So I've been reading a lot on this great forum and have learned a ton, so thank you for that! However, my question; I'm reloading .45 ACP for a Ruger 1911 and my normal loads (185gn Rainier FP (plated), 4.5gn WST, OAL = 1.205) work great in the Ruger. However, I recently purchased a Glock G30 Gen 4, and this load would not cycle the action; lots of stovepipes and unejected cases.
Fired off 250 rounds of factory ammo, thinking in might be new springs needed some recoiltherapy - every round fired and cycled great (so it's not an issue with the Glock). After several attempts at determining barrel specific OAL and various WST loads, I gave up on WST and went with Ramshot Silhouette (not because I think WST is bad).
So, to my question (finally): Through much experimentation (including the Plunk Test and determining barrel specific OAL) I have landed on the following two loads (both function well in the the Glock and the Ruger):
1. 185gn Rainier FP (Plated), 8.4gn SILH, OAL = 1.240 (barrel specific)
2. 185gn Rainier FP (Plated), 8.2gn SILH, OAL = 1.195 (Ramshot Load Data)
So, based on what I think I understand, both loads, from a pressure standpoint are probably close to the same given the difference on OAL's (shorter OAL = higher pressure with less powder)?
I prefer to stay within the published Ramshot data, but wanted to insure that my understanding is in line....thoughts?
-=Den
:banghead:
Fired off 250 rounds of factory ammo, thinking in might be new springs needed some recoiltherapy - every round fired and cycled great (so it's not an issue with the Glock). After several attempts at determining barrel specific OAL and various WST loads, I gave up on WST and went with Ramshot Silhouette (not because I think WST is bad).
So, to my question (finally): Through much experimentation (including the Plunk Test and determining barrel specific OAL) I have landed on the following two loads (both function well in the the Glock and the Ruger):
1. 185gn Rainier FP (Plated), 8.4gn SILH, OAL = 1.240 (barrel specific)
2. 185gn Rainier FP (Plated), 8.2gn SILH, OAL = 1.195 (Ramshot Load Data)
So, based on what I think I understand, both loads, from a pressure standpoint are probably close to the same given the difference on OAL's (shorter OAL = higher pressure with less powder)?
I prefer to stay within the published Ramshot data, but wanted to insure that my understanding is in line....thoughts?
-=Den
:banghead: