In Kentucky, even resident fees have gone up. I buy a sportsman's license every year; this year it was $95, and I've bagged one deer, nothing else all year. For many years I bought one, and ended up with no place to fish or hunt. Next year (although not early enough in the year to be practical), I'll be eligible for a senior license, and I plan to take advantage of that....$12. We also have a resident senior lifetime sportsman's license, which is $180; I doubt I'd live long enough, or be spry enough for all those years, to make that one worthwhile.
If you want an example of non-resident fees that are truly worth complaining about, look at the Canadian provinces. Most of them gouge American hunters outrageously with their fees.
As for hunter numbers dropping, I believe that in my state, at least, there is no shortage of hunters, or potential hunters, even though license sales are indeed down. Desire to hunt among the populace is as great as I've ever seen it. The problem is a dire shortage of hunting opportunities near the population centers, especially near Lexington. A lot of potential hunters get discouraged, and just don't keep buying licenses.
The property I currently hunt is very small, but because of its habitat mix, it's very attractive to deer. The landowner is constantly pestered by people asking permission to hunt, some of whom offer him crazy lease fees, and by people wanting to buy his land for hunting purposes, even though it's only 18 acres!! One of the neighboring landowners is wealthy, and has repeatedly offered him twice what he paid for the property only 4 years ago, just to add it to his land so he could use it for 2 weeks out of the year. That same scenario is played out regularly all over this part of the state, and I don't see that trend slowing down in my lifetime.
Edited to add: I think that nonresident hunters are actually increasing in our state; Kentucky is now the trendy spot to pursue a B&C buck. What happened to Kansas a few years back is what's happening here now.
I am hunting in KY for the first time this year. I have relatives that own 450 acres that border the Mississippi River. Rifle season just ended. $150 for non resident license, $ 185 for deer permit. Only allowed one buck, and biggest thing I saw so far was a decent 8pt, but I ain't taking any culls until the end of Dec muzzle loader season.In Kentucky, even resident fees have gone up. I buy a sportsman's license every year; this year it was $95, and I've bagged one deer, nothing else all year. For many years I bought one, and ended up with no place to fish or hunt. Next year (although not early enough in the year to be practical), I'll be eligible for a senior license, and I plan to take advantage of that....$12. We also have a resident senior lifetime sportsman's license, which is $180; I doubt I'd live long enough, or be spry enough for all those years, to make that one worthwhile.
If you want an example of non-resident fees that are truly worth complaining about, look at the Canadian provinces. Most of them gouge American hunters outrageously with their fees.
As for hunter numbers dropping, I believe that in my state, at least, there is no shortage of hunters, or potential hunters, even though license sales are indeed down. Desire to hunt among the populace is as great as I've ever seen it. The problem is a dire shortage of hunting opportunities near the population centers, especially near Lexington. A lot of potential hunters get discouraged, and just don't keep buying licenses.
The property I currently hunt is very small, but because of its habitat mix, it's very attractive to deer. The landowner is constantly pestered by people asking permission to hunt, some of whom offer him crazy lease fees, and by people wanting to buy his land for hunting purposes, even though it's only 18 acres!! One of the neighboring landowners is wealthy, and has repeatedly offered him twice what he paid for the property only 4 years ago, just to add it to his land so he could use it for 2 weeks out of the year. That same scenario is played out regularly all over this part of the state, and I don't see that trend slowing down in my lifetime.
Edited to add: I think that nonresident hunters are actually increasing in our state; Kentucky is now the trendy spot to pursue a B&C buck. What happened to Kansas a few years back is what's happening here now.
I was just looking at the list of KY B&C bucks by county. Most of them came from counties with moderate-to-low deer numbers (and not counties that out-of-state trophy hunters would generally think to hunt); none from that part of the state.I am hunting in KY for the first time this year. I have relatives that own 450 acres that border the Mississippi River. Rifle season just ended. $150 for non resident license, $ 185 for deer permit. Only allowed one buck, and biggest thing I saw so far was a decent 8pt, but I ain't taking any culls until the end of Dec muzzle loader season.
Yes, and "lottery" is the right word. A very difficult draw.As I recall, KY also has an elk hunting season, by lottery. Out of state bull permit, if drawn, is $550 in addition to other out of state licensing fees.
The state touts it by saying it’s the biggest elk herd east of the Rockies.
In spite of owning farmland there, we are non-residents for Iowa and the tag for deer hunting is almost $600I never really thought about it. I buy my Resident Sportsman's License every year for Fishing, Small Game, and Gun Deer. $60.00, hardly painful. I was talking to a Game Warden and I remarked I hadn't encountered many out of state Hunter's in the last couple of years. He told me your basic Non-Resident Buck only license was a cool $200.00 and processing a Deer if you don't do it yourself could add another $300.00 to that plus lodgings, food, and travel expenses. He said the non-resident license sales had dropped by almost half what they were 10 years ago. It just costs too much. I hunt on my own land so I don't encounter other Hunter's much, but I used to see a lot of out of state cars at Grocery stores and Bar/Restaurants. Not any more.