Switched to a revolver for ccw...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Some random thoughts:

1. Personally, a J-snub is not quite “enough gun,” for me. An SP101, however, has just enough more size and heft to be “enough,” for me. I am talking about ergonomics, and shoot-ability, not ammo capacity, in this case. This is just me; I am not trying to convince or convert anyone. (My hands are long, but not wide.)

2. My favorite speed loader, for an SP101, is made of stainless steel, by Ruger. It is a bit heavy, as it weighs just as much, and is as large, as an SP101. ;)

2a. There is not as much “work space” when reloading an SP101, or J-snub, compared to a K/L-Frame or GP100, and a speed loader carrier, on the belt, takes up about as much room as a whole ‘nother SP101 or J-snub, anyway.

2b. For several years, about 2002 to around 2008, my most common carry combo, when not wearing a PD uniform, was a pair of SP101 snub-guns. Sometimes, I added a third SP101, or substituted a Speed Six or GP100 for one of the SP101 snub-guns. Starting about 2008, it tended to be a P229, teamed with an SP101.

3. My aging hands do not like being hurt by compact 9mm pistols. Been there; done that; finito, por favor. I am uninterested in any Glock smaller than a G19x or G17, which are, really, rather big guns.

4. The protruding, blocky, rear portion of a Glock slide is my concealment nemesis, regardless of barrel length. A spurless-less-hammer SP101, Speed Six, or GP100 is amazingly concealable, on my person.

5. The blocky double-column-width Glock slide, inside my trousers, is my comfort nemesis. I can accommodate a cylinder, inside my trousers, along with a slim barrel, more easily. That is what works, for me, at six feet tall, wearing trousers with a 34” waistband.

6. Any ammo capacity, be it five or thirty, is enough, until it isn’t. Be ready.

7. I bought my first GP100 about 1990 or 1991, and added several more, over time. With some of the OT money earned, during and after Hurricane Harvey, I bought myself a very slick, sweet Ruger GP100, 3”, with a spurless hammer.

8. I am now retired from LEO-ing. I fired one shot in the line of duty, in almost 34 years of sworn service, all of it patrol, and hit exactly where intended. My 4” GP100 was enough. (Trivia: I carried a Stainless Python, on duty, while waiting for the firearms lab to finish testing my GP100.) I did switch to autos, for duty, in 1997, but, in hindsight, could have saved myself the expense. This does not mean that I advocate a general return to duty revolvers, just that I could have kept using duty revolvers. One of my academy classmates, unless he has retired in the last few months, is still carrying revolvers, on and off the clock.

9. I am, now, OK with six to eight cartridges in the gun, be it auto or revolver. I still like toting more than one, if “going into town,” with that meaning Houston, Texas.

Again, to be clear, I am not trying to convince or convert anyone.
 
I looked over Ruger SP101 line. They do have two very good guns one is .357 with adjustible sights and 4.2 " barrel the other is snub chambered for 9x19. Fine choice if one can get by with five cartridges. The only viable reload is second revolver that is where light alloy frame and Ti cylinder of J-frame really helps.
 
Back in the day a citizen measured across the cylinder of a revolver and the slide of a Glock. Try it.

True, but a cylinder is relatively short, and, round can be more comfortable than blocky. In the case of double-column-mag Glocks, the slide is considerably more bulky than the barrels of most revolvers. One of my nicer OWB SP101 holsters carries the cylinder higher than the belt, for even better concealability.

I do not hate Glocks; I own several, but except for the G42, carrying them comfortably is an OWB-only proposition, which means a longer, more-substantial cover garment is required.
 
True, but a cylinder is relatively short, and, round can be more comfortable than blocky
Point well made. However, I have been carrying a G27 being lectured on how you could not carry a Glock concealed. Don't mistake, I regularly shoot revolvers. The down side of these guns have 6" barrels with three exceptions-a " K frame and two N frames.. One of my mentors was a slight guy who would conceal a 6" Model 28 Smith carried Mexican style.

My G23 can be concealed but full sized Glock it's out of the question. I have two handguns for carrying where appropriate. One is a Model 29 4" and the other is a Model 28 4".
 
Steel N-frame. That is Perry or fishing wader suspender proposition for sure unless one uses a chest holster. Not a bad idea for TN from close range a ma Euroasian boar with piglets is almost as dangerous as Griz on a meal.
 
Last edited:
True, but a cylinder is relatively short, and, round can be more comfortable than blocky. In the case of double-column-mag Glocks, the slide is considerably more bulky than the barrels of most revolvers. One of my nicer OWB SP101 holsters carries the cylinder higher than the belt, for even better concealability.

I do not hate Glocks; I own several, but except for the G42, carrying them comfortably is an OWB-only proposition, which means a longer, more-substantial cover garment is required.

Yeah, the rear corner of the Glock slide is the part that prints most for me, next is the squared off rear corner of the grip.

