It's pretty common for people to keep handguns in quick-access safes, especially when the homeowner is not around, in urban areas here. Personally, I think that keeping a burglar from having easy access to my loaded pistol is as important a part of personal security as my having access to it. Frankly, this law, while I find it obnoxious, merely mandates what is common practice anyway.
The law about gun shows on City/County property will do nothing but take revenue from the City/County. SF City/County are equivalent, and they cover a very small land area, a bit under 7 miles square. There could be gun shows, on neighboring cities' property, walking distance from nearly anywhere in San Francisco. This is a ridiculous law, but would have essentially zero impact on the availability of firearms and ammunition to either law-abiding citizens, or to criminals. It's a self-defeating peacenik hippie decision, like chasing the Battleship Iowa Museum out of the city because it made people think about war. Stockton was very happy to take the ship, and the tourism revenue it generates.
The law about gun inventories is a PITA for the gun shop, but in theory they take an inventory anyway.
I don't like these laws. However, compared to DC, and compared to SF's invalidated total handgun ban, they're a joke. A silly joke, by looney left politicians who have to show their hippie constituents that they're "doing something about violence."
If you really think about it, it's a victory for us when they're reduced to doing things like this in the name of "gun control." You have to understand SF to fully grasp that. Well, nobody
understands SF, because it makes no sense. But you have to be familiar with it, I guess.
