I've been using Accurate #9 for about 16 years mostly for .357 Magnum, never noticed any inconsistencies. all of the #9 I used was US made. some of the #5 was from elsewhere mostly Czech. In the last 10 years the Accurate #7 I've used has been from MT USAThis was for 200s IIRC. It should be noted that some believe current production #9 burns faster than it did when that data was published.
A 200 grain bullet in .40 would probably be running under 900 fps, these are over 1000 fps from a 10mm. While it's not loaded to max potential, it's no slouch.Yeah, but that's the whole purpose of 10mm...big bullets driven fast. If you want to shoot 10mm bullets slowly then just get a 40 S&W They're practically giving those away on the used market now.
Just curious where you got that impression. I've seen several videos of people testing Underwood's offerings with Speer GD bullets, where the velocities are up over 1250 fps and faster. Yes, you do get some jacket separation, but it never seems to come totally undone and fall apart. Granted though, gel is gel, and not a living animal.But, when the bullets are the same as .40 and they can't be hot loaded to stand up to the higher velocity of 10mm, it makes me question the validity of the 10mm.
No, just 10mm in general. I'm not a hunter, I don't live in boar and bear territory, so a 10mm isn't jumping out as a better choice than .45 to me, not when there are bullet issues with the hot loads and the weak loads aren't much better than .45 ACP +P.Just curious where you got that impression. I've seen several videos of people testing Underwood's offerings with Speer GD bullets, where the velocities are up over 1250 fps and faster. Yes, you do get some jacket separation, but it never seems to come totally undone and fall apart. Granted though, gel is gel, and not a living animal.
If you ask CraigC, he will share that he has seen GD bullets come apart at 1400 fps and higher. It seems to me that one could push 180 gr GD bullets to 1300 fps out of a 5 or 6" barrel without any real problem and a bit slower with these 200 gr. That is very potent medicine in the right application. Deer, hogs, black bear, jerk asses would all find that pretty lively at the muzzle end.
I'm not saying the Gold Dot is the best bullet to choose for 10mm. Personally I think hard casts and some of the monolithics out there are much better choices, but I don't think bullet integrity invalidates the cartridge.
Did you just mean that you question the validity of 10mm when loaded with GDs?
Yeah, with how popular .40 S&W is, there have been plenty of "cheap" JHP's made by the likes of Magtech, PMC, etc. and if you put them in a 10mm, I can't imagine the results would be good when the velocity is cranked up.I know a couple of hunters that have taken a fair number of pigs and deer with 10mm 180 grain Gold Dot bullets and report being very pleased with their performance.
Pigs and deer aren't people, but that still might teach one something.
Some .40/10 JHP bullets truly fail at 10mm velocities, and some do not. For some, they just expand even quicker and reach similar penetration depths - thus creating more "crush path volume," as well as more temporary disruption if you think that matters.
Curious if you've looked at these bullets from Doubletap. There is a 200 and a 230 gr hard cast option available from them.I'm gonna test the 180's and 200's out of 10mm handguns to see how they do. I'll also check out the velocity difference between a 5" auto and a 5" revolver. That said, the best 'using' bullet in the 10mm is probably the 220gr Rimrock.
Although I have found no reloading data for them, or the 220gr Rimrock for that matter.
That's why I haven't bought any yet. They look like good stuff, but I need to track down some load data.The lack of data over 200gr makes me hesitant