Synthetic Stocked Rifle That Doesn't Look/Feel Cheap

Status
Not open for further replies.

Olympus

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Messages
4,212
I'm looking for suggestions here. My only synthetic rifles are rimfire currently. I'd like to have a synthetic rifle for deer hunting, in a short action caliber, that isn't 1)very expensive or 2)very cheap. Is there a decent middle ground rifle, somewhere in the $500-$600 range? It just seems like all of the synthetic stock rifles I see these day are all very flimsy and cheap feeling.
 
I have found the rifles with actually good synthetic stocks start in the $800 range. If one of the quality suppliers has one for a Ruger American I would go that route.
 
One other possibility is finding a rifle you like and adding a Magpul Hunter stock if available. That could tack on an extra $225+ and a bit of weight, but if you like the results...

Just adding another option as my only non-cheap feeling synthetics are a T/C Pro Hunter and an HS Precision stocked 700.
 
I'll second the Vanguard S2. Though I did end up replacing the stock on mine, the synthetic stock was one of the better ones I've seen.
 
All of the factory synthetics are injection molded plastic, they are all pretty much the same. Bergara does a better job than most of giving the appearance of quality, but it is still a cheap stock using exactly the same construction. I think Tikka or the older Ruger Hawkeye synthetics are going to be the stiffest, but also think that is over rated. Magpul still uses the same injection molding, they just use more, and thicker plastic. They are fine for a target rifle, not a hunting rifle even they call it a " hunter" stock.

The cheap Ruger American rifles and a few other designs use a completely different bedding method that doesn't require a stiff stock. They can be limp as a noodle and still shoot great as long as there is enough clearance so that the barrel won't contact the forend. In fact all of the cheap plastic stocks shoot better than 99% of shooters. The only real reason to change is for aesthetics.

If one of the quality suppliers has one for a Ruger American I would go that route.

Here ya go!

https://www.stockysstocks.com/stock...-medalist-ruger-americantm-sporter-stock.html

The B&C Medalist stocks with an aluminum insert molded into the stock are the least expensive quality option. The aluminum chassis provides strength, but it also adds bulk and weight. But the weight on these is not excessive, especially with an already lightweight rifle like the Ruger American.

If I were going to replace the stock on any of my Rugers this is the way I'd go. But I'm having a hard time justifying spending $300 on a stock for a rifle that cost me under $350 that already shoots 1/2 MOA as it is.

If I wanted a quality stock i'd just buy one of the cheap rifles and replace the stock. The B&C Medalist is the cheapest I'd recommend.

The difference between the high end McMillan, Brown Precision, and a few others is significant. As is price. You'll pay $500-$600+ for one, but instead of a metal insert they laminate layers of either fiberglass or kevlar cloth ti form the core of the stock. The action cutout is done exactly the same as it is done with wood rather than just coming out of a mold. You get a stock that is just as rigid, but significantly trimmer and lighter.

You can get one of these stocks as light as 14-15 oz with 22-24 oz being typical. Compared to factory stocks in the 32-36 oz range. The ones with aluminum inserts are 32-40 oz. depending.
 
I have a synthetic on my Browning X-Bolt. It’s extremely solid. Price wise, it’s probably a little higher than you’re looking for. Accuracy is exceptional. CRF.

I happened to get a screaming deal on mine, so it fit in your price range.

I have a hard time justifying buying a $400 rifle with a cheap stock, then replacing it with a $350 one and by the time you’re done screwing around, you’ve still got $800 in a $400 rifle. But, if it somehow fits you better, or your needs better, it’s your money. Go for it.

I have a friend that prides himself on buying cheap cars and fixing them up. By the time he’s done, he has as much in them as a much better car. He fools himself because he fixates on the initial price, not the effective cost. And he still ends up with rolling pile of junk.
 
Last edited:
Bell & Carlson and HS Precision make aluminum bedding block stocks that don't suck. Any rifle that uses one of those, like the M70 Extreme Weather, will not feel cheap. Same for the Manners stocks although they use a conventional pillar design.

The savage Accustock manages to feel cheap while actually being perfectly fine from an accuracy perspective. It's a lot like their actions in that respect. The Ruger American stock is similar but maybe feels better.
 
The best I have personally handled is the Howa but that has been sometime ago. I also picked up a Remington 700 something or the other in plastic just kickin' tires at the LGS not too many weeks ago and it wasn't bad.
 
The problem with the Vanguard is they all come in 24” barrel and that’s too long for the woods hunting that I do.

The Ruger American and Savage Axis fall into the cheap feeling category. My two synthetic rimfire are Ruger Americans.

I will check out some of the other options that have been suggested.
 
I really like the look and feel of the Begara rifles. I'm looking seriously at their rimfires, but the above recommendations for the Bergara Hunter are probably right on target. I have a Remington 700 VSF, which means "varmint synthetic fluted". It would not suit your needs because it is a varmint rifle. But, if you can find one in a .243, you would have a fine deer rifle. It is a good looking stock; gray with black webbing and wears like iron. I've put mine through tons of use and it still looks good.
 
I much prefer the Tikka over the Vanguard S2 for hunting. The Weatherby's are great for me on the bench, but feel much more cumbersome than the Tikka's and T/C Ventures for hunting.

My current deer gun is a Venture in 6.5CM. It wasn't particularly expensive and shoots above its price point.
 
I'm looking for suggestions here. My only synthetic rifles are rimfire currently. I'd like to have a synthetic rifle for deer hunting, in a short action caliber, that isn't 1)very expensive or 2)very cheap. Is there a decent middle ground rifle, somewhere in the $500-$600 range? It just seems like all of the synthetic stock rifles I see these day are all very flimsy and cheap feeling.
My favorite is a Ruger M77 Hawkeye synthetic in 270 Win. I know you said short action. Mine with its 22" barrel and slim stock, I really don't care it balances perfect. Nothing cheap feeling about the Ruger. It is discontinued. But they can be found used You can find them in 308, 243. IMG_20180330_161941089.jpg
 
Last edited:

The 20" barrel is a youth/compact model. Shorter length of pull and I'm 6'1" with long arms. I can't really do a compact rifle very well. Also, I've not seen anywhere that stock the 22" model you linked. Every place I've ever seen all has 24" barrels.
 
My favorite is a Ruger M77 Hawkeye synthetic in 270 Win. I know you said short action. Mine with its 22" barrel and slim stock, I really don't care it balances perfect. Nothing cheap feeling about the Ruger. It is discontinued. But they can be found used You can find them in 308, 243.View attachment 901518
I really wanted to get one of the older Ruger M77 with the Zytel boat paddle stocks, but after looking at the prices on GB I quickly decided against that.
 
Not Mossberg Patriot. Great rifle. The synthetic stock however makes Tupperware seem refined.

None of the lower priced rifles are going to feel nice despite their accuracy. That means Savage Axis, T/C Compass, many of the Ruger Americans, and the aforementioned Patriot. All good value for money but the stocks generally feel cheesy.

Remember that laminate, while heavier than composite/plastic, is excellent at keeping the weather out, so that 's another option.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top