Realistic Possible Chaos-Inducing Event

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Nov 14, 2007
Messages
13,146
Now, WITHOUT GOING INTO (AT ALL) THE MERITS OF WHETHER THE GLOBAL WARMING THING AND HUMAN'S CONTROL OVER SAME, IS REAL OR CONTRIVED,

There was/is a History Channel show running right now which claims, quite unequivocally, that the earth is warming, that the glaciers and sea ice are melting, temperatures are rise at an alarming rate, and we may have reached a tipping point from which there is no return (due to a vicious cycle mechanism resulting from the lack of white ice reflecting the sun's heat back into space lead to more melting, leads to....). Anyhow, if you believe the claims of the scientists and the producers of the show (presented as fact) - remember, we are assuming for purposes of this thread that the scientists are right - we are not debating whether they are right or wrong - if we take those claims, what's going to happen sometime within the next 100 years, and quite possibly within just 50 YEARS, is that sea levels are going to rise on the order of 13 to 20 feet globally, which puts about 1/3 of Florida and a lot of other coastal areas, particularly big chunks of large cities like NYC area, under water, and - AND - the warming will also produce unprecedented Hurricanes which will create storm surges reaching much deeper inland, greatly exacerbating the problem when those storms hit large cities. Basically, we *ARE* in for a Katrina x10 in the next 50-100 years, possibly Katrina times 10 pretty much every few years. If we are not able to affect the climate in the other direction, either through control of CO2 emissions or other measures. Again, taking their claims at face value.

Well, the ocean level rise will take place gradually, allowing for govermnents and people and charities to slowly re-locate the refugees in other cities and towns upland and find homes for everyone.

But the huge Katrina-like events are the really worrisome parts, not only for the cities/areas hit themselves, but also for those in nearby high ground areas who will see the influx of refugees. Now, Katrina refugees did not cause any problems, by and large, because they were spread out over such a large area into the vastness of TX, OK, AR, MS, TN, and the rest of the south and elsewhere. But in New England and other places along the east coast, there are very few places for the refugees to go, particularly when there is disaster after disaster, as is foretold, taxing the ability and resources of FEMA and the infrastructure and economies of the areas accepting refugees. New England is already pretty packed, and I dare say most landowners won't accept squatters. The situation could very well turn ugly, with people looking for, and appropriating as they may be able, food, water, land, and infrastructure, and greatly magnify the need for serious planning and weapons both in those coastal areas themselves, and in the likely refugee-destination areas.

Thoughts on how to prepare for this? Again, we're *assuming* that this stuff will happen for purposes of this thread, so don't debate that issue. Anyone gonna move from a coastal area like south Florida to some other place? Land is gonna become that much more valuable - going towards a Waterworld scenario like that. There will be dams and dykes built, as in Holland, but they will only be able to do so much.
 
I appreciate this question, because to me, it poses a reasonable disaster scenario that should cause everyone to plan very soberly. There are all sorts of predictions of what will happen in the next 30-50 years in the US and the world at large, be it climate change, peak oil / Olduvai Theory, etc. (when one considers that oil doesn't have to run out - gas just has to hit $10-15 a gallon, which many predict will happen in the next few years or so - for the US economy to crawl to a halt, it is quite plausible to consider that the American way of life may come to an end in our lifetimes).

Of course I hope I'm wrong, I hope none of this ever pans out... but fortune favors the prepared, so I take this very seriously.

I think there are alot of important considerations regarding this issue, many of which are absolutely critical - such as being close to people you trust / can rely on one another, such as family; having land and a safe / strong place; being able to hunt / gather / farm your own food indefinately; having a reliable, safe water supply, etc. - these do not fall within the scope of this question, so I'll not comment on them here.

Regarding weapons, I firmly believe that possessing appropriate firearms is going to be critical if social order breaks down due to any sort of long-term crisis, such as climate change, peak oil induced depression, etc. I have one handgun in each of the major American autoloading calibers, 9mm, 40S&W and 45ACP (soon to add .357 Mag to the mix to round things out pretty well) as well as .22LR. I've got a 12ga Pump shotgun, a 20" AR in .223 and a .22LR bolt rifle.

I like having a variety of weapons in popular calibers - I think it will make ammunition commonality / tradability easier than if I was shooting an obscure or expensive caliber.

I would like to add a bolt gun in .308 and a 16" AR in 5.56mm to the collection to really round out the choices I have for long-term reliance and survivability.

Overall, I think having a good rifle - like an AR - is absolutely critical. it allows someone to hunt small - medium size game as well as provide an extraordinary level of defense. The common .223 / 5.56mm round is probably one of the most plentiful rifle rounds in the nation, behind .22LR, which I think might be the most important weapon in my gun cabinet long-term.

The .22 bolt gun, a Savage MkIIf, only cost me $114, but it will probably last forever (if I maintain it properly, which I always do), doesn't malfunction since it's a bolt gun, and I can buy 10,000 rounds for less than $250 (and carry alot of those at once, too). Although probably not very useful for defense, a gun like that would allow someone in the woods to survive off the wildlife very effectively and efficiently.

I know plenty of people are going to have different views on this, so this is just my take on everything.

The good part is that, if I'm wrong and will never need to rely on any of my guns for survival / defense in a disaster scenario, at least I get to have lots of fun shooting them in the meanwhile!:D
 

Attachments

  • 100_2053.jpg
    100_2053.jpg
    570.7 KB · Views: 38
PS,

I'm afraid 'earth changes' are beyond the relatively narrow scope of S&T- try it over at APS...

lpl/nc
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top