Ruger Redhawk .45acp/.45 colt

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jul 9, 2009
Messages
2,538
Location
Luling Texas
I got a couple 1911s one being the Ruger SR1911 with 5" barrel, also got couple .45 colt revolvers I load with Plus P ammo for hogs and love it, I am considering the new Ruger Redhawk convertible in .45 acp/.45 colt, it comes in a 4.2" barrel. What are the ballistic comparisons between a .45 acp in a auto configuration as opposed to a .45 acp revolver? Just wondering if it is worth the money to try one.
 
The differences between .45 ACP in a revolver and in an automatic are small -- you'd probably have to fire quite a collection of guns before you had a statistically significant sample to tell if any observed differences were due to the design of the gun, as opposed to sample to sample variation,
 
The biggest difference, to me, is that a self loader tends to fling brass around. A revolver dumps it neatly at my feet.

I have 4 double action revolvers chambered for the 45 ACP cartridge. All of them are S&W. Accurate, dependable and easily carried. Not a fan of Ruger.

Kevin
 
The biggest difference, to me, is that a self loader tends to fling brass around. A revolver dumps it neatly at my feet.
Perfectly true -- which is why I practice with my M1911s in a controlled environment, preferably an indoor range. But when on horseback or hiking, I take my Colt New Service in .45 Colt.
 
I am considering the new Ruger Redhawk convertible in .45 acp/.45 colt, it comes in a 4.2" barrel.

I don't believe that gun is a "convertible" in the sense it's uses the same cylinder for both cartridges.
 
A Ruger RedHawk or SRH dedicated to 45acp would be the bomb.
Shorten the cylinder so there isn't that gap with no rifling and nice tight throat and forcing cone.
 
huntsman said:
I don't believe that gun is a "convertible" in the sense it's uses the same cylinder for both cartridges.

Correct. This model uses moon clips for .45 Auto (.45 ACP). I have the .45 Colt version of this revolver and it's excellent. I also have a pair of Blackhawks that are .45 Colt/.45 Auto convertibles with a cylinder for each ... also excellent.
 
Correct. This model uses moon clips for .45 Auto (.45 ACP). I have the .45 Colt version of this revolver and it's excellent. I also have a pair of Blackhawks that are .45 Colt/.45 Auto convertibles with a cylinder for each ... also excellent.
I wonder if Ruger could retrofit your revolver with the new cylinder? If not, and you want the capability to fire ACP, there are a couple of gunsmith that offer the service.

Kevin
 
The one I saw had a rounded butt. Not sure if that might make it hard to find replacement grips or not. I'm also not sure I'd want that on a gun as front-heavy as a Redhawk.
 
If I could get a deal on a Ruger Redhawk .45 LC in 4" then I'd send it off to a gunsmith to get it cut for moonclips. The few folks who have done this and talked about it on the internet have reported happy results.
 
Mine has never misfired, I couldn't be happier. Well yes I guess maybe I could. Ruger needs to make a 4inch 454 with this conversion, as I am not fond of the Super Redhawk.

I emailed Ruger and called them about this idea almost 6 months ago. With nothing on the horizon I decided to do my own on the 454 Alaskan, which I have rebranded the 454 Alaskan Triple Threat. The documented conversion can be seen here http://www.dayattherange.com/?p=4551

It is more than a Triple Threat, capable of firing all of the ammunition below. But you have to admit Tripe Threat as a certain ring to it.
45ACP
45S&W Schofield
45Colt
45WinMag
454Casull
 
In addition to the revolvers listed above I also have an Alaskan in .454 Casull but have no interest in having it modified to shoot .45 ACP. The .454 Casull and. 45 Colt options do everything I need, and do it better than the .45 ACP.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top