• You are using the old High Contrast theme. We have installed a new dark theme for you, called UI.X. This will work better with the new upgrade of our software. You can select it at the bottom of any page.

Sharps or spencer?

What to get next

  • Sharps 45-90

    Votes: 19 65.5%
  • Spencer 56-50

    Votes: 6 20.7%
  • other please specify

    Votes: 4 13.8%

  • Total voters
    29
Status
Not open for further replies.

Eric F

Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2007
Messages
2,933
Ok over the past few months I have been looking to buy a sharps.....no wimpy 45-70 either......I was looking at 50-90. But looking at powder bullet and brass prices I was wondering if that was a poor choice. Runner up a new spencer in 56-50. Over all cheaper to shoot brass is about the same but uses way less powder and lead.

What I realy want is some thing no one else has
hunting potential for deer size critters
economical
and something I can load bp for.

So Any one have some thoughts for me thanks

Ok misprint on poll shoutd be 50-90
 
Really this is an "apple or Orange" question. The Sharps is a single shot, the Spencer is a repeater. The Spencer round was originally a rim fire, but modern replicas are center fire. The sharps uses much longer, more powerful cartridges. Both are fun to shoot.
 
Someone makes a new Spencer? My wallet is going to hate me, but who makes them?
 
Armi sport of italy makes them for taylors but buffaloarms.com has the best price. Starline brass is the only source for brass though
right around $1100 for the rifle
 
not too sure for smokeless but bp and bp substitutes would be easy enough fill case to capicity less wad and bullet
there is some smokeless info I found but I do not trust it enough to put the info out here as it sounds really whacked
 
Well, at least I don't have to worry about spending money. If I can't run smokeless (even TrailBoss) through a modern replica cartridge gun, I don't see the sense in spending over $1k.
 
I think trail boss has some load info on their site now that you mention it. I thought it was a bp sub???
 
Hodgdon's Reloading Center doesn't show any .56-50 loads. Also, TrailBoss is simply a high-bulk smokeless.
 
I wouldn't consider the .56-50 for hunting

Spencer was designed as a military weapon and lacks the kind of long range you could expect from the sharps.
 
My mistake there is some thing on reloadersnest but I can not access it from work
 
There's a Spencer board here. A Spencer replica would be very cool (they make one in .44 Russian!) but for hunting I'd go with a Sharps in .45-70; there are lots of good bullets and loads for the .45-70, and the .50-90 would be like lobbing mellons. The Spencer would be equivalent to a pistol caliber carbine.
 
9.2gr Trailboss
1.62" OAL
335gr (modified Lee) bullet
933fps +/- 15fps. (most shots were right at 933-940fps)
Shot point of aim 100% of the time

There's a load I found, and it sounds correct, as well. 335gr lead bullet at 900+FPS will ruin a deer's day, if placed correctly.
 
I've shot a Whitetail deer, an Axis deer, and 2 hogs with my 56-50 Spencer. I admit all were within 100 yds, but that didn't hurt their taste. Brass is $1.00 each, and loaded ammo $2.00 each, so I load my own. The previous Trail Boss load is pretty close to what I use. Would I buy one for hunting, no, the Sharps is a better (cartridge wise) rifle. I use mine for CAS also, in fact that's why I bought it.
 
A while ago back when the wait was 4 years for one I ordered a Shiloh # 1 in .45-100. While waiting I bought a used C-Sharps in 45-70, then bought a guys order from Shiloh and had my .45-100 built to my specs saving about 2 1/2 years of waiting. I kind of forgot about the one I’d ordered, till I got the postcard from Shiloh saying it was about to start production and to send them the $4300 for it. At that time there was no way my wife was going to put up with another 4K plus single shot, so I gave the order to a friend of mine in exchange for my $50 deposit back.

He kept the specs the same #1 Sporter 31" Barrel, except changed the caliber to 50-90 with the intent of making a long-range rifle out of it. The problem was/is to get similar trajectory to a .45 you had to move up to 600-700 grain bullets and at around 1200 FPS it took all the fun out of shooting it. Brass is costly, more than the $1 per I paid for 45 2.6”. It was also way more difficult for him to work up a load, could have been the flinch though. It's amazing to watch him shoot silhouette with it because when hit the animals fly off the rail.

Even with a big .45 effective range is limited due to the trajectory and effects of conditions on the trajectory. I usually end up using 3-4 sighters to get on a pig swinger at 300 meters and that’s at a known distance, with my sight setting for that range. I own a .45-100, .45-90, and a .40-70, for a hunting Sharps I’d buy a .45-70 and never look back.

Chuck
 
I agree with what Chuck R. said...however I would think that the 45-90 would be a neat choice as you could shoot both 45-70 OR 45-90 (much like the 38/357, you would have to watch fouling, plus the rather long "leap" from the throat to the rifle lands)


But as an owner of a 45-70, you can be certain that you will lay low anything on the receiving end of that bad boy...and sometimes lay yourself low as well. :)
 
I vote the Sharps 50-90. I have quigley 45-100 my wife baught for me a couple of years ago. Ilove it , when things are crappy I can go to the range and shoot it and everything is alright. I only say the 50-90 because of the famous Billy Dixon shot at Adobe Wells where he knocked an Indian Medicine man off his horse at 1538 yards. Distance was surveyed by Army mapping engineers.
 
I see Buffalo is offering a 30" .56-50 rifle,(hands wringing).
I have a bunch of SR4759 powder,,,,,,,,,,,,17 grains and a 350 lead flatpoint should about do the trick.

I'm going to call these guys today.
 
Well I decided to go with the sharps this year and the spencer next year. Just ordered reloading supplies for 50-90
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top