SC Domestic Violence bill struck down

Status
Not open for further replies.

ScottsGT

Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2002
Messages
1,987
Location
Columbia, SC
Two weeks back I got an E-mail from SC Grass Roots about a Domestic Bill that they wanted struck down due to the anti gun legislation written into it. Well, yesterday it was struck down.
http://www.thestate.com/mld/thestate/11447768.htm
Posted on Thu, Apr. 21, 2005





Domestic violence bill to be revived

Leaders promise action in wake of controversy over lawmakers’ banter

By JENNIFER TALHELM and JEFF STENSLAND

Staff Writers


S.C. House leaders on Wednesday vowed to pass a bill strengthening the state’s criminal domestic violence laws by the end of the session.

The pledge came a day after WIS-TV reported that a House panel had killed one bill increasing penalties for domestic violence — while passing another making cockfighting a felony.

It also followed what critics called insulting comments about domestic violence victims made during the committee’s discussion of the legislation.

The controversy exploded after the WIS report, in which Rep. John Graham Altman questioned why battered women return to their abusers.

“The woman ought to not be around the man,†the Charleston Republican said. “I mean, you women want it one way and not another.â€

Efforts by The State to reach Altman for comment Wednesday were unsuccessful.

House Speaker David Wilkins, R-Greenville, and Judiciary Committee chairman Jim Harrison said they had talked about reintroducing a bill before the tidal wave of publicity following the WIS report.

“Criminal domestic violence is a critical issue and is something that should not be tolerated,†Wilkins said.

However, the report prompted Wilkins to send out a news release saying, “Criminal domestic violence and animal cruelty are both critical issues that this body takes very seriously.â€

The Judiciary Committee on Monday tabled the domestic violence bill because it had several flaws that members objected to, said Harrison, R-Richland.

Wilkins said he and House staffers would clean up the bill and introduce a new version as early as next week.

Victims’ advocates, who had been dismayed by the committee’s actions, were thrilled at Wilkins’ news.

“The process has been very difficult and, in my opinion, very inappropriate, around this bill,†said Vicki Bourus, executive director of the S.C. Coalition Against Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault.

In recent years, South Carolina has either led the nation or ranked in the top six in the rate of women killed by men.

The bill, sponsored by Rep. Gilda Cobb-Hunter, D-Orangeburg, would have increased the penalties for domestic violence offenders and required judges to complete annual training in domestic violence issues.

Advocates said they had offered amendments to remove sections that committee members had objected to, such as one that expanded the definition of “physical cruelty,†a grounds for divorce.

But the amendments never got introduced. Instead, advocates said, committee members joked about the title of the bill and then tabled it with little discussion.

According to a tape of the meeting obtained by The State newspaper, Altman asked why the bill’s title — “Protect Our Women in Every Relationship (POWER)†— just mentioned protecting women. Harrison suggested making the bill the “Protecting Our People in Every Relationship†Act, or “POPER.â€

A voice on the tape can be heard pronouncing it “Pop her.†Another voice then says, “Pop her again,†followed by laughter.

Cobb-Hunter and victims advocates didn’t think it was funny.

“And they wonder why we rank in the bottom on women in office and we lead in women getting killed by men,†she said.

Harrison said critics were “overreacting†and the comments weren’t intended to diminish the gravity of domestic violence. “If you take it that way, you’re overly sensitive,†he said.

WIS’ coverage became the subject of radio talk shows and State House chatter.

At one point during the report, Altman tells reporter Kara Gormley she is “not very bright†for questioning the committee’s actions.

Lawmakers who were in the room when Gormley interviewed Altman said the WIS report didn’t tell the whole story.

House Majority Leader Jim Merrill, R-Charleston, said Altman gave a detailed explanation about the bill’s faults during the TV interview, but that portion wasn’t aired.

WIS news director Tina Blacklocke defended the piece but declined to let The State see the raw footage.

Cobb-Hunter said she doesn’t blame only Altman for killing the bill; any House member at the meeting could have saved it.

“The committee is made up of Democrats and Republicans, black and white, male and female. As far as I’m concerned, it’s a pox on all their houses.â€

Staff writer Rick Brundrett contributed to this report. Reach Talhelm at (803) 771-8339 or [email protected].


But here's the funny part! An interview with a TV reporter and a Senator:
Posted on Thu, Apr. 21, 2005





WHAT HE SAID


Excerpts from the exchange between WIS-TV reporter Kara Gormley and Rep. John Graham Altman, R-Charleston, over a S.C. House committee’s vote to make cockfighting a felony while tabling a bill that would toughen criminal domestic violence laws

Gormley: “Does that show that we are valuing a gamecock’s life over a woman’s life?â€

Altman: “You’re really not very bright, and I realize you are not accustomed to this, but I’m accustomed to reporters having a better sense of depth of things, and your asking this question to me would indicate you can’t understand the answer. To ask the question is to demonstrate an enormous amount of ignorance. I’m not trying to be rude or hostile, I’m telling you.â€

Gormle “It’s rude when you tell someone they are not very bright.â€

Altman: “You’re not very bright, and you’ll just have to live with that.â€

SOURCE: wistv.com

Trust me, Gormley is NOT very bright!! :D
 
I've never read the current domistic violence law in SC, but I work in a SC ER. Based on what I've seen, y'all need to look at how it's being enforced. I've seen domestic violence cases where both parities were brought in by the police. During treatment, it became obvious that the male was assaulted by the female and the female's injuries were a result of the male's self-defense. On reporting this to the arresting officer there was no interest. The response was that the judge could sort it out.

I wonder how many SC men have lost the right to own firearms due to being assaulted by their wife or girlfriend?

Males being victims of female domestic violence is under reported by a wide margin. Guys don't want to admit that they were injured by a female. You get a lot of accident stories. Sorry, guys, but razor cuts look distinctly different than the cuts from colliding with a window.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top