Drizzt
Member
The Associated Press State & Local Wire
January 21, 2003, Tuesday, BC cycle
8:40 AM Eastern Time
SECTION: State and Regional
LENGTH: 320 words
HEADLINE: Proposal would allow Larimer County employees to pack heat on the job
DATELINE: FORT COLLINS, Colo.
BODY:
Larimer County workers would be allowed to carry guns on the job under a proposal being considered by commissioners.
An employee brandishing a gun in a break room and another dropping one in a stairwell prompted the proposal. The three-member Larimer County Board of Commissioners may vote on the personnel policy when it comes before them Jan. 28, according to county manager Frank Lancaster.
Officials say the policy mostly codifies pre-existing but unwritten regulations. If the Larimer County sheriff issues a concealed-handgun permit to a county employee, the proposal would allow the employee to bring a gun to work.
Commissioner and Loveland resident Glenn Gibson said Monday that his mind still wasn't made up.
"Guns at home, Second Amendment right, 100 percent," Gibson said. "Guns at work, and making your constituents, customers and citizens comfortable, that may be something else."
Eleanor Dwight opposes the proposal.
"You can't get into Coors Field with a bottle of pop," said Dwight, spokeswoman for the Larimer County Million Mom March, which, she said, advocates "sensible" gun laws. "But if you have a concealed weapon (in Larimer County) it's O.K."
The county has no policy on whether employees can carry concealed weapons, according to officials. So the assumption has been that it's OK.
The proposed "Workplace Violence Prevention Policy" confirms that right, but does require employees to notify their supervisor, Lancaster said. Also, if someone is reckless with a gun, they may lose their privileges.
That may apply to the two people who sparked the current policy debate, although one no longer works for the county for unrelated reasons, Lancaster said.
No one was hurt in the mishaps, but Human Services Department employees complained. The head of Human Services decided to prohibit weapons in the department but then realized that no overall policy existed.
January 21, 2003, Tuesday, BC cycle
8:40 AM Eastern Time
SECTION: State and Regional
LENGTH: 320 words
HEADLINE: Proposal would allow Larimer County employees to pack heat on the job
DATELINE: FORT COLLINS, Colo.
BODY:
Larimer County workers would be allowed to carry guns on the job under a proposal being considered by commissioners.
An employee brandishing a gun in a break room and another dropping one in a stairwell prompted the proposal. The three-member Larimer County Board of Commissioners may vote on the personnel policy when it comes before them Jan. 28, according to county manager Frank Lancaster.
Officials say the policy mostly codifies pre-existing but unwritten regulations. If the Larimer County sheriff issues a concealed-handgun permit to a county employee, the proposal would allow the employee to bring a gun to work.
Commissioner and Loveland resident Glenn Gibson said Monday that his mind still wasn't made up.
"Guns at home, Second Amendment right, 100 percent," Gibson said. "Guns at work, and making your constituents, customers and citizens comfortable, that may be something else."
Eleanor Dwight opposes the proposal.
"You can't get into Coors Field with a bottle of pop," said Dwight, spokeswoman for the Larimer County Million Mom March, which, she said, advocates "sensible" gun laws. "But if you have a concealed weapon (in Larimer County) it's O.K."
The county has no policy on whether employees can carry concealed weapons, according to officials. So the assumption has been that it's OK.
The proposed "Workplace Violence Prevention Policy" confirms that right, but does require employees to notify their supervisor, Lancaster said. Also, if someone is reckless with a gun, they may lose their privileges.
That may apply to the two people who sparked the current policy debate, although one no longer works for the county for unrelated reasons, Lancaster said.
No one was hurt in the mishaps, but Human Services Department employees complained. The head of Human Services decided to prohibit weapons in the department but then realized that no overall policy existed.