kBob
Member
I was just doing Periodic Maintenance on my repro Remington NMAs this after noon and got to playing around.
Anybody cataloged the differences between the two brands?
I expected from all my reading that the Pietta would be bigger in all ways and it does seem to be a hair thicker as the cylinder will not fit the ASM window from top to bottom. I figured hey-hey lets see how much smaller the ASM cylinder looks in the pieta frame.....and would you believe the length of the ASM was too long to fit between the recoil plate and forcing cone on the Pietta?
Turns out the barrel on the ASM seems very slightly longer than the pieta when measured from the front of the frame than the Pietta.
Got me thinking about breaking out the calipers and doing some measuring just for giggles.
I had always heard the ASM felt less bulky in the hand than the Pietta and when I bought it at a show I thought the ASM was just the same.....until I held one in each hand and switched hands back and forth several times.....the ASM does feel smaller and in my hand better than the Pietta. Danged if I can SEE the difference though. The angles and tips of the hammers are a teenie-tiny bit different on the two guns but again the ASM just feels better, go figure.
Anyway before I go crazy with tearing things apart and measuring madly .....and even taking pictures to prove I did it..... has anyone else actually cataloged the differences?
How many different makes of repro Remington NMAs are out there and how are they all different?
How does the size of the originals ( the 1863 NMA that seems to get copied and called an 1858 by most folks) compare to each of the repros?
I will say the rifleng on the ASM also seems deeper and sharper than the Pietta's and looking at it from the muzzle immediately puts one in mind of Uberti's logo!
Thoughts, comments, and warnings all appreciated.
-kBob
Anybody cataloged the differences between the two brands?
I expected from all my reading that the Pietta would be bigger in all ways and it does seem to be a hair thicker as the cylinder will not fit the ASM window from top to bottom. I figured hey-hey lets see how much smaller the ASM cylinder looks in the pieta frame.....and would you believe the length of the ASM was too long to fit between the recoil plate and forcing cone on the Pietta?
Turns out the barrel on the ASM seems very slightly longer than the pieta when measured from the front of the frame than the Pietta.
Got me thinking about breaking out the calipers and doing some measuring just for giggles.
I had always heard the ASM felt less bulky in the hand than the Pietta and when I bought it at a show I thought the ASM was just the same.....until I held one in each hand and switched hands back and forth several times.....the ASM does feel smaller and in my hand better than the Pietta. Danged if I can SEE the difference though. The angles and tips of the hammers are a teenie-tiny bit different on the two guns but again the ASM just feels better, go figure.
Anyway before I go crazy with tearing things apart and measuring madly .....and even taking pictures to prove I did it..... has anyone else actually cataloged the differences?
How many different makes of repro Remington NMAs are out there and how are they all different?
How does the size of the originals ( the 1863 NMA that seems to get copied and called an 1858 by most folks) compare to each of the repros?
I will say the rifleng on the ASM also seems deeper and sharper than the Pietta's and looking at it from the muzzle immediately puts one in mind of Uberti's logo!
Thoughts, comments, and warnings all appreciated.
-kBob