I find the 1911 easier to conceal with the same realitive size, especially with the officer frame or a bobtail.

Aluminum frame either CCO or bobtail grip in 9mm or .38 super is a very easy to carry and shoot (just as if not more important to me) option.

Then again I can carry a Glock 19 or 17 with very little extra work
 
SP101 in 2 inch 357 for me . reliability ,plenty of power, enough weight to be able to maintain control and ability to shoot 38 specials . Whats not to like ? I carry it loaded with 38 lswchp 158 grn +P. The good old FBI load.And as an added benefit Ammo can be found every where ,from the big box stores to the smallest mom and pop general store in unheard of places.
 
True, but a cylinder is relatively short, and, round can be more comfortable than blocky. In the case of double-column-mag Glocks, the slide is considerably more bulky than the barrels of most revolvers.

Wonder if needed to make sure we were comparing Glock subcompacts to the revolvers spoken of here. Sure enough if we are using a full size Glock it won't work. I never found a G26 or G27 uncomfortable. My favorite was the G29. If you carry, carry a cannon.
 
I was kicking around this revolvers or auto for personal carry around. Have we really made much progress since the pocket hammerless Colt Model 1908?

Yes, the ammo quality is head & shoulders above what it used to be. That is why today pistols as reliable as revolvers.
 
I also switched from a Glock to a snub. Ultimately the deciding factor was that revolvers were much easier to conceal and that all of the advantages of semi-auto handguns—quicker reloads, higher capacity, etc.—are extremely unlikely to matter in a self-defense shooting. Might as well go with the more comfortable and aesthetic option and get the advantage of being able to make contact shots. I'm a better shot at a distance with auto-loaders but once you get more than 15 yards away you're better off using Run Fu than trying to shoot it out over something (or someone) that's probably covered by insurance anyway.
 
Last edited:
I almost always carry a compact 45 acp (a 10+1 Springfield XD) strongside IWB. I occasionally carry a J-frame in a pocket.

There has been a lot written in this thread about the numbers of rounds and distances to target likely to be required in a defensive encounter. Clearly, we can't accurately predict how many rounds we might have to fire, or how far those shots will likely be. However, I wanted to do a little more thinking about the ranges of possibilities that I might face. So, I decided to do a little experiment.

I took a series of videos off of the Active Self Protection YouTube channel, and set up those scenarios at the range (using the single or multiple targets, distances to targets, shooter movement, positions of no-shoots, positions and types of cover and concealment, single or two-hand grips possible, numbers of rounds fired by defenders, etc. present in the real event) and then solved those scenarios on the timer. I tried this with my J-frame, with my EDC, and with a full-size XDm in 9mm. I examined times and shot placement for these scenarios with the various guns.

The result of this experiment: I almost always carry a compact 45 acp (a 10+1 Springfield XD) strongside IWB. I occasionally carry a J-frame in a pocket. I don't like to step down to the J-frame, but realize that its better than nothing.

Just my view. YMMV.

But I do believe that this same process is worth doing for everyone who has posted here.
 
Never owned an Airweight. I do have a LCR, but it is more snappy than my Taurus 85 and my 640 pro... All steel jframes are still very light and also dampen recoil, so that's what I prefer. They're usually a few oz lighter than polymer Shields and the like at under 18 or so ozs.
 
Never owned an Airweight. I do have a LCR, but it is more snappy than my Taurus 85 and my 640 pro... All steel jframes are still very light and also dampen recoil, so that's what I prefer. They're usually a few oz lighter than polymer Shields and the like at under 18 or so ozs.

Have J frames and *had* a LCR. The LCR just felt .... weird. As much as I tried to like it, it felt too much like a ball-peen hammer slapping my palm every time I shot it....so down the river she went. Latest toy is an AirLite 340PD. doesn’t feel as bad as the LCR did.
 
Have J frames and *had* a LCR. The LCR just felt .... weird. As much as I tried to like it, it felt too much like a ball-peen hammer slapping my palm every time I shot it....so down the river she went. Latest toy is an AirLite 340PD. doesn’t feel as bad as the LCR did.

Absolutely! The LCR is an unpleasant gun to shoot.

Fun fact:. I like to use mine with light loaded .38 special to prep my hands before launching into sessions with hot loaded Magnums. Makes them seem pleasant in comparison, and my hot loaded 10mm downright light feeling.
 
Those look like they have that other grip profile, I've been told those make it a bit easier to shoot.

Haven't got a chance to try one yet but I'd like to for comparison
 
I went through a number of grips before I bought these. At first, I thought they would be the exact opposite so never bought them. Then read this article below and decided to try them out. For myself, they were a huge difference, easier to handle. I had the stock grip and the Pro Diamond. I think I still have them in my drawer.


http://mousegunaddict.blogspot.com/search?q=lcr+9mm
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top