Trijicon MRO vs Aimpoint Pro

[dwstone1227]

I am looking to replace my returned Eotech on my AR-15 (LWRC M6A2). My first inclination was to go with the Aimpoint Pro. However, I got to handle a Trijicon MRO and I have to say I am very impressed by the MRO. Not only is it smaller, but it weighs almost half as much.

Comparing
MRO vs Aimpoint
Battery CR2032 vs Type 2L76
Bat Life 5 yr vs 30,000 hrs
Weight 4.1 oz. vs 7.8 oz
Length 2.6" vs 4.5"
Width 1.7" vs 2 3/16"
Warranty 5 yr vs 10 yr
Controls Good vs Not so good
Cost ~$100 more for MRO


I realize the Aimpoint has a long history of being very dependable and near indestructible. At the same time, Trijicon products also have a very good history. I am strongly leaning towards the Trijicon MRO. The $100 price difference is a factor, but this thing is going to last me for a long time. The controls on the MRO are well thought out.

Does anybody have any first hand information on the MRO?

Which mounts are preferred for allowing co-witnessing?

Thanks
Dws

 

[md7]

I purchased the pro about a month or so ago. I like it, and would feel good about recommending it assuming it performs well over the long haul.

The MRO caught my attention too, and I may give it a go for another rifle if don't go with a lpvo.

Based on my limited knowledge, id feel ok about the MRO especially if youve had an opportunity to see one in person and know that you like it.

 

[rWt]

The Aimpoint Micro T seems more of a comparison to the MRO (size and weight). But the price difference is greater.

 

[dwstone1227]

That Aimpoint Micro T sure is a nice optic, but I can buy a lot of ammo for the $250 price increase. Most of the MRO reviews are positive. I was hoping if anyone had one they would chime in hear. Not much luck on that. Oh well. Thanks for replying.