• You are using the old High Contrast theme. We have installed a new dark theme for you, called UI.X. This will work better with the new upgrade of our software. You can select it at the bottom of any page.

powder conversions

Status
Not open for further replies.

coyote315

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2012
Messages
166
Never got the accuracy out of Varget I hoped for in my .280 rem, but I blame it on the compatible bullets for my 7400. It seems to love 150gr range and not like anything else, not even a little bit, for accuracy.
Well, I couldn't find IMR 3031 but I have 8 lbs of benchmark and I'm pretty happy w/ it in everything else. Since they're close on the burn chart, I'm going to 'speriment. Now according to my math:
in 30-06, starting load for a 150gr bullet w/ IMR3031 is 43 grains and with b'mark it's 45 grains +/-depending on the bullet profile.
SO, that means benchmark is by-volume of powder less pressure than the 3031.
Acknowledging that the slightly smaller 7mm bore of the .280 will produce higher pressure, I think if I start working up the benchmark at 40 grains (better safe than sorry- worst it can do is not cycle the girl) then, I might be able to find a load that works.
The idea of benchmark's all-temp accuracy appeals to me because deer season is cool, hog "season" is warm, and coyotes season is crazy.
 
I am thinking a powder in the burn range of IMR-4350, H-4831, would be better in the 280 than the faster powders. This is certainly the case for the 270 Win which is very similar. Both were based on the 30-06 case. The bullets, 270 at .277 and the 280 at .284, a mere .007 diff in diameter.
 
Man, I don't know what to suggest about changing powders if you can't find a tested load. I looked on Hodgdon's Site, no mention of Benchmark for this cartridge.

I did find This!

Others too say, use a slower powder.
 
hey that's a good link: I might load up one ladder for S&G's, but I won't hope for too much.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top