this may be sacreligious, but my Arcus shoots so well I wasn't sure if I "needed" an FN. What really clinched the deal, however, was that finish. You just don't see many CZ85s in the first place, let alone those in satin nickel. Attractive and durable, it makes for a very, very handsome pistol. Plus, I've already got a stable of black and blue pistols. It was nice to try something different.
Out of the box, the trigger pull was very smooth for a CZ. No "click" in the travel where the firing pin safety disengages. The pull was quite heavy, and the over-travel that remained (despite the adjustment) tended to make the muzzle move laterally when the hammer dropped. Fortunately, my P-01 showed that CZ triggers improve greatly with use. I can already feel a difference after some dry firing and range time. Failing that, the 85 Combat is said to take a trigger job pretty well.
At the range, the trigger pull was not a problem. Reliability wasn't, either. The CZ flawlessly fed, fired and ejected 100 rounds of WWB. Accuracy was great at 25 yards, thanks to the long sight radius and basic good design. The gun also attracted attention from folks I would not have expected. An older fellow, who was sporting an Inglis High Power, recognized the CZ and asked to try just two rounds through it. At 25 yards, he left two holes touching on the paper.
Everything is not perfect, however. Though the 85 is said to have better fit and finish than other CZs, I did not find this to be the case. There were a couple of cosmetic flaws that appeared on close inspection. One was some ragged machine work on the ejector port. The other was an apparently miscast serrate on the front of the trigger guard.
That aside, I plan to get a lot of use out of my new gun.