My family's due to be CCW-approved any day now, and since Christmas is almost right around the corner, we've been thinking that a .22LR autoloader, a Ruger Mark II/III would be a nice "communal" gift. Since it'll be our first pistol, and its *probably* only going to get used at the range or on our property, a .22LR seems ideal since it's so cheap to shoot and easy to handle, and a Ruger autoloader also seems fitting since they've such a good reputation and handling characteristics (we've shot a few before and have had nothing but good experiences.)
Now, my question - aside from the loaded chamber indicator on the Mark III (I've heard about the unintentional discharge problem - what's Ruger done about this?), what's the difference between it and the Mark II? The 5.5" stainless bull versions appear to be identical, except for the prices. I've heard something about different magazine releases and safeties, but haven't been able to really verify any of it (I've only handled a Mark II before), does anyone know? Which would you recommend for us first time pistol owners?
Thanks a lot.
Now, my question - aside from the loaded chamber indicator on the Mark III (I've heard about the unintentional discharge problem - what's Ruger done about this?), what's the difference between it and the Mark II? The 5.5" stainless bull versions appear to be identical, except for the prices. I've heard something about different magazine releases and safeties, but haven't been able to really verify any of it (I've only handled a Mark II before), does anyone know? Which would you recommend for us first time pistol owners?
Thanks a lot.