Bill_Rights
Member
Question on cartridge design/function: (please forgive this slight diversion from the facts of the case.)
Is a rifle primer supposed to be so tightly seated in the base of the brass that the primer will remain in place during the explosion of the powder, even if the primer is NOT supported by the bolt face?
I ask this because I had some primer blow-out events while shooting recently. The rifle was a Ruger Mini-30 Catalog Number: M-30/20GBCPC | Model Number: 5854 | Caliber: 7.62 x 39mm, which is the police/tactical model with barrel length 16.12".
The ammunition was Prvi Partisan 7.62 x 39mm 123 gr. RNSP (round-nose soft-point) with brass cases and boxer primers. Here are photos of some cases with blown and not-blown primers, plus a couple of unfired cartridges. I would say that about 1 out of every 4-5 shots blew a primer.
When a primer would blow, the semi-auto action cycled OK, except a few times a loose blown primer prevented the bolt from closing on the next round.
This is PPU brass, and the origin of the primer is unknown/unmarked (to me). On the headstamp you can see "ППУ" which is Serbian Cyrillic for "PPU".
MY QUESTIONS:
1) Is this just brass with mis-manufactured primer cup or just mis-manufactured primers that don't seat tightly enough?
2) Could it be that the semi-auto action is not closing fully, so the bolt face is not backing the cartridge base when the powder goes off?
3) Could it be that the semi-auto action is starting the eject stroke too soon, so the bolt face is withdrawing and not backing the cartridge base while the chamber pressure is still too high?
In possible support of choice #2, the rifle is fairly new, only about 100 rounds through it; so maybe the action is sticky and the bolt not seating fully every time?
In possible support of choice #3, this particular ammo has the sharpest initial recoil (initial jerk) of any 7.62 x 39mm 123 gr. I have shot, both in this rifle and the same ammo compared to other ammo in other rifles. I think this loading has a fast-burning powder (which should be good for a 16" barrel, right?). But by the same token, the gas-driven cycling of the semi-auto action might have too high a pressure too soon, thereby starting the bolt withdrawal and ejection too soon.
What're your thoughts?
Is a rifle primer supposed to be so tightly seated in the base of the brass that the primer will remain in place during the explosion of the powder, even if the primer is NOT supported by the bolt face?
I ask this because I had some primer blow-out events while shooting recently. The rifle was a Ruger Mini-30 Catalog Number: M-30/20GBCPC | Model Number: 5854 | Caliber: 7.62 x 39mm, which is the police/tactical model with barrel length 16.12".
The ammunition was Prvi Partisan 7.62 x 39mm 123 gr. RNSP (round-nose soft-point) with brass cases and boxer primers. Here are photos of some cases with blown and not-blown primers, plus a couple of unfired cartridges. I would say that about 1 out of every 4-5 shots blew a primer.
When a primer would blow, the semi-auto action cycled OK, except a few times a loose blown primer prevented the bolt from closing on the next round.
This is PPU brass, and the origin of the primer is unknown/unmarked (to me). On the headstamp you can see "ППУ" which is Serbian Cyrillic for "PPU".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serbian_Cyrillic_alphabet
Pe (П п) Cyrillic letter Pe was derived from the from the Greek letter Pi (Π π) and related to Latin letter P
U (У у) is a letter of the Cyrillic script, related to Greek letter Upsilon and Latin letter U
So this head stamp means "PPU" in Latin/English, which is the acronym for PRVI PARTIZAN UZICE Serbia
MY QUESTIONS:
1) Is this just brass with mis-manufactured primer cup or just mis-manufactured primers that don't seat tightly enough?
2) Could it be that the semi-auto action is not closing fully, so the bolt face is not backing the cartridge base when the powder goes off?
3) Could it be that the semi-auto action is starting the eject stroke too soon, so the bolt face is withdrawing and not backing the cartridge base while the chamber pressure is still too high?
In possible support of choice #2, the rifle is fairly new, only about 100 rounds through it; so maybe the action is sticky and the bolt not seating fully every time?
In possible support of choice #3, this particular ammo has the sharpest initial recoil (initial jerk) of any 7.62 x 39mm 123 gr. I have shot, both in this rifle and the same ammo compared to other ammo in other rifles. I think this loading has a fast-burning powder (which should be good for a 16" barrel, right?). But by the same token, the gas-driven cycling of the semi-auto action might have too high a pressure too soon, thereby starting the bolt withdrawal and ejection too soon.
What're your thoughts?