PPK or Sig 232

[JCF]

Sig

Sig for me... hands down. Faster target reaquisition, better reliability, less muzzle rise, less recoil, and more accurate. My only complaint is the awkward (to me) decocking lever.

 

[HorseSoldier]

Both are good, but I'd prefer the P-232.

 

[The Real Hawkeye]

Of the two, the Sig's better. I used to have the old P230, which is almost identical to the one you mention. That said, you should get a kahr P9. Lighter than either of those two. No larger dimensionally. Shoots the 9mm, which is much more potent than the .380. If the Sig were a single action with a 1911 style safety, I'd have to have one, though.

 

[osteodoc08]

Wife has a stainless P-230, the foreruner to the P232. It has been a great gun with minimal problems. The only problem we've had, I attribute to bum ammo. It has gone bang the last 1K rounds or so. Action is slick as goose, well you get the idea. It is also very accurate.

 

[Tom Servo]

...then, of course, there's the Makarov to consider.

Better caliber, built like a tank and cheap if you know where to look.

Not as purty as the Sig or the Walther, but it's got a better trigger than the PPK.