Sorry in asdvance for the long post. My scale should arrive early next week so I've been surfing the internet and looking through reloading manuals all day trying to decide on recipes for my first load. I'm using Rainier 124gr plated bullets which aren't listed in many manuals so I'd like to some input to make sure I'm staying on the safe side of things.
Here is what I've got:
-1000 Once Fired WWB (all tumbled, resized, expanded & primer pockets cleaned)
-CCI 500 Primers
-Rainier 124gn Plated RN Bullets
-Titegroup, Unique, W231 Powders
Goals: Accurate (@7 -15yards), clean, subsonic target load.
Recipes:
Titegroup 3.6-4.2gn @ 1.125
Unique 4.4-5.4 @ 1.125
W231 3.8-4.4 @ 1.125
I figure I'd start from the min and work my way up to the max load in .2grain increments. I'll be making and testing 10 rounds at a time, marking the brass and checking for overpressure signs at the range. The TG and W231 loads closely resemble Hodgdon printed data from LRN-mid FMJ. I was somewhat on my own for Unique recipe. All the recipes I found were either <1000fps LRN loads, >1100 max FMJ loads (no min listed), or used a really short OAL. I'll attach my research. Do all of these loads look safe and appropriate for my goals and equipment?
The other thing I noticed is that the 9mm factory ammo I have on hand (WWB and Armscor) uses a COAL of 1.147-1.62 which is quite a bit longer than most of the published data I can find. I thought the rule of thumb was to use a COAL as long as you could manage without feeding or crimping problems so the bullet engages the rifling as early as possible. If all my guns feed WWB @ 1.162 why would I want to load @ 1.100? Is this just so the publishers' data will work with odd ball short/tight chambers and/or to keep themselves from getting sued if they publish a load close to the SAAMI max OAL and someone doesn't has a bullet set-back (overpressure) problem? If I'm looking for 1050-1100fps and I extend the published OAL from 1.090 to 1.15 to get the best accuracy might I not then have to go over the max load data to get the pressure/velocity back into the published range?
Here is what I've got:
-1000 Once Fired WWB (all tumbled, resized, expanded & primer pockets cleaned)
-CCI 500 Primers
-Rainier 124gn Plated RN Bullets
-Titegroup, Unique, W231 Powders
Goals: Accurate (@7 -15yards), clean, subsonic target load.
Recipes:
Titegroup 3.6-4.2gn @ 1.125
Unique 4.4-5.4 @ 1.125
W231 3.8-4.4 @ 1.125
I figure I'd start from the min and work my way up to the max load in .2grain increments. I'll be making and testing 10 rounds at a time, marking the brass and checking for overpressure signs at the range. The TG and W231 loads closely resemble Hodgdon printed data from LRN-mid FMJ. I was somewhat on my own for Unique recipe. All the recipes I found were either <1000fps LRN loads, >1100 max FMJ loads (no min listed), or used a really short OAL. I'll attach my research. Do all of these loads look safe and appropriate for my goals and equipment?
The other thing I noticed is that the 9mm factory ammo I have on hand (WWB and Armscor) uses a COAL of 1.147-1.62 which is quite a bit longer than most of the published data I can find. I thought the rule of thumb was to use a COAL as long as you could manage without feeding or crimping problems so the bullet engages the rifling as early as possible. If all my guns feed WWB @ 1.162 why would I want to load @ 1.100? Is this just so the publishers' data will work with odd ball short/tight chambers and/or to keep themselves from getting sued if they publish a load close to the SAAMI max OAL and someone doesn't has a bullet set-back (overpressure) problem? If I'm looking for 1050-1100fps and I extend the published OAL from 1.090 to 1.15 to get the best accuracy might I not then have to go over the max load data to get the pressure/velocity back into the published range?