The opposition in Canada

Status
Not open for further replies.

LAR-15

Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2004
Messages
3,385
OTTAWA -- Wendy Cukier has spent the last 15 years crusading for gun control - a campaign that has won her accolades and, at times, abuse.

But Cukier, the president of the Toronto-based Coalition for Gun Control, says the long hours she's put in lobbying the government to bring in tougher gun laws have been therapeutic.

Cukier, a professor at Toronto's Ryerson University, said it was the tragedy of the 1989 Montreal massacre, in which 14 young women were gunned down by a lone gunman, that prompted her to take up the cause.

"I was working at a university in Toronto and (the massacre) was pretty close to home and I'd always assumed, like most Canadians, that we had strong gun laws," Cukier told Sun Media.

"When I found out there were six million rifles and shotguns and no one knew who owned them, it was fairly clear that we didn't have laws as strong as I'd thought."


When the federal government brought in the Firearms Act in 1995, Cukier called it a "highlight" in the gun-control lobby effort.

But it hasn't been easy.

"I don't think most people would have expected that 10 years after the law passed, with a fairly substantial majority of Canadians supporting it, that we'd still be fighting the same arguments over and over again," she said.

That's due in large part, Cukier says, to the opposition's determination "to keep the focus on the gun registry, which is only one aspect of the federal gun-control program.

"If you're not prepared to fund the licensing of gun owners, and you don't support the registration of firearms, what exactly is it that you support?" Cukier asked, referring to the Tories' demand to dump the registry.

"My principal frustration has been that I think the opposition has been very effective in turning what I consider to be a reasonable success story into a story about overspending and mismanagement."

Cukier points to recent statistics that show the number of Canadians being killed annually by guns is declining.

"In 1989, almost 1,400 Canadians were killed with guns. In 2003, it was down to 816. That's not all gun control, but gun control is a big part of it," Cukier said.

"It's at least 500 fewer Canadians killed with guns, and the population has increased. If 500 fewer Canadians were killed by drunk drivers, people would be dancing on the tables and calling this a huge achievement."
 
"It's at least 500 fewer Canadians killed with guns,
The BIG question is; how much did the TOTAL kill rate go up or down, or did it stay about the same. There is more than one way to kill a person.

These crusaders seem to only look at the numbers that prove their point, not the total of all incidents.
 
"My principal frustration has been that I think the opposition has been very effective in turning what I consider to be a reasonable success story into a story about overspending and mismanagement."
Of course to the left, overspending and mismanagement ARE signs of "success' :p
 
"It's at least 500 fewer Canadians killed with guns, and the population has increased. If 500 fewer Canadians were killed by drunk drivers, people would be dancing on the tables and calling this a huge achievement."


Soooo.... Ms. Kook-eee-aay, would that reduction in drunk driving be attibuted to banning certain makes and models of cars and requiring that everyone have drivers licenses...or would the focus be on people who drink and drive?
 
...Cukier, the president of the Toronto-based Coalition for Gun Control, says the long hours she's put in lobbying the government to bring in tougher gun laws have been therapeutic.

Leftist extremists believe their personal feelings trump other people's rights. They're moral and intellectual parasites.
 
You can send her a note.

Wendy Cukier
Technology in Practice

University Ryerson University
E-Mail Address [email protected]
Phone Number (416) 979-5000 ext. 6740
Office Location B835 Business Building
Office Hours 4-6 Tuesday or by appointment


Education
B.A. (Brock); M.A.; M.B.A. (Toronto); Ph. D (York); DU (HC) Laval; LLD (HC), Concordia; M.S.C.

Found at http://www.yorku.ca/comcult/frames/staff/profiles/cukier.html

Also included on that site is much information about her.
 
Biggest problems are magazine capacity limits, and outright ban of anything bull-pup. These things were implemented in the act, and the act lists firearms by name, listing dozens of AKs and clones, FNCs, FALs, etc. Luckily NEW firearms would have to be added by name as well, and as long as we're fighting them on what they did previously, they can't plan to pursue their goals further.

I think the article is a bad thing, because it supports my pre-coneived prejudice. I always imagine these 'banning' types to be lonely women who get their jollies, their sense of importance and self-worth, from their 'banning' movements. This article supports that:( And once they acheive some semblance of power, they are easily corrupted by it, and their original notion that 'banning guns is good for safety', well that converts into 'banning guns is good for me, as it maintains my position and power'.
 
"In 1989, almost 1,400 Canadians were killed with guns. In 2003, it was down to 816. That's not all gun control, but gun control is a big part of it," Cukier said.

So was gun control a big part in 1976 when Canada enacted new restrictive gun laws and the gun homicide rate went up?
 
She has gained herself a lovely job with good pay. The Cdn Govt will send her to so many UN meetings when it comes to f/arms & to any part of the world where f/arms are being discussed. This gal has hit it big time & she knows how to suck up as much as she wants. We know her best as "Kookie".

She was part of the reason Cdns f/arms owners have been looking at Bill C-68 that was passed some yrs ago. It has now almost hit 2 billion dollars in cost & will never stop. Even the Attorney General has brought the terrible waste of money due to Bill C-68 & the so called f/arms control that has made no difference when it comes to illegal use of f/arms in Cdn.

Look at all the gang shootings going on in Toronto Ontario & how the police have simply lost control to even the Mayor crying out for all guns, in Toronto to be stored in special City storage places only that is as crazy as you can imagine & now said idea has been dropped. Note all those h/guns being used in gang fights are not registered h/guns & the shooters or those that use them do NOT have a PAL.

Every person with a f/arm must have a Possession & Acquisition License (PAL) to purchase any form of f/arm, ammo, powder, primers & such. True there is a Possession Only License (POL) which is saying the present f/arm owner never intends to buy another f/arm.

Also ALL f/arms be the long bbl guns along with h/guns had to be registered & in the case of h/guns it was re-registered since h/guns have been registered since '34.

Any of you remember the shooting of four RCMP Constables last year up east of Edmonton Alberta? Well that owner of a semi-auto 7.62mm rifle would never have been allowed to have any form of a f/arm, but he had one & killed the four RCMP Constables.
 
Last edited:
Wendy

This article was in the Toronto Sun surrounded by pro gun, anti c-68 articles.

Cukier is an example of someone who is "tramatiized" by an event that they have no conection with.I have sympathy for the victims of any tragedy but tragedy happens every day.Why is one event more tragic than another?
 
Cukier, a professor at Toronto's Ryerson University, said it was the tragedy of the 1989 Montreal massacre, in which 14 young women were gunned down by a lone gunman, that prompted her to take up the cause.

I wonder how many would have been killed if say, just one of the victims had herself been armed ??? Would Ms Cukier be advocating Concealed Carry in Canada had that been the case ???


Things that make you go hmmmm.....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top