AlexanderA has it right on. Heller contained language that was a poison pill, although this is not acknowledged by Scalia fans. It is said (who knows) that Scalia and Thomas planned to revisit the issues but were thwarted. They published outraged dissents which were worth spit as far as practical measures. Stevens has specifically said he that he influenced Kennedy to get this bad analysis into Heller.
I'm willing to bet the Court doesn't take up a case quickly or not at all. Will the 5 justices go against Roberts when they may want his vote on other social issues. RKBA is NOT a priority for the Court or the major GOP elite. They just use for send a check messaging.
Now, periodically, someone says "Not infringed". Well, Frank has analyzed for us how BOR rights are not absolute despite a layperson's view of the language. Certainly, Scalia acknowledged the RKBA had limitations. So that phrase is good for a beer after a match and that's about it when it comes to practical matters.
I'm willing to bet the Court doesn't take up a case quickly or not at all. Will the 5 justices go against Roberts when they may want his vote on other social issues. RKBA is NOT a priority for the Court or the major GOP elite. They just use for send a check messaging.
Now, periodically, someone says "Not infringed". Well, Frank has analyzed for us how BOR rights are not absolute despite a layperson's view of the language. Certainly, Scalia acknowledged the RKBA had limitations. So that phrase is good for a beer after a match and that's about it when it comes to practical matters.